Matter of Smith v Commissioner of N.Y. State Bd. of Parole
2020 NY Slip Op 07444 [189 AD3d 1804]
December 10, 2020
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, February 3, 2021


[*1]
 In the Matter of James Smith, Appellant,
v
Commissioner of New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

James Smith, Collins, appellant pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Beezly Kiernan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Collins, J.), entered December 16, 2019, in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a September 2018 determination of the Board of Parole denying his third request for parole release. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued. The Attorney General has advised this Court that, during the pendency of this appeal, petitioner reappeared before the Board and was denied parole. In view of this, the appeal is now moot and, contrary to petitioner's contention, we find that the exception to the mootness doctrine is inapplicable (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). As such, the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Cruz v Division of Parole, N.Y. State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 185 AD3d 1369, 1369 [2020]; Matter of Burr v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, Bd. of Parole, 185 AD3d 1361, 1361 [2020], lv dismissed and denied 36 NY3d 925 [2020]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.