Leslie S. Lowenstein, Woodmere, for appellant.

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about December 14, 2018, which, after a hearing, awarded the mother unsupervised visitation with the subject child subject to certain restrictions, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Application by the father's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). A review of the record demonstrates that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. The father is not aggrieved by the order since he consented to visitation subject to the restrictions he requested, which the court granted (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Geddes v Montpetit, 15 AD3d 797 [3d Dept 2005], lv dismissed 4 NY3d 869 [2005]). In any event, the order has now been superseded by a subsequent order, thus rendering the appeal moot (see e.g. Matter of Rolando A.G. v Marisol R.M., 172 AD3d 631, 631 [1st Dept 2019]). Concur—Renwick, J.P., Gesmer, Kern, Singh, JJ.