| Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Nolan) |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 05283 [242 AD3d 1268] |
| October 2, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Now Known as Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Michael Kevin Nolan, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 2772846.) |
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for petitioner.
Michael Kevin Nolan, Saddle River, New Jersey, respondent pro se.
Attorney and Client - Reinstatement
Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by January 2014 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 113 AD3d 1020, 1045 [3d Dept 2014]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).
Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to July 23, 2025, the September 5, 2025 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, the supplemental affidavits with exhibit sworn to September 10, 2025, and the September 12, 2025 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined that respondent has not demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, his compliance with the rules of this Court (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16 [c] [5]), it is ordered that respondent's motion for reinstatement is denied. Ordered that respondent's motion for reinstatement is denied.
Clark, J.P., Ceresia, Fisher, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.