| People v Adorno |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 02754 [171 AD3d 1310] |
| April 11, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| The People of the State of New York,
Respondent, v Fernando Adorno, Appellant. |
Justin C. Brusgul, Voorheesville, for appellant.
D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered January 18, 2017, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree and waived the right to appeal.
County Court thereafter imposed the agreed-upon sentence of 4
We affirm. Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that his sentence is harsh and excessive. This argument is precluded by defendant's unchallenged waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Valachovic, 163 AD3d 1351, 1351-1352 [2018]; People v Chapman, 160 AD3d 1211, 1211 [2018]). Therefore, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.