| People v Walker (Winston) |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 50014(U) [58 Misc 3d 145(A)] |
| Decided on January 8, 2018 |
| Appellate Term, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (John Cataldo, J.H.O), rendered January 14, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of violating Arts and Cultural Affairs Law § 25.11, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (John Cataldo, J.H.O), rendered January 14, 2015, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, fine and surcharge, if paid, remitted.
As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015]).
In view of the foregoing, we reach no other issue.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.