Rosenfeld & Kaplan, LLP, New York (Steven M. Kaplan of counsel), for appellant.

Hoguet Newman Regal & Kenney, LLP, New York (Damian R. Cavaleri of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered on or about February 26, 2019, which denied in part plaintiff's motion to compel defendant to produce certain discovery documents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

"Discovery determinations rest with the sound discretion of the motion court" (Gumbs v Flushing Town Ctr. III, L.P., 114 AD3d 573, 574 [1st Dept 2014]). Although this Court is vested with "corresponding power to substitute its own discretion for that of the trial court, even in the absence of abuse" (Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v Occidental Gems, Inc., 11 NY3d 843, 845 [2008]), we decline to disturb the motion court's determination. Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the subject discovery requests would yield information that was material and necessary to its defense against the counterclaims asserted against it. Concur—Renwick, J.P., González, Kennedy, Mendez, JJ.