| Thomas v Slaton |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 00392 [157 AD3d 594] |
| January 23, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Donald Thomas et al., Appellants, v Denise Slaton et al., Respondents. |
Busson & Sikorski, P.C., New York (Robert S. Sikorski of counsel), for appellants.
Schwartzman Garelik Walker & Troy, P.C., New York (Donald A. Pitofsky of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo S. Hagler, J.), entered August 22, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from, in this action for adverse possession, denied plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Triable issues of fact exist as to whether plaintiffs' possession of the subject property was hostile and exclusive for the statutory period of 10 years (see generally Brand v Prince, 35 NY2d 634, 636 [1974]). Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber, Oing, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2017 NY Slip Op 31766(U).]