Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24241
E/sl
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
BARRY A. COZIER
STEPHEN G. CRANE
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2005-01900 Lynn Edelson, et al., appellants, v Placeway Construction Corporation, et al., respondents. (Index No. 19028/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondents Kent Iron Works, Inc., and Omar Molina to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 24, 2005, on the ground that the appellants failed to comply with 22 NYCRR 600.5(d).
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
H. MILLER, J.P., COZIER, CRANE and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24161
PL/sl
|
2004-06633, 2004-06634, 2004-06814 Fairfield Towers Condominium, respondent- appellant, v Fairfield Presidential Associates, et al., appellants-respondents.
(Index No. 19283/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant-respondent Richardson, LLC pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 11, 2003, January 2, 2004, and July 19, 2004, respectively.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants-respondents' time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until June 3, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file its answering brief, including its points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24124
PL/sl
|
2004-07436
Andrea Friedman, et al., appellants, v Stephen H. Marcus, et al., respondents, et al., defendant. (Index No. 7519/98)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 20, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 21, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24246
L/
NANCY E. SMITH, J.P.
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
STEPHEN G. CRANE
REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.
|
2004-06587 Heartland Golf Park, Inc., respondent, v Field Turf International, Inc., et al., appellants (and a third party action). (Index No. 20731/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Withdraw Appeal on Stipulation |
Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 26, 2004.
Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties, dated March 11, 2005, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
SMITH, J.P., LUCIANO, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24200
M/nal
|
2004-08847 David Kaplan, appellant, v Nicole Kaplan, respondent. (Index No. 202833/01)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by David Kaplan from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 30, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on February 18, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the time of the respondent and the law guardian to serve and file their briefs on the appeal is enlarged until May 13, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24235
R/sl
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
BARRY A. COZIER
STEPHEN G. CRANE
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2004-07277 John Kingston, etc., respondent, v Michael Breslin, et al., appellants.
(Index No. 17481/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 27, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until April 25, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted.
H. MILLER, J.P., COZIER, CRANE and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24237
CF/
|
2005-01126 Leibowitz & Cinquemani, D.D.S., P.C., appellant, v Victoria Realty, LLC, respondent. (Index No. 16522/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 23, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24039
PL/sl
|
2004-06351
Bruce Morgan, appellant, v Chong Kwan Jun, et al., respondents. (Index No. 13899/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 16, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 28, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24185
PL/sl
|
2004-03240 Riverside Capital Advisers, Inc., etc., et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v First Secured Capital Corporation, et al., defendants-appellants, Wet Resources Corp., defendant-respondent, et al., defendant; Thomas Donovan, et al., nonparty-appellants. (Appeal No. 1)
2004-06107, 2004-06108, 2004-06109, 2004-06110, 2004-06111, 2004-06843 Riverside Capital Advisers, Inc., etc., et al., respondents, v First Secured Capital Corporation, et al., defendants-appellants, Wet Resources Corp., et al., defendants; Thomas Donovan, et al., nonparty-appellants. (Appeals No. 2 through 6 and 8) 2004-06114 Riverside Capital Advisers, Inc., etc., et al., respondents, v First Secured Capital Corporation, et al., defendants; Thomas Donovan, et al., nonparty- appellants. (Appeal No. 7)
(Index No. 20600/99)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the plaintiff-respondent Winchester Global Trust Company on appeals from eight orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County dated March 9, 2004, May 24, 2004, May 25, 2004 (two orders), June 7, 2004, June 10, 2004, June 16, 2004, and July 27, 2004, respectively, to enlarge its time pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to serve and file a brief on the appeals from the orders dated May 24, 2004 (Appellate Division Docket Number 2004-06107), May 25, 2004 (two orders) (Appellate Division Docket Numbers 2004-06108 and 2004-06109), June 7, 2004 (Appellate Division Docket Number 2004-06110), and June 10, 2004 (Appellate Division Docket Number 2004-06111), respectively.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the movant's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until May 13, 2005, and the movant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellants' time to serve and file their respective reply briefs is enlarged until June 7, 2005, and the appellants' respective reply briefs must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24245
L/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
REINALDO E. RIVERA
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-03358 Christopher L. Serrano, respondent, v Saint Joseph by the Sea High School, etc., et al., appellants. (Index No. 13970/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Withdraw Appeal on Stipulation |
Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 3, 2004.
Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties, dated April 7, 2005, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ADAMS, RIVERA and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24184
PL/sl
|
2005-00616 Evelyn Tyme, plaintiff-respondent, v City of New York, defendant, Arthur J. Schloerb, defendant-appellant, Doreth Blair, defendant-respondent. (Index No. 1040/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 23, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondents' time to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until June 17, 2005, and the respondents' briefs must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24242
R/sl
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
BARRY A. COZIER
STEPHEN G. CRANE
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2004-11102 Kathryn Wolle-Gordon, respondent, v William Eric Gordon, appellant.
(Index No. 5284/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 25, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
H. MILLER, J.P., COZIER, CRANE and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24233
M/nal
|
2005-03530 In the Matter of Davon B. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. E-22481-04)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Davon B. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 7, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24191
M/nal
|
2005-02597 In the Matter of Imani B. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Vernon B. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. N- 21224-04)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Vernon B. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 9, 2005. By decision and order on motion of this court dated April 13, 2005, the following attorney was assigned as counsel on the appeal:
Karl E. Bonheim, Esq.
P.O. Box 145
431 Griffing Avenue
Riverhead, New York 11901
(631) 208-9007
Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this court dated April 13, 2005, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6313 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24230
M/nal
|
2005-03543 In the Matter of Sophia B. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, petitioner-respondent; Joanne B. (Anonymous), appellant; et al., respondent. (Docket No. N-3344-04 )
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Joanne B. from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated March 23, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24212
M/nal
|
2004-04643 In the Matter of Corey C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. D-19616-03 )
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Corey C. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 19, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 27, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24197
M/nal
|
2005-00403, 2005-00404 In the Matter of Michelle Castillo, respondent, v Juan Castillo, appellant. (Docket No. F-00180/00)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Juan Castillo from two orders of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated September 7, 2004, and December 9, 2004, respectively. By decision and order on motion of this court dated April 13, 2005, the following attorney was assigned as counsel on the appeals:
Arlene Lewis, Esq.
P.O. Box 219
Blauvett, New York 10913
(845) 359-2149
Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this court dated April 13, 2005, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6313 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24229
M/nal
|
2005-03503 In the Matter of Chana Cohen, respondent, v Efraim Cohen, appellant. (Docket No. F-31759-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Efraim Cohen from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 18, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24203
M/nal
|
2003-10701 In the Matter of Kevin W. Cox, appellant, v Julie Cox, respondent. (Docket No. F-00432-96/03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Kevin W. Cox from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated August 22, 2003. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on April 12, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the respondent's brief shall be served and filed within 45 days of the date of this order.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24186
M/nal
|
2004-09470 In the Matter of Kathleen Cutter, respondent, v Harry Feldman, appellant. (Docket No. O-23574/03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Harry Feldman from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 15, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on April 15, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that within 45 days of the date of this order, the briefs of the respondent(s) and the Law Guardian, if any, in the above-entitled appeal, shall be served and filed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24202
M/nal
|
2004-06859, 2004-06861, 2004-06862 2004-06863, 2004-06864, 2004-06865 In the Matter of Marc David D. (Anonymous). St. Vincent's Services, et al., respondents; Ginette P. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Samuel D. (Anonymous). St. Vincent's Services, et al., respondents; Ginette P. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2) In the Matter of Shaminique Iris P. (Anonymous). St. Vincent's Services, et al., respondents; Ginette P. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 3) In the Matter of Elijah Pierre D. (Anonymous). St. Vincent's Services, et al., respondents; Ginette P. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 4) In the Matter of Ashley D. (Anonymous). St. Vincent's Services, et al., respondents; Ginette P. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 5) In the Matter of Tanisha Lovinia D. (Anonymous). St. Vincent's Services, et al., respondents; Ginette P. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 6) (Docket Nos. B-10122-01, B-10123-01, B-10124-01 B-10125-01, B-10127-01, B-10128-01)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Ginette P. from six orders of the Family Court, Kings County, all dated June 25, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on February 23, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the time of the respondent and the law guardian to serve and file their briefs on the appeals is enlarged until May 13, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24228
M/nal
|
2005-03391 In the Matter of Michael Fein, appellant, v Leigh Gilchrist (Fein), respondent. (Docket No. F-17325-04)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Michael Fein from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 4, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24232
M/nal
|
2005-03551, 2005-03552 In the Matter of Ziva Giliya, appellant, v Steven Warren, respondent. (Docket No. P-00881/92)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Ziva Giliya from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 4, 2005, and March 7, 2005, respectively. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that they have been ordered, the date thereof and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24195
M/nal
|
2004-10031, 2004-10032, 2004-10033 In the Matter of Alfredo H. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket Nos. E-01625-04, D-21240-02, D-09942-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Alfredo H. from three orders of the Family Court, Kings County, all dated October 12, 2004. By decision and order on motion of this court dated April 12, 2005, the following attorney was assigned as counsel on the appeals:
Francine Shraga, Esq.
869 East 12th Street
Brooklyn, New York 11230
(718) 377-4894
Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this court dated April 12, 2005, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6313 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24198
M/nal
|
2004-07873, 2004-07874
In the Matter of H. (Anonymous) Children. Episcopal Social Services, appellant; Ada H. (Anonymous), et al., respondents. (Docket Nos. B-16066/01, B-25284/02, B-25285/02, B-25286/02)
| ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
Appeals by Episcopal Social Services from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 31, 2004, and August 13, 2004, respectively. The transcripts were received by the appellant on February 7, 2005, and pursuant to the scheduling order of this court dated September 15, 2004, the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding was to be perfected within 60 days of the date of the receipt of the transcripts. The appeals have not been perfected. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is
ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated September 15, 2004, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 4, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24190
M/nal
|
2005-02024
In the Matter of Victoria Lutz, respondent, v Bruce Goldstone, appellant. (Docket No. F-00115-00)
| ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
Appeal by Bruce Goldstone from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated January 6, 2005. By scheduling order dated March 14, 2005, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or
(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.
The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is
ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated March 14, 2005, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 4, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24210
M/nal
|
2004-10089, 2004-10091 In the Matter of Marcus M. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. E-4186/04)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Marcus M. from two orders of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated October 19, 2004, and November 5, 2004, respectively. By decision and order on motion of this court dated April 11, 2005, the following attorney was assigned as counsel on the appeals:
Catherine S. Bridge, Esq.
1358 Clove Road
Staten Island, New York 10301
(718) 448-9600
Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this court dated April 11, 2005, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6313 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24226
M/nal
|
2005-01423 In the Matter of Dina Makhnovskaya, respondent, v Mikhail Nisenbaum, appellant. (Docket No. F-07391/03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Mikhail Nisenbaum from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 19, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24196
M/nal
|
2005-01774 In the Matter of Raul Matos, appellant, v Nancy Cruz, respondent. (Docket No. F-06868-02)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Raul Matos from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 14, 2004. By decision and order on motion of this court dated April 13, 2005, the appellant's motion for leave to prosecute the above-entitled appeal as a poor person was denied. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4), above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24221
M/nal
|
2005-03482 In the Matter of Sarah Therese McB. (Anonymous), Jewish Child Cars Association, respondent; Maryellen McB. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. B-02032/00)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Maryellen McB. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 16, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24239
S/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.
|
2004-11238 In the Matter of Norris J. McLaurin, respondent, v New York State Board of Parole, appellant. (Index No. 2708/04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
On the court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that its decision and order on motion dated March 22, 2005, in the above-entitled matter is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order on motion is substituted therefor:
Motion by the respondent pro se to waive the filing fee on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated October 28, 2004, and to vacate any automatic stay pursuant to CPLR 5519(a)(1) which may be in effect, or for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive the filing fee is denied as unnecessary; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, LUCIANO and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24215
M/nal
|
2005-03402 In the Matter of Rohan McM. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. D-3825/04)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Rohan McM. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 10, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24194
M/nal
|
2004-03428 In the Matter of Kenneth Moreno, respondent, v Maria Cruz, appellant. (Docket No. V-09793/99)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Maria Cruz from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 18, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on April 13, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that within 45 days of the date of this order, the briefs of the respondent(s) and the Law Guardian, if any, in the above-entitled appeal, shall be served and filed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24216
M/nal
|
2005-03390 In the Matter of Salvatore Morocco, appellant, v Tara Caporicci, respondent. (Docket No. V-11289-04)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Salvatore Morocco from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 16, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23526
M/nal
|
2005-00300, 2005-00601, 2005-00602, 2005-00603 In the Matter of Jimmy Jeremie R. (Anonymous). Heart Share Human Services, respondent; Hilda C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Haydee R. (Anonymous). Heart Share Human Services, respondent; Hilda C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2) In the Matter of Tatiana W. (Anonymous). Heart Share Human Services, respondent; Hilda C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 3) In the Matter of Iesha W. (Anonymous). Heart Share Human Services, respondent; Hilda C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 4) (Docket Nos. B-08381-03, B-08382-03 B-10482-03, B-10483-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Hilda C. from four orders of the Family Court, Kings County, all dated November 17, 2004. By decision and order on motion of this court dated March 23, 2005, the following attorney was assigned as counsel on the appeals:
Francine Shraga, Esq.
869 East 12th Street
Brooklyn, New York 11230
(718) 377-4894
Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeals; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this court dated March 23, 2005, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6313 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24201
M/nal
|
2004-11002 In the Matter of Linda Recard, appellant, v Anthony Polite, respondent. (Docket No. F-06975/00)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Linda Recard from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 15, 2004. By decision and order on motion of this court dated April 11, 2005, the appellant's motion for leave to reargue a prior motion to prosecute the appeal as a poor person was denied. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 20 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4), above, has been taken within 20 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24189
M/nal
|
2005-01966
In the Matter of Nelson Rodriguez, appellant, v Zamarra Rodriguez, respondent. (Docket No. V-16328-04)
| ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
Appeal by Nelson Rodriguez from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated December 20, 2004. By scheduling order dated March 14, 2005, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or
(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.
The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is
ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated March 14, 2005, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before May 4, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24219
M/nal
|
2005-03505 In the Matter of Maithsa Edourd S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Rose P. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Ernesto G. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Rose P. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-06160-04, N-06161-04)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Rose P. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 23, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24188
M/nal
|
2004-07397 In the Matter of Chauncey T. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. D-06890-04)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Chauncey T. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 2, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 20, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24192
M/nal
|
2004-06611, 2004-06613 In the Matter of Gail Tabernuro, respondent, v Reginald Jones, appellant. (Docket No. V-12964-02, V-27181-01, O-34251-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Reginald Jones from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated July 8, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on April 12, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that within 45 days of the date of this order, the briefs of the respondent(s) and the Law Guardian, if any, in the above-entitled appeals, shall be served and filed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24225
M/nal
|
2005-03529 In the Matter of Kristine J. Thomas, respondent, v Gregory M. Thomas, appellant. (Docket No. O-3208-05)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Gregory M. Thomas from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated March 4, 2005. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M23612
M/nal
|
2004-06019, 2004-06021 In the Matter of Belinda Watson, respondent, v James Watson, appellant. (Docket No. F-0577-01)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by James Watson from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated June 21, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on February 1, 2005. By decision and order on motion of this court dated March 30, 2005, the following attorney was assigned to represent the respondent on the appeals:
Yasmin Daley-Duncan, Esq.
218 Smith Street
Brooklyn, New York 11201
(718) 284-3575
Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the respondent's time to serve and file a brief on the appeals is enlarged until May 12, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24236
R/sl
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
BARRY A. COZIER
STEPHEN G. CRANE
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2002-03441 The People, etc., respondent, v Anthony Armstead, appellant. (Ind. No. 1646/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the counsel assigned to represent the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 2, 2002, to withdraw the brief previously filed and for leave to serve and file a new brief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and in relation thereto and upon the papers filed in opposition to the motion by the appellant pro se, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
H. MILLER, J.P., COZIER, CRANE and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24244
E/sl
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
BARRY A. COZIER
STEPHEN G. CRANE
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2003-10280 The People, etc., respondent, v Eric J. Bullis, appellant. (Ind. No. 03-00562)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by John R. Lewis, Esq., the attorney assigned to represent the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered November 17, 2003,to be relieved. By decision and order on motion of this court dated March 7, 2005, the appellant was directed to show cause why an order should or should not be entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that he has abandoned the appeal, and the motion by John R. Lewis, Esq., to be relieved was held in abeyance.
On the court's own motion, and no papers having been filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motion of John R. Lewis, and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion of John R. Lewis, is denied as academic.
H. MILLER, J.P., COZIER, CRANE and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24243
E/sl
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
BARRY A. COZIER
STEPHEN G. CRANE
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2003-10886 The People, etc., respondent, v Chrisner Desulma, appellant. (Ind. No. 5579/88)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the counsel assigned to represent the appellant on an appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 21, 2003, to amend the notice of assignment of counsel to include the judgment rendered May 22, 1989.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
H. MILLER, J.P., COZIER, CRANE and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M24238
PL/sl
|
2003-08175
The People, etc., respondent, v Jermel Hardy, appellant. (Ind. No. 3482/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 3, 2002.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's brief which was submitted to the Clerk of this court on April 18, 2005, is accepted for filing.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court