| People v Bruno (Akmel) |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 51335(U) [61 Misc 3d 127(A)] |
| Decided on September 21, 2018 |
| Appellate Term, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Steven M. Statsinger, J.), rendered July 16, 2014, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of menacing in the second degree, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Steven M. Statsinger, J.), rendered July 16, 2014, affirmed.
The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. Allegations that defendant "advance[d] toward [complainant] while swinging a knife at him" were sufficient to charge defendant with menacing in the second degree (see Penal Law § 120.14[1]). The manner in which the knife was used qualified it as a dangerous instrument, even though the knife was not described with particularity (see People v Carter, 53 NY2d 113 [1981]; Matter of Jonathan M., 4 AD3d 154 [2004]). The factual allegations also supported an inference that defendant intended to place complainant in reasonable fear of physical injury (see People v Bracey, 41 NY2d 296 [1977]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.