Crimes - Sentence - Class C Violent Felony - Sentence at Lower End of Permissible Range Not Harsh or Excessive

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Richard Rich Jr., J.), rendered December 12, 2022, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

In full satisfaction of two pending indictments, defendant agreed to plead guilty to the reduced charge of burglary in the second degree with the understanding that he would be sentenced to a prison term of no more than five years, to be followed by a period of postrelease supervision to be determined by County Court. The charges stemmed from an incident wherein defendant, in violation of an order of protection, forced his way into the home of his pregnant ex-girlfriend and assaulted her. Defendant pleaded guilty to the foregoing crime, and County Court sentenced defendant to a prison term of five years, to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. This appeal ensued.

Defendant's sole argument upon appeal is that the sentence imposed is unduly harsh or severe. We disagree. Having been convicted of a class C violent felony (see Penal Law §§ 70.02 [1] [c]; 140.25), defendant was subject to a determinate term of imprisonment ranging from 31/2 to 15 years (see Penal Law § 70.02 [3] [b]). In addition to receiving a sentence at the lower end of the permissible statutory range, defendant benefitted from a "highly-advantageous plea agreement, which resolved multiple pending charges and avoided defendant being subjected to consecutive sentences" (People v Terry, 226 AD3d 1215, 1216 [3d Dept 2024]). Accordingly, notwithstanding certain mitigating factors cited by defendant, we do not find—upon due consideration of the record as a whole—that the sentence imposed is unduly harsh or severe (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).

Garry, P.J., Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.