Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11759
CF/
|
2003-10679 Tevone Allen, et al., appellants, v All Aboard Day Care, Inc., et al., respondents. (Index No. 16761/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 30, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11775
S/nal
|
2003-10446
Allstate Insurance Company, et al., respondents, v United International Insurance Company, appellant.
(Index No. 23990/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 16, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before June 11, 2004.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11728
Y/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
BARRY A. COZIER
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-00060 Lovet Bailey, respondent, v Montefiore Medical Center, appellant. (Index No. 44608/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to stay the trial of the above-entitled action pending the hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 19, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial of the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before June 29, 2004; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before June 29, 2004, the court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11746
S/nal
|
2003-10977
Pamela M. Bickford, appellant, v St. Francis Hospital, et al., respondents. (Index No. 3993/99)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 20, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until September 1, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11753
CF/
|
2003-09021 Mario Calle, respondent, v Roger Stein, et al., appellants. (Index No. 12162/01
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants Carol Blum, a/k/a Carol K. Blum, a/k/a Carol Kohlreiter Blum, a/k/a Carol Kohlreiter, and Charles Haggett, to withdraw their appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 18, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by Carol Blum, a/k/a Carol K. Blum, a/k/a Carol Kohlreiter Blum, a/k/a Carol Kohlreiter, and Charles Haggett, is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11738
S/nal
|
2003-11400
Ray Cortez, respondent, v Country-Wide Insurance Company, appellant. (Index No. 40851/91)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 29, 2002.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until August 2, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11654
S/nal
|
2003-00727
Felicitia Cruz, plaintiff-respondent, v Green Bus Lines, Inc., et al., defendants, Brooklyn Union Gas, appellant, Nazmvil Rohoman, defendant-respondent. (Action No. 1) (Index No. 17427/96) 2003-00729 Barbara Goddard, plaintiff-respondent, v City of New York, et al., defendants, Brooklyn Union Gas, appellant, Nazmvil Rohoman, defendant-respondent. (Action No. 2) (Index No. 10099/98)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent, Nazmvil Rohoman, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file briefs on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 30, 2001, entered in Action No. 1, and March 22, 2001, entered in Action No. 2.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the movant's time to serve and file her respective briefs is enlarged until July 26, 2004, and the movants' briefs must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11710
A/sl
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
SANDRA L. TOWNES
STEPHEN G. CRANE
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.
|
2004-02098
Oscar Escobar, plaintiff, v St. Vincent's Medical Center of Richmond, defendant. (Index No. 625/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Appellate Division |
Motion by the defendant for leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated December 17, 2003, which modified an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County, dated June 20, 2002.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
SANTUCCI, J.P., TOWNES, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11762
L/
NANCY E. SMITH, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
THOMAS A, ADAMS
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2003-07082
Emily Gonzalez, et al., respondents, v Luanas Limo, Inc., et al., appellants. (Index No. 30213/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 27, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
SMITH, J.P., S. MILLER, ADAMS, RIVERA and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11767
PL/nal
|
2003-09147
Jeffrey Hughes, et al., appellants, v Bi Feng Nie,et al., respondents. (Index No. 35348/99)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent General Motors Acceptance Corp. pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 5, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the movant's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 18, 2004, and the movant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11794
PL/sl
|
2003-10447
M.S. Hi-Tech, Inc., respondent, v Donald J. Thompson, Jr., appellant. (Index No. 8428/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 20, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until August 18, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11719
A/sl
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
SANDRA L. TOWNES
STEPHEN G. CRANE
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.
|
2004-02275
Tina Pappas Marousis, plaintiff, v Anthony Stamos, defendant. (Index No. SC 8215/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Appellate Division |
Motion by the defendant pro se, inter alia, for leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated December 2, 2003, which affirmed a judgment of the City Court of the City of Yonkers, Westchester County, entered October 4, 2002.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
SANTUCCI, J.P., TOWNES, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11761
CF/
|
2003-09991 Suzanne Mitsos, respondent, v Theodore Mitsos, appellant. (Index No. 3708/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 23, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11699
E/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
BARRY A. COZIER
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-04298 Yaakov Moskowitz, et al., plaintiffs, v Jeno Frieder, et al., defendants. (Index No. 10399/04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the defendants, inter alia, for leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 10, 2004, and to vacate a temporary restraining order contained in an order to show cause of the same court dated April 1, 2004, and continued by the order dated May 10, 2004, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied as academic.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11748
O/sl
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
NANCY E. SMITH
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.
|
2002-08475 Robyn Murphy, respondent, v Kenneth Murphy, appellant. (Index No. 28216/96)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant for leave to reargue an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 16, 2002, which was determined by decision and order of this court dated February 17, 2004, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this court.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, with $100 costs.
SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11752
CF/
|
2003-11393 Poltime Interiors, Inc., et al., respondents- appellants, v Utica First Insurance Company, et al., respondents, Howard Seed, appellant- respondent. (Index Nos. 6938/00, 123585/99, 123808/90)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant-respondent to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 10, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11776
PL/nal
|
2003-07887
John Puglisi, appellant, v Una Puglisi, respondent. (Index No. 19930/98)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 5, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 9, 2004, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11772
PL/nal
|
2003-08640
Argyro Scammacca, respondent, v Paul Scammacca, appellant. (Index No. 5057/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 29, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until June 21, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11796
Pl/sl
|
2003-04094
Sidney B. Browne & Son, LLP, appellant, v Parr Development Corp., et al., respondents. (Index No. 18735/99)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 9, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondents' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until June 25, 2004, and the respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11749
R/nal
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
BARRY A. COZIER
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-01000
Barry Steinberg, et al., respondents, v Judy Linzer, appellant. (Index No. 27860/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action, including enforcement of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered February 2, 2004, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 18, 2003, and cross motion by the respondents to dismiss the appeal from the order, on the ground that the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with entry of the judgment.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and cross motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the cross motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11779
PL/sl
|
2003-10577
Arik Tal, etc., appellant, v Superior Vending, LLC, et al., respondents. (Index No. 3510/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 15, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until July 15, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11708
E/sl
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-03299 Kenneth Taylor, et al., respondents, v Dynaserv Industries, Inc., appellant, et al., defendants.
(Index No. 33117/99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 13, 2004, inter alia, to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
SANTUCCI, J.P., S. MILLER, SCHMIDT and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11676
M/nal
|
2004-00729
In the Matter of Pierre (Anonymous). Marlene S. (Anonymous), et al., appellants; Rockland County Attorney, respondent. (Docket No. AC-2906/03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Marlene S. and Emmanuel S. from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated December 22, 2003. The appellants' brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on May 17, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the respondent's brief shall be served and filed within 45 days of the date of this order.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11677
M/nal
|
2003-10481 In the Matter of Leslie Barnes, respondent, v Janette Mickelsen-Barnes, appellant. (Docket No. O-7954/03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Janette Mickelsen-Barnes from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated October 15, 2003. By decision and order of this court dated May 14, 2004, the appellant's motion for leave to prosecute the above-entitled appeal as a poor person was denied. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4), above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11747
S/nal
|
2003-05444
In the Matter of Gregory Chrysler, appellant, v Town of Newburgh Police Department, et al., respondents.
(Index No. 893/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated April 1, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before July 31, 2004.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11743
O/sl
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P.
SANDRA L. TOWNES
STEPHEN G. CRANE
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2004-03720 In the Matter of Coordinated Title Insurance Cases. Insurance Rate Service Association, Inc., nonparty- appellant; Joseph Piscioneri, et al., respondents. (Index No. 9600/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 15, 2004, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
KRAUSMAN, J.P., TOWNES, CRANE and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M10986
L/
|
In the Matter of the Dismissal of Causes for Failure to Perfect - Di May 2004 Calendar
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION smissal for Failure to timely Perfect |
The appellants or petitioners in the following named causes have failed to perfect their respective appeals or proceedings within the time limitations specified in subdivision (e) of sections 670.8 of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.8[e]). The titles of the matters appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants or petitioners failed to make applications to enlarge the time to perfect within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the following named causes are dismissed.
Docket No.Title
2000-10251Matter of Daughton v DeGroat
2001-00685Matter of P. (Anonymous), Erica
2001-08195Matter of Huerta v Green
2001-09289Matter of Scibilia, deceased; Luchetti
2002-06662Hatcher v Town of Islip
2002-10302Matter of Tagliaferri, d/b/a Castle Hill Homes v Weiler
2002-10346Ayoub v Wesley
2002-10452Ferdinand v Crecca & Blair
2003-02302Matter of Kilano v Pulsoni
2003-02948Matter of Samuel v Dillon
2003-03082People ex rel. Best, o/b/o Best v Driscoll
2003-03275Acito v Acito
2003-03404Matter of Newman v Castellon
2003-03599DiFranco v City of New York
2003-03649Shechet v Shechet
2003-03746Matter of Anekwe v Thacker
2003-03804Scazzuso v Ozdemir
2003-03836Marino v Town of Oyster Bay
2003-03876Matter of President Ventures, LLC v Hewitt; Hewitt v Piccione
2003-03953Matter of Zweroff v Koch
2003-04019Matter of Diggs v Diggs
2003-04189Cohen v Lapidus
2003-04367Rothchild v L.F. Auto Corp.
2003-04410Stevenson v State of New York
2003-04443Matter of Buy Buy Baby, Inc. V L. Simon Corporation
2003-04521Matter of Deutsch v Stern
2003-04708DiFuria v Ronstein Construction Corp.
2003-04709Hope v Select Motors, Inc. D/b/a Auto Plaza Center
2003-04803Evans v Chisolm
2003-04858Bank One v Cummaro
2003-04884Ledwith v Raviv
2003-05225Katz v Roberts
2003-05272People ex rel. Feliz v Davis
2003-05279Matter of Murphy v New York State Board of Parole
2003-05360Buendia v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
2003-05476Matter of Handwerker v Board of Education of the City of New York
2003-05535Lorincz v Silberman
2003-05554Matter of Jones v New York City Transit Authority
2003-05574Gross v Gross
2003-05650Matter of Alvear v Travis
2003-05702Abrams v Lam Asset Management Inc.
2003-05703Talk of the Town Realty Corp. V Sobolinsky
2003-05812Okerblom v Okerblom
2003-05836Beizem v Zozzaro
2003-05864Belkin v Brightwater Towers Condo Homeowner's Association, Inc.
2003-05868Ortiz v Kim Tong Hwan
2003-05901Charles v Charles
2003-05912Fellinger v Ramroop
2003-05916Semonella v Wells
2003-05935Messinger v Kornahrens
2003-05938Foster v The Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc.
2003-05939Rupp-Elmasri v Elmasri
2003-05940Matter of Ujueta v Albrycht
2003-05943Martinez v Kerr
2003-05944Martinez v Kerr
2003-05964Bruno v Hildreth
2003-06007Derenoncourt v Derenoncourt
2003-06012Creekmore v Franklin General Hospital
2003-06014Sparaco v North Shore University Hospital
2003-06020Matter of Levine v Town of Clarkstown Zoning Board of Appeals
2003-06026Goodman v Jefferson Realty Holdings, LLC
2003-06029Naughton v Burns
2003-06055Shelley v Silvestre
2003-06076Matter of Fisher v Robinson
2003-06080Kearns v Kearns
2003-06082Tiflinsky v Moskowitz
2003-06143Cheng a/k/a Chuu v Young
2003-06155Glaser v City of New York
2003-06162Connecticut Indemnity Company v Problem Solved Pest Control, Inc.
2003-06164Lancer Insurance Company v Familia
2003-06186Guzzo-Crocamo v Vermeer Manufacturing Company
2003-06188Ramirez v Lu
2003-06196Alves v Kowlessar
2003-06200Matter of North River Insurance Company v Gonzalez
2003-06204Dunn v Bushlow
2003-06208Varsity Transit, Inc. V AIU Insurance Company
2003-06211Papa a/k/a Popescu v 24 Caryl Avenue Realty Co.
2003-06214Ramnarine v Bissoon
2003-06220Brandes v North Shore University Hospital
2003-06227Handal v Hart
2003-06232New York Mortgage Servicing Corp. V Young
2003-06235Robinson v Soutar
2003-06241Ryabyuk v Ryabyuk
2003-06245Rodriguez v Dewalt
2003-06248Torre v Genovese Drug Store
2003-06256Ford Motor Credit Company v Racwel Construction Inc.
2003-06265Margouleff v Pavia
2003-06268Matter of Bernstein v Nassau County Board of Elections
2003-06271Faust v Harrison Conference Center of Glen Cove, Inc.
2003-06270Lynn v Tooher
2003-06277Lotysz v New York Jets, LLC
2003-06280Meyer v Verizon, f/k/a Bell Atlantic, Nynex or New York Telephone
2003-06279Del Vecchio v Battinelli
2003-06285Matter of The Links at North Hills Homeowners Association, Inc. V Inco
2003-06287State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v Antoine
2003-06298Knapp v Village of Montgomery
2003-06309Thompson v State of New York
2003-06311Matter of Ibraheem v Board of Zoning Appeals Town of Brookhaven
2003-06312Matter of Utica National Assurance Company v Lofrisco
2003-06313Coppola v All-Type Trucking, Inc.
2003-06331Matter of Oliver v Kralik
2003-06347Ruth C. Rodgers & Associates, Inc. V Silber
2003-06349Konezny v Price
2003-06356G., an Infant v Camp
2003-06359Windsor Metal Fabrications, Ltd. V Schechtman
2003-06362Nationsbanc v Weintraub
2003-06363Raglin v Raglin
2003-06385D'Ambrosio v Montero, Finizio, Velasquez, Weissing & Reyes, P.A.
2003-06389Hopkins v Covey, Roberts, Buchanan & McGroddy, Attorney At law
2003-06399Urban Music Ventures, LLC v Radius Corp. A/k/a Radius Group
2003-06422Kayser v Kayser
2003-06427Candia v Kantor
2003-06430Taverna v Taverna
2003-06431Fitzgerald v Manufacturer's Hanover Trust Company
2003-06432Abayeva v Gold Star Limo, Corp.
2003-06438Matter of Ehmke, Edward; Edward J. Chesnik
2003-06439Matter of Turner, Jason; Herman Fisher; United Funding, Inc.
2003-06440Passas v Passas
2003-06441Severino v City of New York
2003-06444Manzi v Desantis
2003-06500Gambino v Gambino
2003-06503Truckers Bank Plan, A Division of 1st Source Bank v RIT Auto Leasing G
2003-06517Schneider v Schneider
2003-06523Matter of Jols Realty Corp. V New York State Division of Housing & Co
2003-06524Washington v New York City Housing Authority
2003-06533Shaikh v City of New York
2003-06534Tucker v New York City Housing Authority
2003-06535Werzberger v 16th Avenue and 45th Street Corporation
2003-06538Heras v P.S. 71 Associates, LLC
2003-06537Genzone v Rental car Finance Corporation
2003-06545Ortiz v Jaber
2003-06548Feliciano v Park Health Center
2003-06554Bermudez v City of New York
2003-06557Bonsu v Metropolitan Transit Authority
2003-06566Stover v New York City Transit Authority
2003-06573Matthews v The Cornwall Hospital
2003-06574Basin Realty, LLC v Cracchiolo
2003-06579Ayarza v 1552-1575-1581 President Street Realty Corp., a/k/a 1552-75-8
2003-06597Zhirnov v Gorenshteyn
2003-06598Matter of DeSimone v Dean Enterprises
2003-06609Entenmann v Fahey
2003-06611Entenmann v Fahey
2003-06614Mtr of American Protection Insurance Company v Valinoti
2003-06625Preitz v Preitz
2003-06629Matter of Klein v Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Scarsdale
2003-06633Staab v Staab
2003-06651People ex rel. Hager o/b/o Hager v Kenny
2003-06674Ramirez v Beck
2003-06678Spencer Realty, Inc.
2003-06681Petrie v Bridgehampton Road Races Corporation
2003-06695Flores v Mirsky
2003-06700Gomez v Suhrland
2003-06706County of Nassau v Courbois
2003-06708County of Nassau v Rodriguez
2003-06717Yakub v Trustees of Northport-East Northport Public Library
2003-06723Kaplan v Reichel
2003-06724St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, a/a/o Penafiel v General Motors Accepta
2003-06730Matter of Estate of Fotiades, Deceased; Moskoff
2003-06737LaRuffa v Lau
2003-06739Chapon v Green
2003-06746Capparelli v Campbell
2003-06762Fuller v New York City Housing Authority
2003-06765Iqbal v Khader
2003-06773Ramirez v Arco Management Corporation
2003-06784Chiarenza v Lana Gourmet Foods, Ltd.
2003-06788Matter of K.W.F. Realty, Corp. V Kaufman
2003-06791Matter of Philbert v Goord
2003-06794Cepeda v Backyard Grill, Inc.
2003-06795Mussenden v State of New York
2003-06799Resources Trust f/b/o Goldberg v Edge Money Management, LLC
2003-06802Legerme v Rhadaswarny, Inc.
2003-06805Gambella v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
2003-06813People ex rel. Feliz v Davis
2003-06819Vieira v Sansotta
2003-06821Island Properties & Equities, LLC v Gordon
2003-06822Carlin v Latty
2003-06826Dos Reis v Stuart Cohen, LLC
2003-06829State Farm Insurance Company, a/s/o Sidel v Robison Oil Co.
2003-06833Bank of New York v Headlam
2003-06834State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v Fleisher
2003-06841Blue Ridge Insurance Company v Barrow
2003-06846Ayala v Wood
2003-06847Nowaski v City of New York
2003-06849Matter of Bordat v Nationwide Insurance Company
2003-06852Carrozza v Gorousingh
2003-06857Matter of Furlani, an Incapacitated Person
2003-06863Abou-Saab v Ri Su
2003-06864Conigliaro v Leben Home For Adults
2003-06873Moynagh v Chung
2003-06879Moore v Chartelain
2003-06881Cobos v Phieffer
2003-06887Zampino v Musso Properties, LLC
2003-06892Wang, a/k/a Ooi v Rubenstein
2003-06895Von Werne v Von Werne
2003-06910Sliva v Incorporated Village of East Rockaway
2003-06915New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal v Gugliotti Associates, Inc.
2003-06920Swanson v Eichler
2003-06921Quirk v Zuckerman
2003-06923JP Morgan Chase Bank v Just One Call Restaurant Management Services, I
2003-06925County of Nassau v Nicoll
2003-06926County of Nassau v Lutz
2003-06934Salmon Brothers Realty Corp. V Glenn
2003-06935Roslyn Savings Bank v Napolitano
2003-06936Matter of Sayage v Harlem
2003-06939Arnoff v Sound Design Homes, Inc.
2003-06940Daves v County of Suffolk
2003-06946Rosen v Rosen
2003-06948Dychkowski v County of Suffolk
2003-06963Marzano v Marzano
2003-06964Taft v Allen
2003-06971Matter of Hammonds v Mazzuca
2003-06997Alarcon v Campuzano
2003-06998Sovereign Bank v Suburban Community Realty Corporation
2003-07008M&T Mortgage Corporation v St. Stephen's Baptist Church, Inc.
2003-07016Matter of Molina v Prendergass
2003-07029Rodriguez v Joseph
2003-07028Tomor v 1733 Development Corporation
2003-07030Smith v Hertz Corporation
2003-07035Petrosino v Vasquez
2003-07038Peters v Gagliado
2003-07039Bronakowski v Chatham Towers, Inc.
2003-07057Barbieri v Barbieri
2003-07058Barbieri v Barbieri
2003-07065NYCTL 1991-1 Trust v Brown
2003-07071Mazurkiewicz v Duggan
2003-07073Cruz v Azad
2003-07076Mendoza v Sideris
2003-07079Whitley v Ford Motor Credit, Company Inc.
2003-07081Petrozza v VRH Construction Company, Inc.
2003-07089Carrano v Village of Lindenhurst
2003-07091Zaino v Atlantis Marine World
2003-07100Matter of Miranda, Deceased; Garcia
2003-07104Pedrotti v Ettinger
2003-07106Allevato v Deer Park Union Free School District #7
2003-07110Belziti v Villa Roma Resort & Conference Center
2003-07113Nortman v Nortman
2003-07117Flynn v Flynn
2003-07116Caivano v Caivano
2003-07118County of Nassau v Erickson
2003-07119Blandon v Legra
2003-07121Augustin v Fagan
2003-07123Paladini v Nugnes
2003-07122Napolitano-Rosenbloom v Vandoff
2003-07125Rowe v Brower
2003-07126Rowe v Brower
2003-07127Rowe v Brower
2003-07130North Fork Bank v Aladdin Transportation, Inc.
2003-07159Elias v Bash
2003-07163Fitzpatrick v Fitzpatrick
2003-07168Matter of Eagle Insurance Company v Joya
2003-07185White v Avis Rent A Car
2003-07190Friedman v Valerio
2003-07193Schaff v Letterelli
2003-07194Matter of Wausau Insurance Company v Banatt
2003-07198Piorkowski v Katz Parking System, Inc.
2003-07199Cordero v City of New York
2003-07200Matter of Chiumento v City of New York
2003-07206Connor v Nautilus Service Corporation
2003-07233Excalibur Restaurant & Tavern, Inc. V TLJ Poughkeepsie Motel Corp.
2003-07242Ryan v Ryan
2003-07248Imm v Lomedico
2003-07247Downey v City of New York
2003-07253Heyliger v State of New York
2003-07256North Fork Bank v Cantico International, LTD
2003-07261O'Neil v Dutchess County Agricultural Society, Inc.
2003-07266Bennett v South Shore Opthalmology, P.C.
2003-07268D'Alesio v State Farm Insuranc Companies
2003-07281Homeside Lending, Inc. V Brown
2003-07288Matter of Kabro of Massapequa, LLC v County of Nassau
2003-07300Matter of Boone; Allen, An Incapacitated Person
2003-07303DeRose v New York City Board of Education
2003-07304Ayers v Ayers
2003-07306Pulaski v Pulaski
2003-07305Reuter v Savocchi
2003-07309Qureshi v Route 25A Southold Realty, Corp.
2003-07311Coppola v Chetkof
2003-07312Sanderson v Reiner
2003-07317Frydman v Frydman
2003-07319Fried v Carlucci & Legum
2003-07320Hao v Tomilu, Corp.
2003-07325Mann v GFG Cleaning Contractors, Inc.
2003-07326Trautenberg v Gibney Leasing Corporation
2003-07327Vasilakos v Svoboda
2003-07333Matter of Estate of DiResta; Guardino
2003-07336Cullinana v Call
2003-07340Crescio v Incorporated Village of Sag Harbor
2003-07343Sant Ambroeus Gelato, LLC, f/k/a Sant Ambroeus Gelato v La Cremeria, L
2003-07358Kirshon v Kirshon
2003-07361DePalma v Hacker Oil Corporation
2003-07368St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center, a/a/o Acevedo v Liberty Mutua
2003-07369Doe v State of New York
2003-07386St. Fort v New York City Transit Authority
2003-07388Long v Gap, Inc.
2003-07408Melnik v Landau
2003-07410Brennan v Holubis
2003-07412Apostle v Town of Yorktown
2003-07422Pellett v Mauro
2003-07423Pellett v Mauro
2003-07424Pellett v Mauro
2003-07425Pellett v Mauro
2003-07429Mahopac Opthalmology, P.C. v Tarasevich
2003-07430Primerica Life Insurance Company v Roemer, f/k/a Leff, f/k/a Valente
2003-07445Colavito v City of New York
2003-07449Irving v Itwaru
2003-07455Smith-Cairns Motor Sales Company, Inc. V 10 Paxton Partners, L.P.
2003-07456Cit Communications Finance Corporation, f/k/a Newcourt Communications
2003-07457Cleary v Hollowbrook Holding Corporation
2003-07462German v Oleinik
2003-07479Matter of Merchants Insurance Group v McCann
2003-07485Berlin v Wojnarowski
2003-07487Kornblum v Kornblum
2003-07492Matter of Casatelli v Sullivan
2003-07493Matter of Casatelli v Sullivan
2003-07494Matter of Casatelli v Sullivan
2003-07513Hall v Irish
2003-07522Faraone v Ramos
2003-07523Juseinoski v Board of Education of the City of New York
2003-07526Molohides v Kouvaras
2003-07527Brandes v North Shore University Hospital
2003-07530Kew Gardens Hills Apartment Owners, Inc. V Horing Welikson & Rosen, P.
2003-07531Chando v Chando
2003-07532Wilhelm Group v White Plains Flooring & Supplies, Inc.
2003-07533Guinnarad v ANJ Holding, LLC
2003-07534Iskhakova v Wasser
2003-07541Duarte v Romano
2003-07542Duarte v Romano
2003-07544Matter of D., Yvonne; D., Lucky Angel (Anon); Public Admin., Suffolk
2003-07546Matter of D., Lucky Angel (Anon); Public Administrator, Suffolk
2003-07551Matter of Munno v Town of Orangetown
2003-07552Matter of Ward v Thacker
2003-07561Matter of Stern v Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Greenburgh
2003-07566Prozeller v Sunguroff
2003-07569Prozeller v Sunguroff
2003-07572Dropauer v Dropauer
2003-07574Aviation Constructors, Inc. V Baldassano Architectural Group, P.C.
2003-07582County of Nassau v Lienhard
2003-07586Debin v Cattano
2003-07588Canales v Werner
2003-07589Hausknecht v Comprehensive Medical Care of New York, P.C.
2003-07590Schwartz v Schwartz
2003-07592Herbil Holding Company v Lowenhar
2003-07597Fuller v Plan
2003-07611Daley v Bedford Flushing Holding Corporation
2003-07616Marquis v Eisenstein
2003-07627Gottesman v Korn
2003-07628Parzych v 109 Suffolk Corporation
2003-07629Parzych v 109 Suffolk Corporation
2003-07637Matter of Alert Coach Lines, Inc. V Serio
2003-07639Citibank, N.A. v Werczberger
2003-07640Shelvin Plaza Associates v Mondello
2003-07649Matter of DeBlasio v Uti, United States, Inc.
2003-07653Sciarretta v Multi-Specialty Medical, P.C.
2003-07654Matter of Estate of Cavallo, Deceased; Nalitt; Carroll
2003-07655Pistilli v Gandin
2003-07656Ruiz v Cacatian
2003-07662Coward v Martialto
2003-07663Ostashko v Ostashko
2003-07664Wright v Elmwood Park Condo, II
2003-07665Edwards-Pitt v Doe d/b/a Longstaff Paving & Excavating
2003-07670Iacono v Dharma Management Corporation
2003-07676Spallina v Spallina
2003-07677Jastremski v Jastremski
2003-07679Scazzuso v Ward
2003-07678Pellicano v Staten Island University Hospital
2003-07680Billingsley v Green Bus Lines, Inc.
2003-07682Douidi v Wendy's International, Inc.
2003-07691O'Connor v Dashron Realty Corp.
2003-07693Griffith v Schiavone Construction Company
2003-07694Adamson v Katz
2003-07709Norwest Mortgage of New York, Inc. V Israel
2003-07712Marro v TPK Construction Corp.
2003-07714Calvi v 79th Street Tenants Corporation
2003-07715Johnson v Applewhite
2003-07716Calvi v 79th Street Tenants Corporation
2003-07717Hernandez v Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
2003-07720Dorsi Construction, Inc. V Utica First Insurance Company
2003-07733Matter of Reiter v Reiter
2003-07734Papvlasopoulos v Chowdury
2003-07732Thornton v Lively
2003-07736Zimmer v Sung Shik Choi
2003-07737Manning v Djodjo's Taxi, Inc.
2003-07738Prestandrea v Stein
2003-07740Matter of Davis v Superintendent of Downstate Correctional Facility
2003-07752Siegel v Davidson Brothers, Inc.
2003-07755Edelheit v Grella
2003-07757Poucher v Inter County Appliance Corporation
2003-07764Carbe v Cary
2003-07766Ortiz v Greene
2003-07771Matter of Rozen, Marek; Joseph Kronik
2003-07772Matter of Eagle Insurance Company v many
2003-07775Varthis v Simonetti
2003-07785Abdale v Nadler
2003-07799United Real Estate Management & Consulting Company, Inc. V Oruchinsky
2003-07801Clarke v Martinez
2003-07805Ka v New York City Transit Authority
2003-07806Bolden v New York City Transit Authority
2003-07813Matter of Pender v New York State Disciplinary Administration
2003-07812Cochran v City of New York
2003-07817Quinones v City of New York
2003-07820Chandler v Mack
2003-07842Stojowski v D'Sa
2003-07852Iderman v K Mart Corporation
2003-07853Dillon v Planet Dublin
2003-07858Degroff v Comsewogue School District
2003-07859Matter of Itzkowitz v Lawrence
2003-07864Martinez v State of New York
2003-07871Greenstein v Greenstein
2003-07872South Liberty Realty Corp. V Mercury
2003-07883Matter of Concerned Citizens For Open Space, Inc. V City of White Plai
2003-07890Rosengard v Rosengard
2003-07913Butcher v Butcher
2003-07914Fajardo v Cobb
2003-07921Siddique v NYRAC, d/b/a Budget Rent-A-Car
2003-07925Cuozzo v Lagenbach
2003-07926Rakhnayev v Abramov
2003-07931Gubin v Kinney
2003-07933Persaud v Persaud
2003-07935Jawed v Shir
2003-07941People ex rel. Thigpen v Phillips
2003-07961Seus v Hope Realty, Inc.
2003-07962Matter of Turitto v O'Donnell
2003-07964Campanaro v Campanaro
2003-07967Miah v Miah
2003-07973Garcia v Cruz
2003-07975Montecalvo v Laro Maintenance Corporation
2003-07978Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company of Omaha v All Mine Carting
2003-07980Doria v Doria
2003-07981Franzese v Andrew Jergens Company
2003-07982Matter of Easton Home Building Corporation v Scheyer
2003-07983Matter of Easton Home Building Corporation v Scheyer
2003-07996Vukich v Sutaria
2003-07999Lancer Insurance Company v Boh
2003-08001Drivakos v Tower
2003-08004Shurka v Simaee
2003-08005Taylor v Incorporated Village of Hempstead
2003-08008Karol v Beeber
2003-08009Lizza v Aanitron Systems, Inc.
2003-08014Kern, Augustine, Conroy & Schoppmann, P.C. v Levene
2003-080161444 Richmond Realty Corp., d/b/a Vitale Sunshine Realty v Four Bri
2003-08018Gervasi v Gervasi
2003-08048Wilson v Hallen Construction Corporation
2003-08050Cooper v L.L.C. Holding a/k/a Linden Holding
2003-08053Ruiz v Hart Elm Corporation
2003-08056Vergel v Lifschutz
2003-08059Bidalis v Haiboub
2003-08063Murafa v Three Good Fellows, Inc. D/b/a Exit
2003-08065Matthew v City of New York
2003-08068Ruderman v City of new York
2003-08075Tiburcio v City of New York
2003-08094Matter of D'Agostino Brothers Enterprises, Inc. V Vecchio
2003-08095Lassen v Keltner
2003-08096Matter of Carvel, Pamela; Estate of Agnes Carvel
2003-08107Profaci v Malek
2003-08109Bengston v Bloomingdale Ridge Associates
2003-08112Lindgren v St. Vincent's Medical Center of Richmond
2003-08123Petty v State of New York
2003-08124Matter of Byrd v Greiner
2003-08140Zeis v Harelick
2003-08141Matter of Doe v Selsky
2003-08155Hoffman v Unterberg
2003-08156Bass v City of New York
2003-08165Samaras v Empire Associates Realty Company
2003-08168Matter of Guzman, An Incapacitated Person
2003-08183Urgiles v Santa Fe Construction, Inc.
2003-08186Zucker v Montgomery Development Corp.
2003-08194Family Cycle Corp. V Kalderon
2003-08203Edwards v B.J. Ora of New York
2003-08213Condrill v Condrill
2003-08219Harrigan v Price
2003-08231Calica v Reisman
2003-08232DeStefano v Kjartansson
2003-08238Mastrangioli v Etienne
2003-08241Millington v Jones
2003-08243Vasca Siding, Inc. V Utica First National Insurance Company
2003-08245Ruehman v Curran
2003-0824718 Heyward Realty Corp. V Lego, Inc.
2003-08250Levinson v Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of New York
2003-08255DeNiro v Fox Hollow Restaurants & Caterers
2003-08265Matter of Reiter v Reiter
2003-08267Bank of New York v Mobile Data Shred, Inc.
2003-08271Squadron Partners, LLC v Citibank, N.A.
2003-08278Matter of Alvear v Phillips
2003-08284LLP Mortgage Ltd, f/k/a Loan Participant v Capitol Bakery
2003-08287Garal Wholesalers, Ltd. V Miller Brewing Company
2003-08290Power Connector, Inc. V Yang, d/b/a L Technology
2003-08299Drizin v Schwartz
2003-08301Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
2003-08309Hunt v Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.
2003-08311Matter of Webster, Melissa; Marion W. Webster
2003-08318Kujan v White Post Farms, Inc.
2003-08320Matter of Lever, Deceased; Lever; Belsky
2003-08346Matter of Acero v McGinnis mA
2003-08365Kirby v Car Temp Financing, L.P.
2003-08373Tinizhanay v Winfat Realty, Inc.
2003-08378Jennie Realty LLC v TSO General Corporation
2003-08381Jennie Realty LLC v TSO General Corporation
2003-08400Matter of Town of Islip v Hope for Youth, Inc.
2003-08403Galeano v New York City Transit Authority
2003-08407Tarone v Energywise, Inc.
2003-08427Albicocco v Port Dock & Stone Corp.
2003-08425Davis v Hann Financial Services, Inc.
2003-08429Garal Wholesalers, Ltd. V Miller Brewing Company
2003-08432Near v The wagner Pool Company
2003-08433Goran Contracting, Inc. V State of New York
2003-08444Salah v Fox
2003-08454Shteingart v All Ride Transportation, Inc
2003-08462Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. V Scarlett
2003-08463Matter of F. (Anonymous) v Finn
2003-08464Matter of F., Emanuel; Valley Ridge Center of Intensive Treatment
2003-08466Citibank, N.A. v Stefansky
2003-08468Richards v City of New York
2003-08482Lahey v New York State Thruway Authority
2003-08498Anastasio Landscaping, Inc. V Silver Huntington Enterprises, L.L.C, a/
2003-08504Vittor v Vittor
2003-08513Gonzalez v Yoni Realty, LLC
2003-08517Damico v Costco Wholesale Corporation
2003-08521Rakhmanov v Chan
2003-08523Kaufman v Dexel Taxi Corporation
2003-08524Zuniga v Silva
2003-08534Queens Boulevard Extended Care Facility, Inc. V Whalen
2003-08537Gethers v Goode
2003-08539Post v Post
2003-08540Broussard v Dairy Conveyor Corporation
2003-08556Antolini v Antolini
2003-08558Dutchess Wheels, Inc. V Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc.
2003-08563Vornfett v Hunter
2003-08564Elliot v Jurman
2003-08568Bambino v Orthopedic & Sports Associates of Long Island, P.C.
2003-08569Kennedy v Kennedy
2003-08575Homeside Lending, Inc. V Robertson
2003-08579Henry v Henry
2003-08582Citifinancial Mortgage Company, Inc. F/k/a Associates Home Equity Serv
2003-08589Milocevich v Toboroff
2003-08591Lynch v Aspiration, Inc.
2003-08596Tomicich v Tomicich
2003-08600Kennedy v Kennedy
2003-08601Mighter, Inc. V Wey Technology Limited
2003-08604Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v Serio
2003-08609Matter of Conversions for Real Estate, LLC v Gavosto Associates, Inc.
2003-08612City of Long Beach v Trolf
2003-08621Bengard v Bengard
2003-08635Adrien v 1829 Caton Avenue Development Corporation
2003-08636Allstate Insurance Company v Campbell
2003-08639Oringer v Dick
2003-08647Eveready Hardware Mfg. Inc. V Steir
2003-08649Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v Yelcich
2003-08654Baylis v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
2003-08656Petit-Frere v New York City Transit Authority
2003-08658Paraskevas v Frank
2003-08660Mastromonico v Mastromonico
2003-08661Lombardi v Murphy
2003-08670Jurbala v Muench
2003-08695Nunez v City of New York
2003-08697Vargas v Conway Stores, Inc.
2003-08699McGelligott v Forest Hills Senior Housing, LLC
2003-08701Holmes v Triangle Equities Corp.
2003-08702Graziano v Carone
2003-08705Holmes v Triangle Equities Corp.
2003-08706Sukhram v Covington
2003-08707Sanchez v Denardo
2003-08709Forest Hills Continental Photography, Inc. V Nelson
2003-08712Questo v Buckley
2003-08714Gavaghan v Forman
2003-08719Young v Estes El
2003-08727Matter of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v Conover
2003-08732Khan v Kaplan
2003-08743Clerkin v Clerkin
2003-08746Silkwood v Butler
2003-08750Tewfick v Epstein
2003-08751Benet v Benet
2003-08756Matter of Avgush v Town of Yorktown
2003-08757Zimmer v Sung Shik Choi
2003-08759Guzzo-Crocamo v Vermeer Manufacturing Company
2003-08764Levitsky v Sound Shore Medical Center of Westchester
2003-08767Flower, a/k/a Gasparini v Flower
2003-08781Pirro v Carroll
2003-08782Collier v Adoracion Elevado
2003-08785John John, LLC v LaValle
2003-08787John John, LLC v LaValle
2003-08791Palermiti v Taylor
2003-08798Pollatos-Karanasos v Boulasskis
2003-08808Field v Schultz
2003-08814Matter of Empire Insurance Company v Collins
2003-08817Montesano v State of New York
2003-08818Montesano v State of New York
2003-08820Miller v Grand Council of the Independent United Order of Mechanics Fr
2003-08821Thomas v State of New York
2003-08825Matter of Estate of DiResta; Guardino
2003-08834Tig Specialty Insurance v Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois
2003-08838Town of Hempstead v Katina, Inc.
2003-08845Calandra v Calandra
2003-08852Zelinger v Tadmor Foods, Inc., d/b/a Best Cookies & Bakery Supplies
2003-08854Napoli, Kaiser, Bern & Associates, LLP v Semler
2003-08860Balotti v Westchester County Health Care Corporation
2003-08861Matter of Tax Foreclosure Action No. 45; Alleyne, Maria
2003-08870Conticelli v Conticelli
2003-08872Rodriguez v Rice
2003-08873Seddio v City of New York
2003-08874Giglio v Giglio
2003-08876Rajdip Stationary Corporation v New Raja Food, Inc.
2003-08881Tischler v J.P. Morgan Chase, f/k/a Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
2003-08883Miklosz v Saxony Realty Associates, LLC
2003-08894Antolini v Antolini
2003-08901Matter of Underwood v Goord
2003-08902Graham v 433 Clinton Avenue
2003-08905Johnson v White
2003-08904Estate of Ungar v Matarazzo Blumberg & Associates, P.C.
2003-08906Johnson v White
2003-08907Johnson v White
2003-08909Zavelin v Greenberg
2003-08913Grogan v Grogan
2003-08916Masullo v KMP Realty, LTD.
2003-08937Werzberger v New York Professional Drywall, Corp.
2003-08944Matter of Clark v Town of Lewisboro
2003-08964Paraskevas v Frank
2003-08972Winokur v Winokur
2003-08975Hartman v City of Rye, New York
2003-08976Domino v Domino
2003-08979Mace v Berk
2003-08983Balbuena v DAP Properties, Inc.
2003-08984Matter of Nationwide Insurance Company v Belmonte
2003-08985Matter of Travelers Property Casualty Corporation v Castellano
2003-09017Vergara v D&T Construction Corporation
2003-09019Brown v Brown
2003-09020Mathisson v City of New York
2003-09028Sears Mortgage Corporation v Yaghobi
2003-09039Johnson v Buxton-Sinclair
2003-09045Banegas v Morico
2003-09055Boltja v Boltja
2003-09056D'Augustine v Sons of Italy in America, Inc.
2003-09059Matter of Terowsky; L&G Merchandising Company, Inc.
2003-09063Nugent v Nugent
2003-09072Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. V Ernst & Young, LLP
2003-09089Taylor v Filiou
2003-09100Farina v Handler
2003-09104Williams v Ruppert Towers Housing Co., Inc.
2003-09105Sepyashvilli v City of New York
2003-09108Matter of New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company v Abramova
2003-09110Herzog v Beth Chana Institution
2003-09114Ricatti v LaGuardia
2003-09113Ballard v Santiago
2003-09116Simpson v Barton & Zasky
2003-09121DeCilia v New York City Department of Sanitation
2003-09123Urban v City of New York
2003-09125Eliali v Aztec Metal Maintenance Corp.
2003-09129Brown v 99 Sutton, LLC
2003-09133Vasquez v Jin
2003-09137Aimetti v Sottile
2003-09143Garcia v Bay Ridge Automobiles Ltd.
2003-09152Grossman v Team Care Home Care Agency, Inc.
2003-09156Washington Mutual Bank, FSA v Alston
2003-09157Hattley v State of New York
2003-09158Clemente v McCormick
2003-09163Leist v Goldstein
2003-09180Aronson v Monahan
2003-09182Josemoan v Sook
2003-09183Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company v Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim Kiryas R
2003-09192Consiglio v City of New York
2003-09194Hoffman v Hoffman
2003-09197Markovits v Mitrany
2003-09198Duane Reade v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
2003-09201White Plains Flooring & Supply Co., Inc. V Wilhelm Group
2003-09208Mancuso v Delfico
2003-09212DeGregorio v DeGregorio
2003-09213Norwest Bank Minnesota v Matheson
2003-09228Matter of Prudential Property and Casualty Ins. Co. V Lalomio
2003-09246Chase Manhattan Mortgage, Corp. V Ogunbekun
2003-09247Drucker v Queens-Long Island Medical Group
2003-09258Mucolldri v City of New York
2003-09260Shuja v Sommers
2003-09267Archibald v Olivieri
2003-09269Connella v Palombo
2003-09272Krol v Krol
2003-09274Krol v Krol
2003-09288Rich v Wulwick
2003-09303Norwest Mortgage, Inc. V Taylor
2003-09304Connor v Waldbaum, Inc.
2003-09308City of Poughkeepsie v Decision Technologies International, Inc.
2003-09313Court Order, Inc. V Hartford Fire Insurance Company
2003-09328Sterngass v Village of Pomona
2003-09330Giannikakis v Castelle
2003-09335Wenner v Wenner
2003-09336Matter of Hird, Diane C.; Elisabeth Hird; Walter J. Zawacki; Susan Mig
2003-09342Matter of Daniel Daly, Deceased; Mashomack Club Organizing Committee
2003-09372O'Connor v DeFuria
2003-09373Green v Green
2003-09374Sullivan v Somasca
2003-09378Bunsis v Bunsis
2003-09380Liotti v Peace
2003-09382Jamroc Café, Inc. V Incorporated Village of Hempstead
2003-09393Marino v Bayswater Realty & Capital, Corp.
2003-09394Gotham Plaza Associates, LLC v KFC of America, Inc.
2003-09395Masry v Staus
2003-09415Boone v Bender
2003-09418Slavin v Vernon Management Company
2003-09419Matter of Bernard Grossfiled Consulting Engineer v Imperial Owners, Co
2003-09420Matter of Bernard Grossfiled Consulting Engineer v Imperial Owners, Co
2003-09425Singletary v City of New York
2003-09430Board of Managers of Hillcroft Townhouse Condominium v Adams
2003-09440Gerelli Insurance Agency, Inc. V Gerelli
2003-09445Ardovini v Ardovini
2003-09446Buchanan Wall Coverings, Inc. V Panitz
2003-09460DeMay v Cheron
2003-09463McQuay v Ford Motor Credit Company
2003-09464Kushman v Kushman
2003-09467Matter of New York City Transit Authority v Brown
2003-09471Matter of New York City Transit Authority v Brown
2003-09505MacKey v Forest City Tilden Associates, L.P.
2003-09508Bridgeport Capital Services, Inc. V New York University Center
2003-09510Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation v Desrosiers
2003-09509Gitomer v Gitomer
2003-09517O'Neil v Dutchess County Agricultural Society
2003-09522Matter of Marlow, Toby; Judith Blumensohn
2003-09524Holtzman v Best Western Paramount Hotel
2003-09555Teller v Wolf
2003-09556Matter of New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v Portillo
2003-09560Elliot v Jurman
2003-09562Nowak, d/b/a Norwak Farms v Madura
2003-09569Zayas v State of New York
2003-09583Shrenkel v Mainella
2003-09586Kaminsky v Waldner
2003-09608Murray v Suffolk County Department of Social Services
2003-09624Franciotti v Plantains, Inc.
2003-09627Lieberman v Lieberman
2003-09630Martinez v Smith
2003-09638Abraham v Abraham
2003-09650Torres v Nycon Building Corporation
2003-09657Michele v Mainco Elevators Industries, Inc.
2003-09658Simcha Developers, LLC v Terrace Park, Inc.
2003-09662Salemi v Salemi
2003-09668Amaker v Spence
2003-09673Waln v Merrill Lynch
2003-09681Reed v Reed
2003-09690Abbott v City of New York
2003-09693Cloesmeyer v Hospital For Special Surgery
2003-09703Godfry v Abraham
2003-09706McCarthy v Commercial Union Insurance Company
2003-09708Sciabarra v IPC Commercial Properties, LLC
2003-09712Matter of Eagle Insurance Company v Fermin
2003-09716Fanning v Serota Wading River, LLC
2003-09723O'Neil v Dutchess County Agricultural Society, Inc.
2003-09727Matter of R., Jamie; Commissioner of Mental Health
2003-09730Matter of Tax Foreclosure Action No. 45; Thomson, Mariel; Gluck, Norma
2003-09731Matter of Tax Foreclosure Action No. 45; Thomson, Mariel; Gluck, Norma
2003-09736Iorio v Waldbaum, Inc.
2003-09753Murray v Midstate Management Corporation
2003-09756Singh v Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc.
2003-09755Columbian Mutual Life Insurance Co. V McCall's Bronxwood Funeral Home
2003-09757Walsh v Commack Union Free School District
2003-09768McCarthy v Monfort
2003-09770East Hills Metro, Inc. V J.M. Dennis Construction Corporation
2003-09774Matter of We're Assoc. Co. V Zoning Bd of Appeals of Town of Oyster Ba
2003-09778Matter of Jagr v Lagr
2003-09779Matter of Chill v Young Israel of North Woodmere-Laurelton
2003-09780Matter of Young Israel of North Woodmere-Laurelton
2003-09781Napolitano-Rosenbloom v Vandoff
2003-09800People ex rel. Springer v Griambruno
2003-09809Matter of Leonard I. Rosen; Karl, Terry J.; Rosen, Garry; Rosen, Adam
2003-09823Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v Portis
2003-09829Blejwas v Montesdeoca
2003-09884Matter of Giliotti v Schiff
2003-09887Colinders v Soberano-Colinders
2003-09888McDonald v Eisenberg
2003-09891Qureshi v New York City Department of Education
2003-09893Qureshi v New York City Department of Education
2003-09903Parent v Law Office of Peter Botti
2003-09904Matter of Organist; Desiderio, An Alleged Incapacitated Person
2003-09907Conklin v Town of Wallkill
2003-09910Matter of Gwynn v Mulligan
2003-09946James v Nolan
2003-09951Marshall v Marshall
2003-09970Long v Singh
2003-09999Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v Roseme
2003-10013Johannas Travel, Inc. V Hanvit America Bank
2003-10014Goglia v Queens College
2003-10035Alvarez v 772 Park Avenue Corporation
2003-10039Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v Smith
2003-10051Matter of Progressive Northern Ins. Company v Estate of Alfred Johnson
2003-10093Frasca v Frasca
2003-10123Steinhauser v Steinhauser
2003-10121Premier Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. V Alsol Enterprises, Ltd.
2003-10138Frias v Village of Port Chester
2003-10146Matter of St. Clare v New York State Department of Health
2003-10180Channon v North Shore Tower Apartments, Inc.
2003-10305Salazar v Kang
2003-10378Freedman v Senter
2003-10415Samanian v Subehawawdeh
2003-10419Matter of Lusia Realty, Corp. V New York State Division of Housing & C
2003-10423Torres v City of New York
2003-10436Lewis v City of New York
2003-1093196 Pierrepont, LLC v Mauro
2003-11330Matter of Stoves & Stone, Ltd. V Martinez
2003-06306Cassella v Real Property Investors, Inc.
2003-06832Brown v City of White Plains
2003-05431Egan v National Emergency Services, Inc.
2003-07706A&A Associates, Inc. V Davis & Warshow, Inc.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11745
O/sl
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
NANCY E. SMITH
STEPHEN G. CRANE
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2003-08066 In the Matter of Dominic Dupont, appellant, v Kings County District Attorney's Office, respondent. (Index No. 19065/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 14, 2003, to strike the respondent's brief on the ground that it contains matter dehors the record.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is held in abeyance, and is referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.
SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, CRANE and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11757
R/nal
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
BARRY A. COZIER
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2003-10752
In the Matter of Chester Flanders, appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, respondent. (Index No. 5688/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated October 29, 2003, to waive the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10(g) regarding certification of the record on appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the respondent's time to serve and file a respondent's brief is enlarged until June 21, 2004, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11733
M/nal
|
2003-11219 In the Matter of Donald J. (Anonymous), Jr. Bonnie A. (Anonymous), appellant; George E. (Anonymous), respondent. (Docket No. G-4162-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Bonnie A. from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated November 19, 2003. By decision and order on motion of this court dated May 19, 2004, the appellant's motion to dispense with printing and for assignment of counsel was granted, and the following named attorney was assigned to prosecute the appeal:
Neal D. Futerfas, Esq.
50 Main Street - Suite 1000
White Plains, New York 10606
(914) 682-2171
Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this court dated May 19, 2004, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11756
CF/
|
2003-10311 In the Matter of Lalta Kunjbehari, respondent, v Wyandanch Union Free School District, appellant. (Index No. 26164/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 20, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11673
M/nal
|
2004-01894 In the Matter of Stephen LoTurco, appellant, v Lynn Marie Kuhl, respondent. (Docket No. V-1949-03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Stephen LoTurco from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated January 21, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 18, 2004.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11680
M/nal
|
2004-00790 In the Matter of Pinches Ostreicher, appellant, v Florence Pollack, respondent. (Docket Nos. V-09791/01, V-0448/02)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Pinches Ostreicher from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated December 30, 2003. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until June 30, 2004.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11715
M/nal
|
2004-03468, 2004-03469, 2004-03470, 2004-03471 In the Matter of Suzanne Parenzan, respondent, v Eugene Parenzan, appellant. (Docket No. F-00330-99) In the Matter of Suzanne Parenzan, respondent, v Eugene Parenzan, appellant. (Index No. 7987/03)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeals by Eugene Parenzan from two orders of the Family Court, Rockland County, both dated July 10, 2003 and two judgments of the Supreme Court Rockland County, dated November 25, 2003, and November 26, 2003, respectively. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is
ORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court and Supreme Court, if any, and the appellant shall notify this court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,
ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this court one of the following:
(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes in the Family Court or the Supreme Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11732
E/sl
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
BARRY A. COZIER
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-03939
In the Matter of Benjamin Perez, respondent, v Grissel M. Sepulveda, appellant.
(Docket No. V-17007-01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 30, 2004, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11445
F/
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
NANCY E. SMITH
STEPHEN G. CRANE
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
|
2004-00829 In the Matter of Lina Catalina R. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Leonaldo R. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket Nos. B-2959-03, B-2960-03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motions by the counsel assigned to represent the appellant in a proceeding before the Family Court, Suffolk County, to be relieved, for the assignment of new counsel to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated January 22, 2004, and for leave to the appellant prosecute the appeal as a poor person.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from a decision of the same court dated January 12, 2004, is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from the order dated January 22, 2004 (see CPLR 5520[c]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motions are granted and the counsel assigned by the Family Court is relieved from representing the appellant on the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that said counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to the new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the Law Guardian, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant's counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the Law Guardian, if any, when counsel serves the appellant's brief upon those parties; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act § 1120 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Helene Burgess, Esq.
8 White Lane
Hampton Bays, New York 11946
(631) 806-9164
and it is further,
ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any scheduling order or orders issued pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, CRANE, and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11778
M/nal
|
2003-08127
In the Matter of Malcolm Johnathin S. (Anonymous). Lakeside Family and Children's Services, Inc., respondent; Larry J. (Anonymous), appellant. (Docket No. B-8218/99)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Larry J. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 18, 2003. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant's brief on the appeal is enlarged until May 28, 2004.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11675
M/nal
|
2004-02009 In the Matter of Nancy A. Sebastiani, respondent, v Sam T. Locatelli, appellant. (Docket No. F-16153/02)
| SCHEDULING ORDER |
Appeal by Sam T. Locatelli from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated February 9, 2004. The appellant's brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this court on May 17, 2004. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the Rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it is
ORDERED that the respondent's brief shall be served and filed within 45 days of the date of this order.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11750
O/sl
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.
|
2003-10965 In the Matter of Johnnie Z. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; Diane Z. (Anonymous), appellant; et al., respondents. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Samia Z. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; Diane Z. (Anonymous), appellant; et al., respondents. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-14439/96, 14440/96)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal by Diane Z. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 7, 2003. By order to show cause dated April 19, 2004, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated January 9, 2004, issued pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.4(a)(3).
Now, on the court's own motion, and the papers filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated January 9, 2004 (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]).
H. MILLER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M11661
F/
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.
|
2003-10072 The People, etc., plaintiff, v Maurice Brown, defendant. (Ind. No. 7469/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 18, 2003, which has been referred to me for determination.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
Associate Justice
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11735
O/sl
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P.
HOWARD MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2003-11258 The People, etc., respondent, v Miguel Pereyra, appellant. (Ind. No. 349/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a purported judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 10, 2003, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel. By order to show cause dated March 22, 2004, the defendant was directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be entered dismissing the appeal from the purported judgment on the ground that no appeal lies from the purported judgment, as the purported judgment is nothing more than a proceeding to cause a judgment of the same court rendered November 12, 1998, to be brought to execution, and the motion was held in abeyance in the interim.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in relation thereto, and no papers having been filed in response to the order to show cause, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed on the ground that no appeal lies from the purported judgment, which is nothing more than a proceeding to cause a judgment of the same court rendered November 12, 1998, to be brought to execution (see People v Crawford, 239 AD2d 514); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.
ALTMAN, J.P., H. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11662
F/
HOWARD MILLER, J.
|
2004-03279
The People, etc., plaintiff, v Mario Perez, defendant. (Ind. No. 1173/86)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 29, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied.
HOWARD MILLER
Associate Justice
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M11668
F/
STEPHEN G. CRANE, J.
|
2004-03226
The People, etc., plaintiff, v Jose Velez, defendant. (Ind. No. 2963/92)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 10, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied.
STEPHEN G. CRANE
Associate Justice