Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23358
E/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-06079 Aames Capital Corporation, respondent, v John Davidsohn, appellant. (Index No. 6565/97)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 12, 2004, to enlarge the record on appeal to include certain documents and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal, and cross motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal for failure to timely perfect.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until April 29, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the cross motion is denied.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23335
R/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2005-02318 Jacob R. Biegel, etc., respondent. v Frank Gangemi, et al., appellants.
(Index No. 38881/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellants John Gangemi and Theresa Tortorici to stay enforcement of so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 2, 2005, as directed them to appear for depositions, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
COZIER, J.P., RITTER, KRAUSMAN and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23339
S/sl
|
2004-06974, 2004-08866 Richard Brownrigg, respondent, v New York City Housing Authority, appellant. (Index No. 24807/97)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 19, 2004, and an order of the same court dated September 14, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until April 18, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23350
A/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-10697 Peter Buchman, respondent, v Kathleen O'Neill, appellant.
(Index No. 14949/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay enforcement of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 19, 2004, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23348
A/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2003-09285 James DiGiacomo, et al., respondents- appellants, v Cabrini Medical Center, et al., appellants-respondents. (Index No. 8324/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by Jones Hirsch Connors & Bull, counsel for the appellants-respondents, for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant-respondent Cabrini Medical Center on appeals and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 15, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23366
S/sl
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2004-05680, 2004-08150 Sinclair Haberman, et al., appellant-respondent, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach, et al., respondents-appellants. (Index No. 1138/04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
On the court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that its decision and order on motion dated November 1, 2004, in the above-entitled case is amended by adding thereto after the first decretal paragraph the following decretal paragraph:
"ORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this court dated August 6, 2004, is recalled and vacated; and it is further,"
ADAMS, J.P., KRAUSMAN, SPOLZINO and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23336
R/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-10427 Vergie Jenkins-Watson, appellant, v Golabi Holdings, LLC, et al., respondents.
(Index No. 35984/04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 24, 2004, as a poor person, for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers, and to waive the filing fee.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied with leave to renew upon the submission of proper papers, including a financial affidavit of the appellant setting forth all her assets, including real and personal property, any and all sources of income, and itemized expenses.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23331
PL/sl
|
2004-09090
Estelle Leiner, plaintiff-respondent, v New York Community Hospital of Brooklyn, Inc., defendant-respondent, Boris Peysin, defendant-appellant. (Index No. 40816/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the defendant-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 20, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the defendant-respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 13, 2005, and the defendant-respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23334
R/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, JJ.
|
2005-00972 Lauren Levinstim, respondent-appellant, v Katherine Parker, appellant-respondent.
(Index No. 17103/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the appellant-respondent to dismiss a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 6, 2005, on the ground that the respondent-appellant is not aggrieved by the order.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the cross appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the respondent-appellant is not aggrieved by the order entered January 6, 2005 (see CPLR 5511).
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI and KRAUSMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23364
E/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-03078 Angel Mendez, etc., appellant, v Kyung Yoo, etc., et al., defendants, St. Vincent's Medical Center, respondent. (Appeal No. 1) 2004-04949 Angel Mendez, etc., respondent, v Kyung Yoo, etc., et al., appellants, et al., defendants. (Appeal No. 2) (Index No. 53342/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by Angel Mendez on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 9, 2003 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2004-04949), and an appeal from an order of the same court dated September 15, 2003 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2004-03078), to consolidate the appeals and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2003, separate motion by Kung Yoo and Jing Zhang to consolidate the appeals and to enlarge their time to perfect their appeal from the order dated July 9, 2003, and separate motion by St. Vincent Medical Center to dismiss the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2003, for failure to timely perfect, or alternatively, in effect, to enlarge its time to perfect its appeal from the order dated July 9, 2003.
ORDERED that the branches of the motions which are to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals are granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that plaintiff's time to perfect the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2003, is enlarged until May 15, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the time of Kung Yoo and Jing Zhang and St. Vincent Medical Center to perfect their appeals from the order dated July 9, 2003, is enlarged until June 16, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants' respective briefs must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branches of the motions which are to consolidate the appeals are denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion of St. Vincent Medical Center is otherwise denied.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23361
E/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-06973 Philip Orlando, appellant, v City of New York, respondent, et al., defendant.
(Index No. 17869/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 7, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 29, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23357
O/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-07017 Francine Russo, respondent, v Garden Homes Management Corporation, et al., defendants, Pathmark Stores, Inc., appellant. (Index No. 20009/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 21, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before April 7, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before April 7, 2005, the court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23337
S/sl
|
2004-09417, 2005-00174
Alex Stylianou, et al., appellants, v Incorporated Village of Old Field, respondent.
(Index No. 14453/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 27, 2004, and December 2, 2004, respectively.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before April 11, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23347
A/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-10818 In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, appellant, v Issac Lichtenstein, respondent; Marie Celestine, et al., proposed additional respondents.
(Index No. 16938/04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to stay an arbitration proceeding pending between the parties, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 21, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23360
O/sl
DANIEL F. LUCIANO, J.P.
STEPHEN G. CRANE
STEVEN W. FISHER
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-03456 In the Matter of Stuart D. Baker, et al., appellants, v Patrick A. Heaney, etc., et al., respondents.
(Index No. 23873/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellants on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 29, 2004, which was determined by decision and order of this court dated February 22, 2005, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this court, and separate motion by the appellants, in effect, to continue an injunction granted by decision and order on motion of this court dated June 10, 2004, pending hearing and determination of the motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and determination of the appeal by the Court of Appeals, if leave is granted, or, pending determination by the Court of Appeals of any application for leave to appeal to that court from the decision and order dated February 22, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to continue the injunction granted by the decision and order on motion of this court dated June 10, 2004, is granted to the extent that the injunction is continued pending determination by the Court of Appeals of any application for leave to appeal to that court from the decision and order of this court dated February 22, 2005, and that motion is otherwise denied.
LUCIANO, J.P., CRANE, FISHER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23355
E/sl
SONDRA MILLER, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2005-01958, 2005-02147 In the Matter of Estate of Margaret A. McKeown. Kevin McKeown, appellant; Thomas McKeown, et al., respondents. (File No. 2239/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant on an appeal from two orders of the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County, both dated January 12, 2005, inter alia, to disqualify the counsel for the respondent Thomas McKeown.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
S. MILLER, J.P., SANTUCCI, KRAUSMAN and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23343
S/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-08688 In the Matter of Jane Grosso, respondent, v Michael Grosso, appellant. (Docket No. F-20666-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Michael Grosso from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 26, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on January 6, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the respondent's time to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until April 6, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23345
S/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-01828, 2004-06412, 2004-06413 In the Matter of Shahzada Q. Mohammad, respondent, v Abdul Q. Mohammad, appellant. (Docket Nos. V-26688/99, V-27057/99)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Abdul Q. Mohammad from three orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 26, 2004, July 2, 2004, and June 28, 2004, respectively. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on January 28, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the Law Guardian's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 2, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23332
S/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-05348 In the Matter of Nicholas E. Purpura, petitioner, v Rachel Adams, etc., respondent. (Index No. 5769/85)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition. Cross motion by the respondent Barbara Purpura to dismiss the proceeding and to impose sanctions on the petitioner. By decision and order on motion dated November 30, 2004, the petitioner was given 120 days to pay the filing fee or the proceeding would be dismissed and the cross motion was held in abeyance in the interim. By letter dated March 22, 2005, the petitioner withdrew the proceeding.
Upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the cross motion which is to impose sanctions on the petitioner is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the cross motion is otherwise denied as academic.
COZIER, J.P., RITTER, KRAUSMAN and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23268
M/nal
|
2005-01540, 2005-01541
In the Matter of Jennifer R. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Steven R. (Anonymous), et al., appellants. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Steven R. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Steven R. (Anonymous), et al., appellants. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. B-11328-03, B-11329-03 B-11334-03, B-11335-03)
| ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
Separate appeals by Steven R. and Gordana Kondon R. from two orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 18, 2004, and January 31, 2005, respectively. By scheduling order dated February 22, 2005, the appellant Steven R. was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or
(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or
(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals.
The appellant Steven R. has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is
ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals by Steven R. in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated February 22, 2005, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before April 11, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23272
M/nal
|
2005-01485
In the Matter of Flor Elena Rospigliosi, appellant, v Luis Abbate, respondent. (Docket No. F-06133/02)
| ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
Appeal by Flor Elena Rospigliosi from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 6, 2005. By scheduling order dated February 22, 2005, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or
(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.
The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is
ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated February 22, 2005, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before April 11, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23365
S/sl
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
STEPHEN G. CRANE
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.
|
2005-01135 In the Matter of United Water New Rochelle, Inc., appellant, v James R. King, etc., respondent.
(Index No. 11893/04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
On the court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that its decision and order on motion dated March 25, 2005, in the above-entitled matter is amended by deleting from the decretal paragraph thereof the date "April 29, 2005," and substituting therefor the date "May 6, 2005".
ADAMS, J.P., S. MILLER, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23342
S/sl
|
2003-08027
The People, etc., respondent, v Kevin Bailey, appellant. (Ind. No. 5440/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 13, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 18, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23349
F/
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-01199 The People, etc., respondent, v Virgil Russell Booker, appellant. (Ind. No. 621/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 16, 2004, and to be furnished with a copy of the typewritten transcript of the proceedings, if any.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the District Attorney shall file the transcript of the proceedings, if any, and the Clerk of this court shall deliver those minutes to the person in charge of the institution wherein the appellant is incarcerated for examination by the appellant; the transcript shall be returned to this court when the appellant files the supplemental brief or informs this court that no supplemental brief will be filed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.
Upon delivering the minutes to the institution, the Clerk of this court shall advise the appellant of the date by which the minutes are to be returned and the brief filed.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO, and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's Address:
04 A 0613
Auburn Corr. Fac.
Box 618
Auburn, New York 13021
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23356
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
|
2002-10896 The People, etc., respondent, v Edward Brown, appellant. (Ind. No. 3339/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
On the court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this court, dated May 7, 2004, which granted the appellant's motion for leave to serve and file a supplemental pro se brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 22, 2002, is recalled and vacated; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's motion for leave to file a supplemental pro se brief is denied.
The appellant has failed to file a supplemental pro se brief although afforded sufficient opportunity to do so.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23325
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2004-11233 The People, etc., respondent, v Shawn Clark, appellant. (Ind. No. 2403-03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dispense With Printing Free Minutes |
Motion by the appellant for leave to dispense with printing on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered December 2, 2004, and for a copy of the typewritten transcripts of the stenographic minutes, without charge.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to dispense with printing is denied as unnecessary (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][viii]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify and file two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); retained counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the Trial Court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for retained counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that, upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide counsel with a copy of the pre-sentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that retained counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged. Retained counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions.
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Attorney's Address:
Patrick Michael Megaro, Esq.
Scott Brettschneider, P.C.
165 EAB Plaza
West Tower, 6th Floor
Uniondale, New York 11556
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23318
F/
A.GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
|
2005-01291 The People, etc., respondent, v Robert P. Coffey, appellant. (Ind. No. 1927-89)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a determination of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated January 11, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the Supreme Court and, pursuant to Correction Law § 168-n (3), his status as a poor person and the counsel assigned to represent him before the County Court, Suffolk County, continues on appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that the filing fee is waived (see CPLR 1103[d]); and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23354
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
|
2005-00731 The People, etc., appellant, DECISION & ORDER v Jemel Goode, respondent. (Ind. No. 04-00379)
| ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondent pro se for leave to respond to an appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Rockland County, dated January 18, 2005, as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as attorney for the defendant to respond to the appeal from said order:
James Licata
Office of the Public Defender
11 New Hemstead Road
New City, New York 10956-3664
and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent is directed to serve one copy of his brief and to file nine copies thereof.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23352
F/
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2003-04973 The People, etc., respondent, v Shawn Grant, appellant. (Ind. No. 00-00577)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion Pro se to Relieve Counsel of Assignment |
Motion by the appellant pro se to relieve counsel assigned to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered May 16, 2003, and for assignment of new counsel. The appellant's motion to dispense with printing and for the assignment of counsel was granted on December 12, 2003, and the following named attorney was assigned to prosecute the appeal:
Ethel P. Ross, Esq.
P.O. Box 347-787
Route 35
Cross River, New York 10580
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; previously assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned to prosecute the appeal:
Brendan O'Meara, Esq.
10 Winchester Avenue - 1B
Yonkers, New York 10710
and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the pre-sentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 et seq.) and written directions.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO, and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23327
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2000-07754 The People, etc., respondent, v Elysa Green, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 00-00068)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the respondent to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered July 7, 2000.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[f]; CPL 470.60[1]).
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23324
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2003-08030 The People, etc., respondent, v Bethel Jones, appellant. (Ind. No. 8374/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 14, 2003, and to be furnished with a copy of the typewritten transcript of the proceedings, if any.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the District Attorney shall file the transcript of the proceedings, if any, and the Clerk of this court shall deliver those minutes to the person in charge of the institution wherein the appellant is incarcerated for examination by the appellant; the transcript shall be returned to this court when the appellant files the supplemental brief or informs this court that no supplemental brief will be filed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.
Upon delivering the minutes to the institution, the Clerk of this court shall advise the appellant of the date by which the minutes are to be returned and the brief filed.
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's Address:
03 A 4635
Sing Sing Corr. Fac.
354 Hunter Street
Ossining, New York 10562
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23312
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2001-03174 The People, etc., respondent, v Thomas Devon Jones, appellant. (Ind. No. 00-01002)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the respondent to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered March 22, 2001.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[f]; CPL 470.60[1]).
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23340
S/sl
|
2002-09185
The People, etc., respondent, v Alan Jordan, appellant. (Ind. No. 10293/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 18, 2002.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 15, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division : Second Judicial Department
M23300
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
|
2005-00687
The People, etc., plaintiff, v Padraic Keating, defendant. (Ind. No. 483/95)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 23, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied.
A. GAIL PRUDENTI
Presiding Justice
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23341
S/sl
|
2002-04912 The People, etc., respondent, v Josiah McTier, appellant. (Ind. No. 3236/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 14, 2002.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 12, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23323
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2005-01371 The People, etc., plaintiff, v Michael Murphy, defendant. (Ind. No. 5524/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the defendant pro se pursuant to CPL 460.30 to extend his time to take an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 11, 2002.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied (see CPL 460.30 [1]).
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23315
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2001-08517 The People, etc., respondent, v John Perez, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 01-00655)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the respondent to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered August 16, 2001.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[f]; CPL 470.60[1]).
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23322
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2005-01162 The People, etc., respondent, v Ujima Robinson, appellant. (Ind. No. 266/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered December 16, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
David Goodman, Esq.
Public Defender
22 Market Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
120 South First Street
Mt. Vernon, New York 10550
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23326
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2003-04405 The People, etc., respondent, v Darlene Sabatino, appellant. (Ind. No. 12/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by Louis J. Galgano, III, Esq., to be substituted as retained counsel, in place of assigned counsel, to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County, rendered April 1, 2003, and to continue the appellant's poor person status on the appeal. The appellant's motion to dispense with printing and for the assignment of counsel was granted on April 7, 2004, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Yasmin Daley-Duncan, Esq.
218 Smith Street
Brooklyn, New York 11201
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to retained counsel:
Louis J. Galgano, III, Esq.
303 Old Tarrytown Road
White Plains, New York 10603
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's poor person status is continued; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged. Retained counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions.
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Retained Attorney:
Louis J. Galgano, III, Esq.
303 Old Tarrytown Road
White Plains, New York 10603
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23314
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2001-06070 The People, etc., respondent, v Jovan Santiago, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 00-01610)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the respondent to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered May 30, 2001.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[f]; CPL 470.60[1]).
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23319
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
|
2005-01290
The People, etc., respondent, v Warren Smith, appellant. (Ind. No. 542-04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered January 5, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Robert C. Mitchell, Esq.
Legal Aid Society of Suffolk County - Appeals Bureau
Post Office Box 1697
Riverhead, New York 11901-3398
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
Downstate Corr. Fac.
Box 445
Fishkill, New York 12524
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23351
F/
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2000-11251 The People, etc., respondent, v Reginald Thomas, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 00-00574)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the respondent to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered October 31, 2000.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[f]; CPL 470.60[1]).
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO, and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23353
F/
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2005-01509
The People, etc., respondent, v Alberto Torres, appellant. (Ind. No. 1541/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 26, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Peter A. Sell, Esq.
324 W. 96th Street #4B
New York, New York 10025
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, MASTRO, and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
439 Beach 22nd Street - Apt. 1B
Far Rockaway, New York 11691
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23321
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2005-00397 The People, etc., respondent, v Julio Velez, appellant. (Ind. No. 03-01735)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered December 9, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Raymond E. Kerno, Esq.
1527 Franklin Avenue
Mineola, New York 11501
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellant's address:
04 A 6809
Sing Sing Corr. Fac.
354 Hunter Street
Ossining, New York 10562
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23317
F/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2005-01882 The People, etc., respondent, v Herbert H. White, appellant. (Ind. No. 81-00051)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a determination of the County Court, Westchester County, dated January 10, 2005, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied as unnecessary, as the appellant was granted leave to proceed as a poor person in the Supreme Court and, pursuant to Correction Law § 168-n (3), his status as a poor person and the counsel assigned to represent him before the County Court, Westchester County, continues on appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that the clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPLR 1102[b]); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that the filing fee is waived (see CPLR 1103[d]); and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SANTUCCI, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court