| People v David A. |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 02254 [193 AD3d 515] |
| April 13, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| The People of the State of New York,
Respondent, v David A., Appellant. |
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Emilia King-Musza of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Christopher Michael Pederson of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), rendered April 29, 2019,
convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second
degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2
The court made a proper youthful offender determination, on the merits, in full compliance with People v Rudolph (21 NY3d 497 [2013]). The record does not support defendant's argument to the contrary.
Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545 [2019], cert denied 589 US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096 [2016]), which forecloses review of his excessive sentence claim and his challenge to the denial of youthful offender treatment. Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment, given the seriousness of the underlying crime, in which defendant shot a rival gang member. We also perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
As the People concede, because defendant is a juvenile offender, the surcharge and fee did not apply. Concur—Kapnick, J.P., Kern, Singh, Scarpulla, JJ.