| Matter of Cunningham v Annucci |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 00661 [168 AD3d 1340] |
| January 31, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Michael E. Cunningham,
Petitioner, v Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent. |
Michael E. Cunningham, Romulus, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations of the Superintendent of Five Points Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge two tier II prison disciplinary determinations finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determinations have been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharges have been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has been granted all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Boeck v Annucci, 165 AD3d 1334, 1334 [2018]; Matter of Little v Lee, 164 AD3d 1559, 1560 [2018]).
Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.