| Matter of Kayla C. (Stephanie C.) |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 05447 [187 AD3d 434] |
| October 6, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Kayla C., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Stephanie C., Appellant; Administration for Children's Services, Respondent. |
The Law Offices of Salihah R. Denman, PLLC, New York (Salihah R. Denman of counsel), for appellant.
James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York (Deborah E. Wassel of counsel), for respondent.
Richard L. Herzfeld, P.C., New York (Richard L. Herzfeld of counsel), attorney for the child.
Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma M. Gomez, J.), entered on or about February 6, 2019, which, after a hearing, denied respondent mother's application pursuant to Family Court Act § 1028 for the return of the child, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.
The appeal was rendered moot by the return of the child to respondent's care pursuant to an order entered on consent during the pendency of the appeal (see Matter of Javier R. [Robert R.], 43 AD3d 1 [1st Dept 2007], appeal dismissed 10 NY3d 754 [2008]). Contrary to respondent's contention, this matter does not warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Webber, Kern, Moulton, JJ.