Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Bohl) (2025 NY Slip Op 06239)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Bohl)
2025 NY Slip Op 06239 [243 AD3d 1060]
November 13, 2025
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2027


[*1]
 In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Nickolas Arlauckas Bohl, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5155882.)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Nickolas Arlauckas Bohl, Redmond, Washington, respondent pro se.


HEADNOTES


Attorney and Client - Reinstatement

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 208 AD3d 1421, 1425 [3d Dept 2022]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to September 15, 2025, the October 3, 2025 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC), respondent's supplemental affidavit with exhibit sworn to October 6, 2025, and the October 8, 2025 responsive correspondence from AGC, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5), (2) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (3) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (4) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is ordered that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Pritzker, J.P., Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia, Fisher and Powers, JJ., concur.