| People ex rel. Boksenbaum v Maginley-Liddie |
| 2025 NYSlipOp 06799 [244 AD3d 799] |
| December 8, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| The People of the State of New York ex rel. Anna Boksenbaum, on Behalf of Carlos Alameda, Petitioner, v Lynelle Maginley-Liddie, Respondent. |
Twyla Carter, Kew Gardens, NY (Anna Boksenbaum pro se of counsel), for petitioner.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Philip Amur, Johnnette Traill, Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott, and Julien Gutierrez of counsel), for respondent.
Habeas Corpus - When Remedy Appropriate - Determination Did Not Violate Constitutional or Statutory Standards
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Carlos Alameda upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Queens County indictment No. 73362/2025.
Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see CPL 510.20; People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Dillon, J.P., Iannacci, Dowling and McCormack, JJ., concur.