Matter of Christopher C.
2025 NY Slip Op 06005 [242 AD3d 1485]
October 30, 2025
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, December 10, 2025


[*1]
 In the Matter of Christopher C., Appellant.

Copps DiPaola Silverman, PLLC, Albany (Joseph R. Williams of counsel), for appellant.


HEADNOTES


Names - Change of Name - Seal of Court Records

Aarons, J. Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (James Walsh, J.), entered December 10, 2024 in Saratoga County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 60, denied petitioner's request to seal court records.

Petitioner, a transgender individual, commenced this Civil Rights Law article 6 proceeding to change her name and to seal the court record of this proceeding. In connection with the sealing request, petitioner affirmed that she was concerned about "retaliation" against her by her employer as well as general violence against transgender individuals. Supreme Court granted the petition to change her name but denied her sealing request because the court's list of "public interest concerns" outweighed the threat to petitioner's safety posed by an open record of the proceeding.[FN*] Petitioner appeals, and, for the reasons stated in Matter of Kieran B. (242 AD3d 1486 [3d Dept 2025] [decided herewith]), we modify the appealed-from order to grant petitioner's sealing request pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 64-a.

Garry, P.J., Fisher, McShan and Mackey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as denied petitioner's request to seal court records; application granted to that extent; and, as so modified, affirmed.

Footnotes


Footnote *:That list "includ[ed], but [was] not limited to, the due process of any judgment creditors, the effects upon powers of attorney, any unknown implications with Article 81 proceedings, the due process in foreclosure actions, deed recordation and title insurance, mortgages recorded with the County Clerk's office, probate matters, interference with single scope background investigations for security clearance purposes or firearm authorizations, and lastly, any adverse impact upon future genealogical research."