Matter of Forsyth v City of Rochester
2020 NY Slip Op 04249 [185 AD3d 1499]
July 24, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, September 2, 2020


[*1]
 In the Matter of Theodore Forsyth, Appellant,
v
City of Rochester et al., Respondents. (Appeal No. 2.)

Roth & Roth LLP, New York City (Elliot Shields of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.

Timothy R. Curtin, Corporation Counsel, Rochester (Stephanie A. Prince of counsel), for respondents-respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered June 3, 2019, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order denied the motion of petitioner seeking, among other things, to hold respondents in contempt.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Forsyth v City of Rochester ([appeal No. 1] 185 AD3d 1499 [4th Dept 2020]). Present—Smith, J.P., Lindley, NeMoyer, Troutman and DeJoseph, JJ.