| People v Baker |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 06062 [221 AD3d 916] |
| November 22, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| The People of the State of New York,
Respondent, v Randy Baker, Appellant. |
Appeal by the defendant from an order of Supreme Court, Kings County (Guy J. Mangano, Jr., J.), dated May 16, 2018, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In this proceeding pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), the defendant appeals from an order, made after a hearing, designating him a level three sex offender.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Oliver, 215 AD3d 772 [2023]).
The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in relying on the risk assessment instrument is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, without merit.
The defendant's remaining contention does not entitle him to relief under the circumstances (cf. People v Torres, 210 AD3d 1027, 1028 [2022]). Dillon, J.P., Iannacci, Maltese and Wan, JJ., concur.