People v Sidibe
2026 NY Slip Op 00264 [245 AD3d 833]
January 21, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, March 11, 2026


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Mahamad Sidibe, Appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Robert C. Langdon of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.


HEADNOTES


Crimes - Right to Counsel - Withdrawal from Representation - Sufficiency of Brief

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Abena Darkeh, J.), rendered June 9, 2023, convicting him of criminal trespass in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Brathwaite Nelson, Landicino and Quirk, JJ., concur.