Tribeca Lending Corp. v Bartlett
2017 NY Slip Op 08735 [156 AD3d 519]
December 14, 2017
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, January 24, 2018
As corrected through Wednesday, February 7, 2018


[*1]
 Tribeca Lending Corporation, Respondent,
v
Gregory M. Bartlett, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Gregory M. Bartlett, appellant pro se.

Berkman, Henoch, Peterson, Peddy & Fenchel, P.C., Garden City (Daniel J. Evers of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered November 1, 2016, which denied defendant Gregory Bartlett's motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant may not relitigate issues resolved in prior appeals in this case (see 121 AD3d 613 [1st Dept 2014]; 103 AD3d 516 [1st Dept 2013]; 84 AD3d 496 [1st Dept 2011]). Nor may he raise new arguments in this appeal, because he had a full and fair opportunity to raise them in the prior appeals, and he has made no showing of subsequent evidence or a change of law (see Delgado v City of New York, 144 AD3d 46, 51 [1st Dept 2016]; see also East N.Y. Sav. Bank v Sun Beam Enters., 248 AD2d 245, 246 [1st Dept 1998]).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Gische, J.P., Webber, Oing, Singh and Moulton, JJ.