| On the Way to Brooklyn, LLC v Korn |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 08358 [177 AD3d 495] |
| November 19, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| On the Way to Brooklyn, LLC, et al.,
Appellants, v Charles Korn et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. Louis Atlas et al., Proposed Intervenors-Plaintiffs. On the Way to Brooklyn, LLC, Appellant, v The Home of the Sages of Israel, Inc., Defendant. In the Matter of The Home of the Sages of Israel, Inc., Appellant. On the Way to Brooklyn, LLC, et al., Intervenors-Appellants, and Louis Atlas et al., Intervenors-Respondents. |
Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, New York (Andrew G. Celli, Jr. of counsel), for On the Way to Brooklyn, LLC and another, appellants.
Harris Beach PLLC, Albany (Victoria A. Graffeo of counsel), for Home of the Sages of Israel, Inc., appellant.
Jaroslawicz & Jaros PLLC, New York (David Jaroslawicz of counsel), for Charles Korn and others, respondents.
Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, Lake Success (Matthew Didora of counsel), for 2016 Board of Trustees of Home of The Sages of Israel, Inc., respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered October 17, 2017 which, inter alia, dismissed with prejudice the petition for approval of the sale of property to intervenor On the Way to Brooklyn, LLC, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered October 18, 2017, which granted defendant The Home of the Sages of Israel, Inc.'s motion to dismiss On the Way to Brooklyn, LLC's complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered October 18, 2017, which, inter alia, dismissed On the Way to Brooklyn, LLC and Peter Fine's complaint as moot, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In a well-reasoned decision, the court properly denied approval of the sale of petitioner's property to intervenors On the Way to Brooklyn, LLC and Peter Fine. The court properly rejected appellants' contentions that petitioner had amended its bylaws and ceased operating a house of worship prior to the proposed sale and that petitioner's board of directors, elected by individuals from petitioner's community of interest in 2012, had sole authority to act on petitioner's behalf and to approve the sale.
We have considered appellants' remaining contentions and find that they are unavailing. Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.