Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20368
L/
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
DAVID S. RITTER
STEPHEN G. CRANE
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2003-09592, 2004-02059 Carmelo & Sons Contracting Corp., respondent, v Marie A. DaSilva, et al., appellants. (Index No. 18093/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Withdraw Appeal on Stipulation |
Application to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 26, 2003, and February 3, 2004, respectively.
Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties, dated January 3, 2005, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
H. MILLER, J.P., SCHMIDT, RITTER, CRANE and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20345
CF/
|
2004-03361 Anthony Damiani, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v Federated Department Stores, Inc., et al., defendants third-third-party plaintiffs-respondents- appellants, Dynamic Resources, Inc., et al., defendants-respondents-appellants, Hutton Electrical Contracting Corp., defendant-respondent; Gilman Construction Company, third-third-party defendant-appellant-respondent (and other third-party actions). (Index No. 13553/97)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the respondent-appellant Federated Department Stores, Inc., to withdraw a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 16, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal by Federated Department Stores, Inc., is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M19322
R/sl
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
BARRY A. COZIER
SONDRA MILLER, JJ.
|
2004-01973 Timothy Farmer, et al., respondents, v City of New York, et al., defendants, Chor Fai Li, et al., appellants. (Appeal No. 1) 2004-04816 Timothy Farmer, et al., respondents-appellants, v City of New York, appellant-respondent, Chor Fai Li, et al., respondents. (Appeal No. 2) 2004-09418 Timothy Farmer, et al., respondents, v City of New York, respondent, Chor Fai Li, et al., appellants, et al., defendants. (Appeal No. 3)
(Index No. 643/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellants Chor Fai Li and Chun Lan Li on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 30, 2004 (A.D. Docket No. 2004-01973), and October 15, 2004 (A.D. Docket No. 2004-09418), respectively, to consolidate the appeals and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals, and application by the appellant-respondent City of New York on an appeal from an order of the same court dated April 29, 2004 (A.D. No. 2004-04816), to enlarge the time to perfect its appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7 [c][1]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated January 30, 2004 (A.D. No. 2004-01973), is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 7, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated October 15, 2004 (A.D. No. 2004-09418), is denied as premature; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, so much of the decision and order on motion of this court dated December 27, 2004, as dismissed the appeal from the order dated April 29, 2004 (A.D. No. 2004-04816), is recalled and vacated, and that appeal is reinstated; and it is further
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant-respondent's time to perfect the appeal from the order dated April 29, 2004, is enlarged until March 7, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant-respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file their answering brief on that appeal, including their points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).
SCHMIDT, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and S. MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20308
PL/sl
|
2004-03308 Leonard Havens, appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, et al., respondents. (Index No. 30186/97)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 17, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondents' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 11, 2005, and the respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20314
PL/sl
|
2004-06351 Bruce Morgan, appellant, v Chong Kwan Jun, et al., respondents. (Index No. 13899/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 16, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 28, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20311
PL/sl
|
2004-06165 Svetlana Pechko, et al., respondents, v Tanya Gendelman, et al., appellants, et al., defendant. (Index No. 33293/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 1, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 6, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20298
S/sl
|
2004-06221
Paul Sano, et al., appellants, v Igor Gorelik, et al., respondents. (Index No. 26631/99)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 24, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 10, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20257
M/nal
|
2004-08773 Jeffrey Weisman, appellant, v Rosemarie Weisman, respondent. (Index No. 17795/01)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Jeffrey Weisman from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 8, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on December 28, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the respondent's brief shall be served and filed within 45 days of the date of this order.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20312
S/sl
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
BARRY A. COZIER
SONDRA MILLER, JJ.
|
2004-03624 In the Matter of Hilary Best, appellant, v Queens County Criminal Court, et al., respondents.
(Index No. 2185/04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 23, 2004, for leave to reargue those branches of his prior motion which were for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and to waive the filing fee, which were determined by decision and order on motion of this court dated December 13, 2004, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to reargue is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge time to perfect the appeal is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 9, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
SCHMIDT, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and S. MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20251
M/nal
|
2004-07812
In the Matter of Helena Estes, respondent, v Lawrence Glenn, appellant. (Docket No. F-21535/03)
| ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
Appeal by Lawrence Glenn from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 13, 2004. By scheduling order dated November 23, 2004, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.
The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is
ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated November 23, 2004, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before January 31, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20372
E/sl
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-08924
In the Matter of Alicia Beth Falk, respondent, v Mark Charles Owen, appellant. (Docket No. F-13086/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Mark Charles Owen from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated August 24, 2004. By order to show cause dated December 8, 2004, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated October 21, 2004, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2). Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
On the court's own motion and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, and upon the appellant's motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the Law Guardian, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant's counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the Law Guardian, if any, when counsel serves the appellant's brief upon those parties; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act § 1120 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Andrew W. Szczesniak, Esq.
202 Mamaroneck Avenue - Suite 300
White Plains, New York 10601
(914) 682-9282
and it is further,
ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any scheduling order or orders issued pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
H. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, RIVERA and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20291
S/sl
|
2004-05616, 2004-05617
In the Matter of Joan Marie Fotiades, deceased. Gregory Fotiades, petitioner-respondent; David Moskoff, appellant; et al., respondent. (File No. 519/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
ORDERED that the order on application of this court dated January 3, 2005, in the above entitled matter is amended by deleting from the caption and the body thereof the words "respondent-respondent" and substituting therefor the words "petitioner-respondent".
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20280
M/nal
|
2003-11115, 2004-07851, 2004-07852 2004-08331, 2004-08333 In the Matter of LeVonn G. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Cecelia G. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. N-11117/02)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Cecelia G. from three orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated October 23, 2003, July 23, 2004, and August 2, 2004, respectively, and two orders of the same court entered August 13, 2004, and August 16, 2004, respectively. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on November 29, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the respondent's time to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 14, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20281
M/nal
|
2004-08688 In the Matter of Jane Grosso, respondent, v Michael Grosso, appellant. (Docket No. F-20666-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Michael Grosso from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 26, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on January 6, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the respondent's brief shall be served and filed within 45 days of the date of this order.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20391
J/sl
|
2004-08858 In the Matter of Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc., petitioner, v State University of New York at Stony Brook, et al., respondents.
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to file a brief in a proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondents' brief which was submitted to the Clerk of this court is accepted for filing.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20313
S/sl
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
STEPHEN G. CRANE
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.
|
2004-00816 In the Matter of John Hinspeter, petitioner, v John M. Leventhal, etc., respondent.
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the petitioner, a State inmate under sentence for conviction of a crime, for leave to reargue his application pursuant to CPLR 1101 for permission to prosecute the above-entitled proceeding as a poor person, and to waive the filing fee, which application was denied by decision and order on motion of this court dated May 4, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to pay the filing fee in accordance with the prior orders of this court.
PRUDENTI, P.J., KRAUSMAN, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M19986
M/nal
|
2004-07963 In the Matter of Deborah Linksman, respondent, v Charles Linksman, appellant. (Docket No. F-5595/03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Charles Linksman from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 18, 2004. By decision and order on motion of this court dated January 5, 2005, the following attorney was assigned as counsel on the appeal:
Arza R. Feldman, Esq.
626 EAB Plaza
West Tower - 6th Floor
Uniondale, New York 11556
(516) 522-2828
Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this court dated January 5, 2005, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20341
CF/
|
2004-04893 In the Matter of Michael Mantila, respondent, v Jennifer Mantila, appellant. (Docket No. V-3567-03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated June 14, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20254
M/nal
|
2004-04756 In the Matter of Bertha Y. Marti, appellant, v Pedro M. Marti, respondent. (Docket No. F-5958/02)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Bertha Y. Marti from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 23, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on November 8, 2004, and the respondent's brief was served and filed on December 23, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the appellant's time to serve and file a reply brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 17, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20362
M/nal
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-04640 In the Matter of Francisco R. (Anonymous), Jr. Miracle Makers, Inc., et al., petitioners-respondents; Melissa Louisa G. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Docket No. B-1440-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Melissa Louisa G. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 22, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on November 4, 2004, and the law guardian's brief was served and filed on December 22, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that time of the respondent Miracle Makers, Inc., to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.
H. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, RIVERA and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20285
M/nal
|
2004-01436 In the Matter of Lauren R. (Anonymous). Child Protective Services, respondent; Denise R. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. NN-18086/03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Denise R. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 27, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on December 10, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the law guardian's time to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 28, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20293
M/nal
|
2004-07694 In the Matter of Madeline Ramos, appellant, v James Andino, respondent. (Docket No. V-3581/99)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Madeline Ramos from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated July 30, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on January 4, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that within 45 days of the date of this order, the briefs of the respondent(s) and the Law Guardian, if any, in the above-entitled appeal, shall be served and filed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20317
M/nal
|
2004-05880 In the Matter of Wanda Riccio, respondent, v Paul Riccio, appellant. (Docket No. V-284-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Paul Riccio from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated June 7, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 14, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20318
S/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-05880 In the Matter of Wanda Riccio, respondent, v Paul Riccio, appellant. (Docket No. V-284-03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
On the court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that its decision and order on motion dated January 7, 2005, in the above-entitled matter is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order on motion is substituted therefor:
Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated June 7, 2004, and to stay enforcement of the order pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge time is referred to the Clerk of this court to issue a scheduling order pursuant to section 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20347
S/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-00689 In the Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc., appellant, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast, et al., respondents. (Appeal No. 1) (Index No. 7921/03) 2004-00703 In the Matter of Richard Feuerman, et al., appellants, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast, et al., respondents. (Appeal No. 2) (Index No. 7805/03) 2004-00713 In the Matter of Croton Watershed Clean Water Coalition, Inc., et al., appellants, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast, et al., respondents. (Appeal No. 3) (Index No. 7847/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
On the court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that its decision and order on motion dated January 5, 2005, in the above-entitled matter is amended by deleting from item (2), in the first decretal paragraph thereof the words "page 12 ending with '40 C.F.R. Part 130.7'", and substituting therefor the words "page 11 ending with 'its habitat'".
COZIER, J.P., RITTER, LUCIANO and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20365
Y/sl
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-10431 In the Matter of Eric Sprauer, respondent, v Maryann Borelli, appellant. (Docket Nos. V-00973-98, V-00974-98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion by Counsel to be Relieved of Assignment - Family Court |
Motion by counsel assigned to represent the appellant in a proceeding before the Family Court, Westchester County, to be relieved, for the assignment of new counsel to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated September 1, 2004, and to grant the appellant leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition to or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to relieve counsel is granted and counsel assigned by the Family Court is relieved from representing the appellant on the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that counsel shall serve a copy of this decision and order upon the appellant on or before January 26, 2005, by one of the methods specified in CPLR 2103(c) and shall file proof of such service with this court; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which seek assignment of new counsel to represent the appellant on the appeal and leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person are denied with leave to the appellant to renew, on or before February 16, 2005, upon the submission of proper papers establishing that she is entitled to poor person relief and indicating that the appellant is interested in pursuing the appeal.
H. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, RIVERA and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20277
M/nal
|
2004-09334, 2004-09336, 2004-09339 In the Matter of Jerome Marcel T. (Anonymous), Jr. Westchester County Department of Social Services, respondent; Demetria W. (Anonymous), appellant. In the Matter of James Devon P. (Anonymous), Jr. Westchester County Department of Social Services, respondent; Demetria W. (Anonymous), appellant. In the Matter of Shanequa Romelle E. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, respondent; Demetria W. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket Nos. B-6085-03, B-6081-03, B-6087-03 )
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Demetria W. from three orders of the Family Court, Westchester County, all dated September 7, 2004. By decision and order on motion of this court dated January 5, 2005, the following attorney was assigned as counsel on the appeals:
David M. Rosoff, Esq.
550 Mamaroneck Avenue - Suite 305
Harrison, New York 10528
(914) 835-6700
Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this court dated January 5, 2004, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6313 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20284
M/nal
|
2004-07028 In the Matter of Keith Van Nooten, respondent, v Ebony Gwendolyn Lawrence, appellant. (Docket No. V-17259-02)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Ebony Gwendolyn Lawrence from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 4, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on January 6, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that within 45 days of the date of this order, the briefs of the respondent(s) and the Law Guardian, if any, in the above-entitled appeal, shall be served and filed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20286
M/nal
|
2004-08156, 2004-08157 In the Matter of Teresa J. Vinson, respondent, v Melvin Vinson, appellant. (Docket No. F-09609-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Melvin Vinson from two orders of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated May 18, 2004, and August 6, 2004, respectively. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeals is enlarged until February 16, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20287
M/nal
|
2004-04858 In the Matter of Jabari W. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. D-20202/03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Jabari W. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 28, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 21, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20259
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2003-07697
The People, etc., respondent, v Luis Abreu, appellant. (Ind. No. 02-00306)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Renewed motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered April 29, 2003, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20072
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.
|
2004-09292 The People, etc., respondent, v James Bolden, appellant.
(Ind. No. 6840/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 7, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
The Legal Aid Society
199 Water Street - 5th Floor
New York, New York 10038
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, FLORIO, H. MILLER and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 A 5606
Downstate Corr. Fac.
Box F
Fishkill, New York 12524
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20263
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-09219
The People, etc., respondent, v Brentnol Britton, appellant. (Ind. No. 2825/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 5, 2004, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20166
F/
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-10498
The People, etc., respondent, v Tyrone Cooke, appellant. (Ind. No. 04-00129)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered November 15, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
David L. Rich, Esq.
175 Main Street - Suite 711-2
White Plains, New York 10601
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
COZIER, J.P., RITTER, LUCIANO, and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 A 6173
Downstate Corr. Fac.
Box F
Fishkill, New York 12524
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20273
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-08318, 2004-08320 The People, etc., respondent, v Ronald Diggs, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 2436-02, 2364-03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion by Counsel to be Relieved |
Motion by assigned counsel to be relieved of an assignment to prosecute appeals from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County, both rendered August 26, 2004. The appellant's motion for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel was granted on November 4, 2004, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:
Robert C. Mitchell, Esq.
Legal Aid Society of Suffolk County - Appeals Bureau
Post Office Box 1697
Riverhead, New York 11901-3398
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the former assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals:
Andrew S. Worgan, Esq.
30 Colby Drive
Kings Park, New York 11754
and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy if the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeals is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeals expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.), and written directions.
FLORIO, ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 R 3906
Ulster Corr. Fac.
Box 800
Napanoch, New York 12458
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20268
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-10469 The People, etc., respondent, v Maurice Dudley, appellant. (Ind. No. 1385/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 to extend his time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 18, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant's time to take an appeal from the judgment is extended and the appellant's motion papers are deemed a timely notice of appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 18, 2004.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20278
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
1999-05737 The People, etc., respondent, v Raheim Durden, appellant. (Ind. No. 13508/97)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the respondent to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 17, 1999.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[f]; CPL 470.60[1]).
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20258
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-06398
The People, etc., respondent, v Marilu Fischetti, appellant. (Ind. No. 1588/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 28, 2004, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth (1) the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel, and (2) if on bail before conviction, the amount and source of the bail money, and if bail was the appellant's own money, what happened to the same after conviction.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M19477
F/
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-09511 The People, etc., respondent, v Thomas Frizalone, appellant. (Ind. No. 2550/99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a determination of the County Court, Nassau County, dated October 4, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the County Court and, pursuant to Correction Law § 168-n (3), his status as a poor person and the counsel assigned to represent him before the County Court, Nassau County, continues on appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that the filing fee is waived (see CPLR 1103[d]); and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
SANTUCCI, J.P., LUCIANO, RIVERA, and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20267
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2003-05144
The People, etc., respondent, v Luis Glas, appellant. (Ind. No. 2930/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 27, 2003, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20275
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
1999-10275 The People, etc., respondent, v Jeronimo Gordon, appellant. (Ind. No. 10964/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the respondent to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 15, 1999.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[f]; CPL 470.60[1]).
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20266
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2003-10603
The People, etc., respondent, v Darrell Hunter, appellant. (Ind. No. 2/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 8, 2003, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20276
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
1999-10855 The People, etc., respondent, v Jahmeel Ibraheem, appellant. (Ind. No. 7952/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the respondent to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 28, 1999.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[f]; CPL 470.60[1]).
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20309
PL/sl
|
2002-05397 The People, etc., respondent, v Jeffrey Keys, appellant. (Ind. No. 7320/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 5, 2002.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 4, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20279
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-09507
The People, etc., respondent, v Gary Lambert, appellant. (Ind. No. 6919/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 19, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel, and separate motion by the Legal Aid Society to be assigned as counsel on the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motions are granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
The Legal Aid Society
199 Water Street - 5th Floor
New York, New York 10038
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 A 5877
P.O. Box F
Fishkill, New York 12524
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20305
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-09463
The People, etc., respondent, v Julio Martinez, appellant. (Ind. No. 04-00630)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered October 21, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Warren S. Hecht, Esq.
118-21 Queens Blvd.
Forest Hills, New York 11375
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
Please make inquiry to the State Inmate Locator
New York State Department of Correctional Services
Telephone: (518) 457-0043
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20253
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-10331
The People, etc., plaintiff, v Elving Matos, defendant. (Ind. No. 640-03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Leave to Serve Late Notice of Appeal, for Poor Person Relief & to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the defendant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered February 23, 2004, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 R 0797
Franklin Corr. Fac.
62 Bare Hill Road - Box 10
Malone, New York 12953
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20006
F/
ROBERT A. LIFSON, J.
|
2004-10422 The People, etc., plaintiff, v Ashton Nedrick, defendant. (Ind. No. 693/86)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 8, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied.
ROBERT A. LIFSON
Associate Justice
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20218
R/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
1998-06071, 1998-06073 The People, etc., respondent, v Ronald Nicholson, appellant.
(Ind. Nos. 98-00124, 98-00249)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se on appeals from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County, both rendered June 16, 1998, in effect, for leave to reargue a prior motion for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, which was determined by decision and order on motion of this court dated October 1, 1998 and to provide the appellant pro se with a copy of the transcripts of the sentencing minutes.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is, in effect, for leave to renew a prior motion for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted and upon renewal, the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any hearing on the motion, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of the proceeding set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Salvatore Adamo
350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3304
New York, New York 10118-0069
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to provide the appellant pro se with a copy of the transcripts of the sentencing minutes is denied, as such minutes will be provided to assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20306
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-10103
The People, etc., respondent, v James Sholar, appellant. (Ind. No. 00-00737)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered November 8, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Greg Rinckey, Esq.
3 Wembly Court
Albany, New York 12205
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 R 4596
Camp Pharsalia
496 Center Road
South Plymouth, New York 13844
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20303
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-09070
The People, etc., respondent, v Xavier Smith, appellant. (Ind. No. 04-00483)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered October 4, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
John Savoca, Esq.
One Barker Street - Suite 135
White Plains, New York 10601
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 A 5332
Downstate Corr. Fac.
Box F
Fishkill, New York 12524
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20264
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-06395
The People, etc., respondent, v Robert Tocci, appellant. (Ind. No. 2914/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered July 16, 2004, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20269
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-10385 The People, etc., respondent, v Tarik Tutt, appellant. (Ind. No. 2481-03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 to extend his time to take an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 1, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant's time to take an appeal from the judgment is extended and the appellant's motion papers are deemed a timely notice of appeal from the judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 1, 2004.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20256
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2003-06457
The People, etc., respondent, v Clemencio Waal, appellant. (Ind. No. 3374/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 20, 2003, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth (1) the appellant's full financial situation including all assets, both real and personal, as well as any and all sources of income before conviction, and (2) the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20248
F/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-01031 The People, etc., respondent, v Mark C. Weekes, appellant. (Ind. No. 00-00218)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se to relieve counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered December 31, 2003, and for the assignment of new counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20307
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
|
2004-10299
The People, etc., respondent, v Darren Williams, a/k/a Darren Flowers, appellant. (Ind. No. 04-00444)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered October 28, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Alex Smith, Esq.
41 Dolson Avenue
P.O. Box 578
Middletown, New York 10940
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, FLORIO, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 A 5841
Downstate Corr. Fac.
Box F
Fishkill, New York 12524
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20261
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2003-03220
The People, etc., respondent, v Ronnie Williams, appellant. (Ind. No. 1660-02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Renewed motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered March 25, 2003, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth the amount and source of counsel fees paid to retained counsel.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20249
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.
|
2004-10423 The People, etc., plaintiff, v Ralph Wyman, defendant. (Ind. No. 3508/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the defendant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 to extend his time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 20, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied (CPL 460.30 (1)).
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, S. MILLER, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M20247
C/sl
SONDRA MILLER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-09318
The People, etc., ex rel. Milton Morales, petitioner, v Joseph V. Smith, etc., respondent.
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the petitioner, a State inmate under sentence for conviction of a crime, pursuant to CPLR 1101 for permission to prosecute the above-entitled proceeding as a poor person.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the filing fee has not been paid within 120 days from the date of this order the proceeding shall be dismissed (see CPLR 1101[d]).
The allegations of merit contained in the petitioner's affidavit in support of the motion fail to establish that the proceeding is not frivolous (see CPLR 1101[a]).
S. MILLER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court