Matter of Diamonds R-Us Ltd. v Rafaello & Co. Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 03245 [238 AD3d 664]
May 29, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 9, 2025


[*1]
 In the Matter of Diamonds R-Us Ltd., Respondent,
v
Rafaello & Company Inc. et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.

Pierce & Kwok LLP, New York (Aaron H. Pierce of counsel), for appellants.

Altschul & Altschul, New York (Mark M. Altschul of counsel), for respondent.


HEADNOTES


Judgments - Default Judgment - Order Granting Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award Entered on Default after Appellants' Failure to Submit Opposition - Motion to Vacate Default Proper Remedy

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eric Schumacher, J.), entered on or about July 25, 2024, which, to the extent appealed from, granted petitioner's petition to confirm the arbitration award rendered in petitioner's favor as against respondents-appellants Rafaello & Company Inc. and Rafael Khay also known as Rafaelkhay Aranbayev, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

No appeal lies from the July 25, 2024 order, as it was entered on default after appellants failed to submit opposition to petitioner's motion to confirm the arbitration award (see CPLR 5511; see e.g. Figiel v Met Food, 48 AD3d 330, 330 [1st Dept 2008]). Appellants' proper remedy is to move to vacate their default before the Justice who entered the default in Supreme Court, and, if that motion is denied, to appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate (see Figiel, 48 AD3d at 330).

We have considered appellants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Moulton, J.P., Friedman, Scarpulla, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ.