| Perri v Case |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 04873 [208 AD3d 1049] |
| August 4, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Michael Perri, Respondent, v Mark Case, Doing Business as Case's Mini Storage, et al., Appellants. (Appeal No. 2.) |
Refermat Hurwitz & Daniel PLLC, Rochester (John T. Refermat of counsel), for defendant-appellant Mark Case, Doing Business as Case's Mini Storage.
Nixon Peabody LLP, Rochester (Zachary C. Osinski of counsel), for defendants-appellants Brian Cook and another.
Santiago Burger LLP, Rochester (Fernando Santiago of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered October 7, 2021. The order denied the motion of defendant Mark Case, doing business as Case's Mini Storage for leave to reargue and renew the opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ordered that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Perri v Case ([appeal No. 1] 208 AD3d 1046 [4th Dept 2022]). Present—Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra, Lindley and Bannister, JJ.