| People v Montezuma (Justin) |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 51109(U) [77 Misc 3d 127(A)] |
| Decided on October 20, 2022 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected in part through January 17, 2023; it will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Suffolk County Traffic Prosecutor's Office (Justin W. Smiloff of counsel), for appellant. Justin Montezuma, respondent pro se (no brief filed).
Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency (Debra Urbano-DiSalvo, J.H.O.), dated September 17, 2021. The order granted defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment entered pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1806-a upon a charge of operating a motor vehicle without insurance, and, upon such vacatur, to dismiss the simplified traffic information charging that offense.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to the District Court of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, for a new determination, following a hearing, of defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment entered pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1806-a upon a charge of operating a motor vehicle without insurance, and, upon such vacatur, to dismiss the simplified traffic information charging that offense.
For the reasons stated in People v Montezuma (— Misc 3d —, 2022 NY Slip Op — [Appeal No. 2021-647 S C], decided herewith), the order is reversed and the matter is remitted to the District Court of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, for a new determination, following a hearing, of defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment entered pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1806-a upon a charge of operating a motor vehicle without insurance, and, upon such vacatur, to dismiss the simplified traffic [*2]information charging that offense.
GARGUILO, P.J., EMERSON and DRISCOLL, JJ., concur.