People v Vilchez-Salazar
2025 NYSlipOp 06739 [244 AD3d 767]
December 3, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, February 4, 2026


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jaklinne Vilchez-Salazar, Appellant.

Christopher Brennan Sevier, Montgomery, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Andrew R. Kass of counsel; Rivka Mandel on the brief), for respondent.


HEADNOTES


Attorney and Client - Withdrawal from Representation - Sufficiency of Brief

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (William L. DeProspo, J.), rendered November 19, 2021, convicting her of criminal sexual act in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Genovesi, J.P., Wan, Taylor and Golia, JJ., concur.