| Beck v City of Niagara Falls |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 03931 [38 NY3d 1117] |
| June 16, 2022 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, August 31, 2022 |
| Daniel J. Beck et al., Appellants, v City of Niagara Falls et al., Defendants, and Patriot Field Services, Inc., Respondent. |
Decided June 16, 2022
Beck v City of Niagara Falls, 201 AD3d 1313, affirmed.
Francis M. Letro, Buffalo (Carey C. Beyer of counsel), for appellants.
Smith Sovik Kendrick & Sugnet P.C., Syracuse (David M. Katz of counsel), for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. In response to the prima facie showing by defendant Patriot Field Services, Inc. that it was entitled to summary judgment, plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of material fact.
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Wilson, Singas, Cannataro and Troutman concur.