| Velez v City of New York |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 04683 [241 AD3d 754] |
| August 13, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Raul Velez, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants. |
Anna J. Ervolina, Brooklyn, NY (Theresa A. Frame of counsel), for appellants.
Elefterakis, Elefterakis & Panek, New York, NY (Harris J. Zakarin of counsel), for respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leon Ruchelsman, J.), dated April 22, 2024. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon granting the plaintiff's motion to restore the action to active status, set a schedule for the deposition of six defendants' witnesses.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
As acknowledged by the defendants, the portion of the order from which this appeal is taken did not decide a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701 [a]) and, therefore, is not appealable as of right. Leave to appeal has not been granted. Barros, J.P., Christopher, Warhit and McCormack, JJ., concur.