| BH 2105 Atl., LLC v Rodriguez |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 50423(U) [59 Misc 3d 130(A)] |
| Decided on March 23, 2018 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Glizer Rodriguez, appellant pro se. Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. (Jeffrey R. Metz, Massimo D'Angelo of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Marina C. Mundy, J.), entered November 13, 2015, deemed from a final judgment of that court entered December 1, 2015 (see CPLR 5512 [a]). The final judgment, entered pursuant to the November 13, 2015 order denying occupant's motion to dismiss the petition and granting petitioner's cross motion for summary judgment, awarded possession to petitioner in an RPAPL 713 summary proceeding.
ORDERED that the final judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner commenced this RPAPL 713 summary proceeding to recover possession of property it had purchased at a tax foreclosure sale in July 2011, and for which it had received title in January 2012. Occupant moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the foreclosure sale of the property had been improper and that petitioner had never obtained title to the property. Petitioner opposed the motion and cross-moved for summary judgment. In an order dated November 13, 2015, the Civil Court denied occupant's motion and granted petitioner's cross motion for summary judgment. The Civil Court found that it was bound by an amended order of the Supreme Court (Ingrid Joseph, J.), dated September 30, 2014, which held that petitioner had title to the property. Occupant's appeal from the November 13, 2015 order is deemed to be from the final judgment, entered December 1, 2015 pursuant to the order, awarding possession to petitioner (see CPLR 5512 [a]).
For the reasons stated in BH 2105 Atl., LLC v Rodriguez ( Misc 3d , 2018 NY Slip Op [appeal No. 2016-867 K C], decided herewith), the final judgment is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.