| Matter of Cindy M. v Marisol M. |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 00506 [201 AD3d 592] |
| January 27, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Cindy M., Appellant, v Marisol M., Respondent. |
Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered on or about March 2, 2021, which denied petitioner's family offense petition seeking an order of protection, on behalf of her child, Destiney M., against respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Application by petitioner's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). A review of the record shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. The evidence fails to show that respondent's actions or inactions could support a finding that she committed reckless endangerment or disorderly conduct (see Family Ct Act § 812; Penal Law §§ 120.20, 240.20). Concur—Kern, J.P., Kennedy, Scarpulla, Mendez, Shulman, JJ.