| Continental Med., P.C. v MVAIC |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 51549(U) [61 Misc 3d 136(A)] |
| Decided on November 2, 2018 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Tracy Bader Pollack of counsel), for appellant. Israel, Israel & Purdy, LLP (Jennifer Greenhalgh Howard of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), dated October 29, 2014, deemed from a judgment of that court entered March 13, 2015 (see CPLR 5512 [a]). The judgment, entered pursuant to the decision, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $15,646.35.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.
After a nonjury trial in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the Civil Court awarded judgment to plaintiff in the principal sum of $15,646.35.
The evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish that plaintiff had exhausted its remedies against the vehicle's owner (see Matter of Acosta-Collado v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 103 AD3d 714 [2013]; Hauswirth v American Home Assur. Co., 244 AD2d 528 [1997]). As a result, plaintiff's claim is premature (see Matter of Acosta-Collado, 103 AD3d 714; Hauswirth, 244 AD2d 528; Dr. Abakin, D.C., P.C. v MVAIC, 21 Misc 3d 134[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 5218[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; see also Matter of Sweet v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 287 AD2d 510 [2001]; Matter of Troches v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 171 AD2d 873 [1991]).
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.