Matter of Adama D. v Mariam D.
2019 NY Slip Op 07724 [176 AD3d 607]
October 29, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, December 4, 2019


[*1]
 In the Matter of Adama D., Appellant,
v
Mariam D., Respondent.

Anne Reiniger, New York, for appellant.

Jo Ann Douglas Family Law, PLLC, New York (Jo Ann Douglas of counsel), for respondent.

Andrew J. Baer, New York, attorney for the children.

Order, Family Court, New York County (J. Machelle Sweeting, J.), entered on or about May 15, 2018, which dismissed petitioner father's petition to modify a prior order of custody with prejudice, and directed that petitioner must obtain leave of the court before filing any future petitions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The father failed to make the required evidentiary showing of changed circumstances warranting a modification of custody or a hearing (see Matter of Patricia C. v Bruce L., 46 AD3d 399 [1st Dept 2007]). Furthermore, the record shows that the court providently exercised its discretion in directing the father to obtain leave of court before filing any future petitions (see Matter of Molinari v Tuthill, 59 AD3d 722, 723 [2d Dept 2009]). Concur—Richter, J.P., Gische, Tom, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.