People v Gooden
2019 NY Slip Op 07145 [176 AD3d 434]
October 3, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, December 4, 2019


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
David Gooden, Appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Samuel Z. Goldfine of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), entered on or about May 3, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). We do not find any overassessment of points or mitigating factors that were inadequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. The evidence before the hearing court, which assessed 150 points, demonstrated defendant's high risk of reoffense and did not warrant a departure. Concur—Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Singh, JJ.