Cortijo v New York City Hous. Auth.
2018 NY Slip Op 03894 [161 AD3d 689]
May 31, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, June 27, 2018


[*1]
 Eugenia Cortijo, Respondent,
v
New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., New York (Linda M. Brown of counsel), for appellant.

Pena & Kahn, PLLC, Bronx (Diane Welch Bando of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Llinet M. Rosado, J.), entered on or about August 14, 2017, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Concur—Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.