| People v Garcia |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 05961 [164 AD3d 454] |
| August 30, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| The People of the State of New York,
Respondent, v Carlos Garcia, Appellant. |
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Brittany N. Francis of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jared Wolkowitz of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered July 15,
2014, as amended September 27, 2016, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal
possession of stolen property in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate
term of 2
We reject defendant's challenges to the legal sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting his conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The testimony and exhibits regarding the value of the car, taken as a whole, were sufficient to meet the statutory threshold (see People v Singh, 35 AD3d 317 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 927 [2007]; People v Kirnon, 39 AD2d 666, 667 [1972], affd 31 NY2d 877 [1972]; see also People v Jones, 73 NY2d 427, 430 [1989]).
Moreover, we find no basis for disturbing any of the jury's credibility determinations. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Gische, Mazzarelli, Gesmer, JJ.