[*1]
People v Constant (Roche)
2018 NY Slip Op 50545(U) [59 Misc 3d 137(A)]
Decided on April 13, 2018
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on April 13, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Ling-Cohan, J.P., Cooper, Edmead, JJ.
16-369

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Roche Constant, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Richard M. Weinberg, J.), rendered May 12, 2015, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Richard M. Weinberg, J.), rendered May 12, 2015, affirmed.

Application of appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur


Decision Date: April 13, 2018