Pisano v Pisano
2025 NY Slip Op 02664 [238 AD3d 426]
May 1, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 9, 2025


[*1]
 Kathleen Pisano, by Joyce Henion, as Attorney-in-Fact, Respondent,
v
Philip Pisano, Appellant, et al., Intervenor.

Vernon & Ginsburg, LLP, New York (Mel B. Ginsburg of counsel), for appellant.

Fox Rothschild LLP, New York (Matthew J. Schenker of counsel), for respondent.


HEADNOTES


Dismissal and Nonsuit - Dismissal of Counterclaim - Appeal Abandoned

Order Supreme Court, New York County (Dakota D. Ramseur, J.), entered on or about October 18, 2023, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted so much of plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment as sought to dismiss the counterclaims, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on the second counterclaim by demonstrating that defendant based his claim to ownership of the corporate shares solely on an unauthenticated, undated stock certificate, and that he had no knowledge of the certificate's provenance or purpose. Moreover, as plaintiff established on her motion, the certificate was rife with irregularities; for example, it bore an "and/or" designation for ownership. Of the two people who might have authenticated the certificate, one denied any recollection of it, and the other deemed it a fraud. In opposition to plaintiff's motion, defendant failed to raise an issue of fact.

Defendant has abandoned his appeal regarding dismissal of the first counterclaim by failing to make any argument as to that counterclaim in his opening brief on appeal (see Llanos v City of New York, 129 AD3d 620, 620 [1st Dept 2015]).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Moulton, J.P., Friedman, Kapnick, Shulman, O'Neill Levy, JJ. [Prior Case History: 80 Misc 3d 1230(A), 2023 NY Slip Op 51136(U).]