Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27196

A/sl

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.

2004-06079 Aames Capital Corporation, respondent, v John Davidsohn, etc., appellant, et al., defendants. (Index No. 6565/97)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant to enjoin the respondent from taking any action to evict the appellant from the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 12, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

H. MILLER, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27210

T/sl

2005-00255, 2005-00488 Juan R. Andino, et al., respondents, v Monroe Truck Leasing, Inc., et al., appellants. (Index No. 49693/00)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 8, 2004, and November 3, 2004, respectively.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until September 1, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27199

A/sl

BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.

DAVID S. RITTER

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.

2004-04073 Michael Esposito, appellant, v SPA Nightclub, et al., respondents. (Index No. 9039/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant, in effect, to recall and vacate a decision and order on motion of this court dated April 21, 2005, which dismissed an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 28, 2004, and to reinstate the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

COZIER, J.P., RITTER, KRAUSMAN and SKELOS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27214

T/sl

2004-09242 William S. Federkiel, appellant, v Long Island Power Authority, et al., respondents. (Index No. 17396/00)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 21, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until September 6, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27200

A/sl

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.

2004-05636 Gregory P. Gentile, et al., appellants, v Robert Pergament Trust, et al., respondents. (Index No. 31068/95)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 30, 2003.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until August 22, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,

ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted.

H. MILLER, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27162

M/nal

2005-04669 Karen Leech, respondent, v Edward J. Leech, appellant. (Index No. 18566-02)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Appeal by Edward J. Leech from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 11, 2005. By scheduling order dated May 19, 2005, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or

(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or

(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or

(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.

The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is

ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated May 19, 2005, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before July 15, 2005; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27215

T/sl

2004-06452 Alan Rosenfeld, appellant, v Community School District No. 28, et al., respondents. (Index No. 12575/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 4, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondents' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until July 27, 2005, and the respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27213

T/sl

2004-09691 Adam L. Shapiro, et al., respondents, v William Pagan, et al., appellants. (Index No. 16564/01)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 17, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until August 29, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27172

J/sl

2004-11247 Edwin Smith, appellant, v David P. Moore, respondents; John Boyle, et al., defendants- on-the-counterclaims. (Index No. 24345/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 5, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until September 14, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal, which shall include the motion papers considered by the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, in rendering an order dated September 7, 2004, and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27216

T/sl

2004-09495, 2004-09496 Sterling Investor Services, Inc., appellant, v 1155 Nobo Associates, LLC, respondent. (Index No. 16628/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated September 14, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until September 22, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27202

E/sl

THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.

BARRY A. COZIER

WILLIAM F. MASTRO

PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.

2005-05257 Ben Zion Vardi, respondent, v Elahe Vardi, appellant. (Index No. 200276/03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 10, 2005, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom, and cross motion by the respondent for the imposition of a sanction against the appellant.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the cross motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the order dated May 20, 2005, is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from an order of the same court dated June 10, 2005 (see CPLR 5520[c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion and cross motion are denied.

ADAMS, J.P., COZIER, MASTRO and SKELOS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27198

J/sl

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

DANIEL F. LUCIANO

ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.

2004-04654, 2004-08102, 2004-08104 In the Matter of Joshua B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Steven H. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Steven H. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Steven H. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2) In the Matter of Shanice H. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Steven H. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 3) In the Matter of James B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Steven H. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 4) In the Matter of Scott H. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Steven H. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 5) In the Matter of Malik H. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Steven H. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 6) (Docket Nos. N-03477-02, N-03478-02, N-03479-02 N-03480-02, N-03481-02, N-03482-02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

On the court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that its decision and order on motion dated June 7, 2005, in the above-entitled case is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order on motion is substituted therefor:

Motion by the appellant, in effect, to recall and vacate so much of a decision and order on motion of this court entitled "In the Matter of the Dismissal of Causes for Failure to Perfect - February 2005 Calendar", dated February 22, 2005, as dismissed an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 21, 2004 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2004-04654), pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(e) for failure to timely perfect the same, to reinstate that appeal, for leave to prosecute that appeal as a poor person, to assign Lewis S. Calderon, Esq. as counsel to represent the appellant on that appeal, to consolidate that appeal with appeals from two orders of the same court both dated August 25, 2004 (Appellate Division Docket Nos. 2004-08102 and 2004-08104), to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals, and to file a single brief in connection with the appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to recall and vacate so much of the decision and order on motion dated February 22, 2005, as dismissed the appeal from the order dated April 21, 2004 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2004-04654), and to reinstate that appeal are granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for leave to prosecute the appeal from the order dated April 21, 2004, as a poor person, and to assign Lewis S. Calderon, Esq. as counsel to represent the appellant on that appeal are granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated April 21, 2004 will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the Law Guardian, if any. The parties are directed to file 11 copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,

ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant's counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the Law Guardian, if any, when counsel serves the appellant's brief upon those parties; and it is further,

 ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act § 1120 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal from the order dated April 21, 2004:

Lewis S. Calderon, Esq.

90-50 Parsons Blvd. - #405

Jamaica, New York 11432

(718) 883-1560

and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeal from the order dated April 21, 2004, with the appeals from the orders dated August 25, 2004, is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to file a single brief is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the parties shall serve and file 11 copies of the briefs on the appeals; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the appellant's motion which is for an enlargement of time is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing his brief on the appeals is enlarged until July 7, 2005; and it is further,

ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeals are taken.

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27152

Y/sl

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.

2005-04510 In the Matter of Chicago Title Insurance Company, respondent, v Gloria Pascale, appellant. (Index No. 53/05)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay enforcement of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered May 4, 2005, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom and to enjoin the respondent from taking any action to enforce the order and judgment pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that those branches of the motion which are to stay enforcement of the order and judgment entered May 4, 2005, and to enjoin the respondent from taking any action to enforce the order and judgment are granted, and pending hearing and determination of the appeal the enforcement of the order and judgment is stayed and the respondent is enjoined from taking any action to enforce the order and judgment, on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before August 2, 2005; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before August 2, 2005, the court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice; and it is further,

 ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.

H. MILLER, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M26457

L/

In the Matter of the Dismissal of Causes for Failure to Perfect - Di June 2005 Calendar

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION smissal for Failure to timely Perfect

The appellants or petitioners in the following named causes have failed to perfect their respective appeals or proceedings within the time limitations specified in subdivision (e) of section 670.8 of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.8[e]). The titles of the matters appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants or petitioners failed to make applications to enlarge the time to perfect within 10 days after the last date of publication.

Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,

ORDERED that the following named causes are dismissed:

Docket No.Title

2003-09044Klein v State of New York

2003-11365Matter of Avent v Kelly

2004-00349Staton v State of New York

2004-01032Tafari v State of New York

2004-01978Matter of Geller v Dobbs Ferry Union Free School District

2004-02035South Road Associates, LLC v International Business Machines Corp.

2004-02450T&G Associates, LLC v Leonaggeo

2004-03125Muller Associates, LLC v Malang

2004-03645Matter of Hodge v Selsky

2004-03707Sabo v Candero

2004-03796Butt v New York Medical College

2004-04062McNamara v Dav-El Services, Inc.

2004-04336Ahamad v Lupero

2004-04366Coreth v Silver

2004-04569Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. v Lexington Insurance Company

2004-04620Sauvigne v Andrea Electronics Corporation

2004-04638Matter of Suffolk County Department of Social Services v Conley

2004-04926Green v State of New York

2004-05114Operative Cake Corporation v Nassour

2004-05293Langhorne v County of Nassau

2004-05360Matter of Kats v Yaroshenko

2004-05410Adams v Katara

2004-05530Dellon v Dellon

2004-05539Cadet v Kun Chou Yong

2004-05583Mullokandov v Nicholas

2004-05627Matter of Delaurie Associates v Martinez

2004-05769Wolf v Wolf

2004-05974Josephson v Kirkman

2004-05982Matter of Hodge v Goord

2004-06124Matter of Meling v Rumore

2004-06147Wild Avenue Developers, Corporation v Procassini

2004-06264Hall, Dickler, Kent, Goldstein & Wood v Abrams

2004-06273Caliendo v Caliendo

2004-06359Monaco v Idex Corporation, d/b/a Knight Idex

2004-06383Estate of Regina Ort v Ort

2004-06403Estate of Regina Ort v Ort

2004-06404Estate of Regina Ort v Ort

2004-06552Matter of Flournoy v Kings County District Attorney's Office

2004-06559Sanfilippo v Delboriello Funeral Service, Inc.

2004-06607Halstead Quinn Petroleum Company, Inc. v Singer Holding Corporation

2004-06638Brill v Koff

2004-06661Fortune Limousine Service, Inc. v Nextel Communications

2004-06688McKosky v McKosky

2004-06808Matter of Moustakos v Goord

2004-06870Curatolo v Curatolo

2004-07026Fricke v Fricke

2004-07199Sung v Romano

2004-07211Matter of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v Buckley

2004-07215Mueller v Allstate Insurance Company

2004-07226Gallagher v Gallagher

2004-07290Goldstein v New York Times Company

2004-07308Utica First Insurance Company v CDA Group, Ltd.

2004-07357Vargas v Conway Stores, Inc.

2004-07362Muzio v Brown

2004-07387Matter of Coleman v Queens County

2004-07399Matter of Gleason v Gleason

2004-07443Notter v Notter

2004-07501Matter of Palmer v New York State Department of Correctional Services

2004-07510Goldstein v Tucker

2004-07533Matter of In Rem Tax Foreclosure Action No. 47; 126 Holding LLC

2004-07618Rossman v Pitonzo

2004-07639Hicks v Williams

2004-07696Beneficial Mortgage Corporation v Lawrence

2004-07821Parian and Sons Defined Benefit Plan & Trust v Bryant

2004-07850Majestic Designs, Inc. v Modern Importers Corp.

2004-07876Matter of Santos v Yecora

2004-07877Elliott v Siben & Siben

2004-07969Estate of Regina Ort v Ort

2004-07991McDonald v Greenville Shopping Center

2004-07999McKnight, f/k/a Miller v Miller

2004-08156Matter of Vinson v Vinson

2004-08157Matter of Vinson v Vinson

2004-08179Riley v Home Depot USA, Inc.

2004-08230Dialcom LLC v AT&T Corp.

2004-08247Erzingher v New York City Transit Authority

2004-08294Adessa v Litrenta

2004-08448Biggio v Biggio

2004-08524Titus v Mortgage Enterprise, Ltd.

2004-08586Matter of Kaplan v Elmekies

2004-08598Ahmed v Quinteros

2004-08611Mullayev v Mullayev

2004-08637Alexander v Foksher

2004-08642Etzion v Etzion

2004-08659Matter of Estate of Ammon, Deceased

2004-08716Marandos v Marandos

2004-08727Matter of Willard v Meehan

2004-08750Welsh v Okolie

2004-08757Ertel v Connecticut Owners Corp.

2004-08777Brunner v Navon

2004-08780Malaric v New York State Department of Transportation

2004-08781NYCTL 1996-I Trust v R.L. Black 1945 Services, Inc.

2004-08800Omni Court Realty LLC v Town of Clarkstown

2004-08815AYW Networks, Inc. v Teleport Communications Group, Inc.

2004-08817Matter of Kaplan v Nassau County Department of Social Services

2004-08839Hidden Harbor Marine West, Inc. v Great American Insurance Company

2004-08843Martinez-Alvarez v Hassan

2004-08848Halberstam v United Talmudicial Academy Torah V'Yirah Rabbinical, Inc.

2004-08853State Insurance Fund v American Hardware Mutual Insurance Company

2004-08859Ali v Pacheco

2004-08877Dillon v Hilton Beverage

2004-08885Chowdhury v Keyspan Corporation

2004-08886Linn v Forlenza

2004-08890Burgin v The Golub Corporation d/b/a Price Chopper Supermarkets

2004-08894J.G. Operations, LLC v MJ2 Realty, LLC

2004-08900Matter of Wolfer, George; Estate of Georgia M. Wolfer

2004-08907Atwater v DiPasquale

2004-08914Gonis v Noel

2004-08926Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v Andrews

2004-08927Reiter v Reiter

2004-08928Reiter v Reiter

2004-08935Matter of Jennings v Leon

2004-08937Stefanopoulos v Action Aiport Service of L.I., Inc.

2004-08938Adamo v Griffin

2004-08940City of New York v Long Island Power Authority

2004-08941Giles, f/k/a Schoolfield v United Skates of America, Inc.

2004-08948Shah v Communicar, Inc.

2004-08949Shah v Communicar, Inc.

2004-08956Costigan v Renner

2004-08957Matter of Serotoff v Suffolk County Police Department

2004-08966Barberan v City of New York

2004-08968Emigrant Savings Bank v Waugh

2004-08987Matter of Brewster Extra Mart; County of Putnam

2004-08997Slater v Chan

2004-08998Newman v 135 Bedford Road, LLC

2004-09000Guzman v Sands Mill Community Park, Inc.

2004-09002Mancusi v Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

2004-09006Cruz v Frata

2004-09007People of State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer v Wellness & Fitness Ce

2004-09014Anesthesia Associates of Mount Kisco, LLP v Northern Westchester Hospi

2004-09023Dunefsky v S & S Hair Design, Inc.

2004-09032Berkman v Berkman

2004-09036Shalamoff v Furer

2004-09044Lee v BM Sunquest, LLC

2004-09050Rhames v Southampton Bay Resorts, Inc.

2004-09082Azor v Steigward

2004-09084Williams v Mill Bergen Pool

2004-09089Washington v Perez

2004-09095McCall v Geico

2004-09097Castro v Rodriguez

2004-09099Pinnock v Amenecer Mexicano, Inc.

2004-09120Hirsh v Black

2004-09125Landau v Grunhut

2004-09126Donnelly v City of New York

2004-09130Hirsch v Hirsch

2004-09132Gorziska v City of New Rochelle

2004-09133Coreth v Silver

2004-09134Salazar v Kealy

2004-09140Matter of Morus; Stella K. Golanec, an Alleged Incapacitated Person

2004-09145Weissman v Cohen

2004-09146Slater v Chan

2004-09159Matter of Darkside Entertainment, Inc. v Town Board of the Town of Is

2004-09163Torrento v Produce Warehouse, Inc.

2004-09164Mega Contracting, Inc. v First Financial Insurance Company

2004-09166Monahan v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

2004-09171McCarron v Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.

2004-09178Mondesir v Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers, School of Nursing

2004-09186Whittemore v The Port Authority of New York

2004-09188Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v Joseph

2004-09190Horsford v Board of Education of City of New York

2004-09196Washington Mutual Bank, FA v Salmon

2004-09197Emigrant Savings Bank v Waugh

2004-09199Siemerling v Hudson Resources, Inc.

2004-09201Davis v Collins

2004-09222Matter of J.T. Stayprem, Inc. v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village

2004-09223Philippe v Town of Clarkstown

2004-09224Espinoza v Bermeo

2004-09236V&W Realty v Sieber

2004-09240Matter of Sease v State of New York

2004-09243Martorano v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

2004-09244Hollis v Kellog

2004-09246Hanlon v Tomlin

2004-09265I.B.E. Cosmetics, Inc. v Utica National Assurance Company

2004-09266Hartuv v CBC Leasing, Inc.

2004-09280Homeside Lending, Inc. v Chamberlain

2004-09281Lopez v GEM Gravure Company

2004-09283Marino v Hirsch

2004-09287Brown v Rana

2004-09291Czernicki v Lawniczak

2004-09308Dittmer v Terzian

2004-09312Bidosky v Alliance Energy Corporation

2004-09316International Television Broadcatting, Inc. v Yogiraj

2004-09323Riemenschneider v Riemenschneider

2004-09324Riemenschneider v Riemenschneider

2004-09329Matter of Pisacano v The Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Southold

2004-09333Matter of Brent v Vidurek, d/b/a Custom Built

2004-09361Matter of Ambrose v New York State Office of Children & Family Service

2004-09362Matter of V., Courtney Elizabeth; Suffolk County Department of Social

2004-09365Scott v Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

2004-09367Scott v Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

2004-09375Staten Island Emergency Physicians, P.C. v Staten Island University Ho

2004-09377Wirsing v Donzi Marine, Inc.

2004-09381Davis v Wadhera

2004-09383Singh v Sukhdeo

2004-09393Anagnostakos v City of New York

2004-09395Bonowitz v Alex Figliolia Contracting, Inc.

2004-09396Monahan v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

2004-09397Monahan v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

2004-09407Neokleous v Neokleous

2004-09419Matter of Estate of Angelina Voci, Deceased

2004-09424Matter of Lynch v Town of Southampton

2004-09445Matter of Mayers v Birchwood At Spring Lake Home Owner's Assoc., Inc.

2004-09468Paulino v WPR Parking, Inc.

2004-09475Deccan Star, Inc. v Yetim

2004-09478Rodriguez v Bettan

2004-09480Motelson v Candon Court Homeowners Association, Inc.

2004-09489Cohen v Robinson

2004-09490Aziz v Aziz

2004-09509Amato v Shayani

2004-09519Lohier v Quails Department Store, Inc.

2004-09541Matter of Arvan; Estate of Esther Shepard, Deceased

2004-09547Khaled v 45 Wall Street, LLC

2004-09548Ocasio v Royal Insurance Company of America

2004-09553Diaz v First Home Brokerage, LLC

2004-09556Rocca v Marbury

2004-09559Bruno v Tranquillas

2004-09561Staudter v Staudter

2004-09564Mirjah v New York City Transit Authority

2004-09582Kalaitzidis v Pappas

2004-09583Waks v Shapiro

2004-09584Silverman v City of New York

2004-09596Stoffman v Silverstein

2004-09597Haas v Ramos

2004-09598Haas v Ramos

2004-09600Manely v Sutter Avenue LLC

2004-09602Ghabros v American Transit Insurance Company

2004-09606Matter of Martin v State of New York

2004-09609Wells Fargo Bank v Rosenblum

2004-09616Matter of Sovronsky v K., Thomas

2004-09624Greenberg v Greenberg

2004-09630Baggott v Chupka

2004-09643Matter of B., Khadrek Leroy; St. Vincents Services, Inc.

2004-09650Commissioner State Insurance Fund v Empire Management & Productions, I

2004-09652Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation v Nieves

2004-09658American Express Travel Rel. Svcs. v Shakaichi

2004-09666Green v Hesse

2004-09681Bennett v Kasten

2004-09685Doretsky v Long Beach Medical Center

2004-09686Matter of Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company v McNeil

2004-09692Delgado v Delgado

2004-09697Williams v Eason

2004-09698Estate of Macchia v County of Nassau

2004-09703Xiu-Hua Chi v Rothstein

2004-09707Mechanical Response, Inc. v Fantis Food, Inc.

2004-09711Burnette v City of New York

2004-09719Powell v Alade

2004-09725Aspromonte v Aspromonte

2004-09732Gibson v Urban Resources Institute

2004-09739Trinidad v New York & Presbyterian Hospital Cornell Medical Center

2004-09743Nisbeth v Supermarkets General Corp.

2004-09746Dallal v Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C.

2004-09778Macaluso v Macaluso

2004-09785Marwin v Daimlerchrysler Corporation

2004-09808Beneficial Mortgage Corporation v Lawrence

2004-09821Matter of Howes, Wendy; Hoews, Mary; Fraser, Constance; Alfred S. Howe

2004-09825South Pacific Funding Corporation v McNally

2004-09826Matter of Walsh, Martin M.; County of Westchester

2004-09835Colarossi v McDonald's

2004-09846Gursel v Southern Westchester Urology Group, P.C.

2004-09858Stewart v State of New York

2004-09866Mazza v Koslowe

2004-09878Roache v State of New York

2004-09883Coyle v Windsor Development Corp.

2004-09884Tuizer v Gulack

2004-09886Perez-Singh v New York City Housing Authority

2004-09909Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v Connelly

2004-09911Diederich v Finch

2004-09917Ramirez v Baic Cab Corp.

2004-09920Matter of Siegel v Planning Board of the Town of Brookhaven

2004-09931Elisano v L.I.C. Rest Group Operations, LLC

2004-09940Cintron v State of New York

2004-09942Rao v Downstate Medical Centre

2004-09948Stanislaus v State of New York

2004-09954Cegan Properties Co. v Beach House Owners Corp.

2004-09960Blanc v Domingo

2004-09962Blanc v Domingo

2004-09965Goodall v Koizumi

2004-09968Brathwaite v Gallo

2004-09975Palermo v County of Hempstead

2004-09976Dinkelacker v Incorporated Village of Mineola

2004-09983Katina, Inc. v Town of Hempstead

2004-09986Kagan v Farber

2004-09989Lopez v GEM Gravure Company

2004-09991Russo v City of New York

2004-09998Shamayeva v G. Fazio Construction Co., Inc.

2004-09999Murray v New York City Transit Authority

2004-10000Cedello v Kelly

2004-10001Abraham a/k/a Avi Ulman v Johnson

2004-10002Lloyd v M. Paladino, Inc.

2004-10009Matter of Government Employees Insurance Company v Leibowitz

2004-10014Woodmont Properties Meadows, LLC v Venice Land Development, LLC

2004-10019Gallo v Rea Motors, Inc.

2004-10028Korn v Village of Westhampton Beach

2004-10030Matter of George v Cameron

2004-10039Stafford v Viacom, Inc.

2004-10043Corredine v VW Credit, Inc.

2004-10045Greenpoint Bank v Harripersaud

2004-10051Cahn v Squires

2004-10056Thomas v State of New York

2004-10064Emigrant Savings Bank v Conte

2004-10076Nasca v Town of Brookhaven

2004-10078Guillen v Arcilesi

2004-10079Guillen v Guillen

2004-10109Altman v Finger

2004-10118Fakhouri v Patel

2004-10124Kavanaght-Mary v Estate of Frederic Mary

2004-10127Viggiano v Viggiano

2004-10133Friel v Papa

2004-10158Beaulieu v S.B.J. Associates, LLC

2004-10160Oliva v Clarkstown Central School District

2004-10172281 Sutter Avenue Realty Corp. v 141-36 Rockaway Boulevard Realty Corp

2004-10188Abdelhamid v Soifils

2004-10189Zephyr v Romanus

2004-10191Mackins v Bass Cab Corporation

2004-10192Gleissner v Brickman Associates

2004-10194Tulman v Lopez

2004-10196Job v Brookdale Hospital Medical Center

2004-10198Portnoy v City of New York

2004-10200Kolomeyer v Brightwater Tower Associates

2004-10211Matter of Hong Mai v New York State Department of Welfare

2004-10213Volpe v Volpe

2004-10215Brissett v Darcon Construction, Inc.

2004-10220Citimortgage, Inc. v Brown

2004-10223Oriska Insurance Company v Perri

2004-10224Tigreros v City of New York

2004-10226Bendenoun v United States Golf Association

2004-10229Galeano v New York City Transit Authority

2004-10232Murillo v Patel

2004-10234Segall v Segall

2004-10235Vidal v Vidal

2004-10247Bell v Marcella

2004-10249O'Connor v O'Connor

2004-10252Milbrandt & Co., Inc. v Griffin

2004-10260Wachovia Bank National Association v DeLeo

2004-10264Hunt v Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.

2004-10265Villatoro v Grand Boulevard Realty, Inc

2004-10269Thruway Center Associates, L.P. v AM Associates

2004-10273Five Star Contracting Companies v Landmark Construction & Restoration,

2004-10283Diaz v Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn

2004-10284Henry v Spauldings

2004-10309Doherty v Doherty

2004-10319King v Salvaggio

2004-10323Textron Financial Corporation v Friedman

2004-10348Bengard v Bengard

2004-10352Veasey v Lapinid

2004-10361Matter of Slutzky v Kaufman

2004-10365Yassen v Yassen

2004-10375Rodriguez v Montesdeoca

2004-10394Schmid v Suffolk County Water Authority

2004-10405Poinvil v Mathiue

2004-10410People ex rel. Rawlins o/b/o David Turner v Amicucci

2004-10414Matter of DeGregorio v Town of Mount Pleasant Planning Board

2004-10417Interim Settlement Funding Co. v Fiorito

2004-10430Muller v Muller

2004-10433Tan v Mojica-Tan

2004-10440Wright v Madison Home Equities, Inc.

2004-10443Wright v Madison Home Equities, Inc.

2004-10450Castanares v Atlantic Heydt Corporation

2004-10454Green Point Bank v Simon

2004-10483Unger v Leviton

2004-10507Riverside Capital Advisers, Inc. v First Secured Capital Corporation

2004-10508Autorino v Ferreyra

2004-10511Senn v Senn

2004-10519Jeffrey L. Rosenberg & Associates, LLC v Isaacs

2004-10523Evans v Knight

2004-10525Brown v Best

2004-10529Durso v Stankevich

2004-10531Islam v Johnson

2004-10532Sayegh v Sayegh

2004-10534Charles v Gold Star Limousine Corporation

2004-10541Matter of Rohena v Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company

2004-10543Sonneberg v Sonneberg

2004-10552Freedman v Cataldo

2004-10564Thatos v Bryant Park Grill

2004-10568Coppola v Hernandez

2004-10571Krutovoi v Knox

2004-10573America Business Mortgage Services, Inc. v Faulkner

2004-10600Matalon v Mizrachi

2004-10605Vaca v Victor CNC Systems, Inc.

2004-10612Cupid v Cupid

2004-10613Matter of Pope, An Incapacitated Person; Stroud

2004-10626Barnes v New York City Housing Authority

2004-10646Romano v Romano

2004-10653Dugan v Dugan

2004-10654Capurso v Sachem Central School District

2004-10670Monaco v Idex Corporation

2004-10679Ahlers v State of New York

2004-10689Matter of Daily v New York State Department of Correctional Services

2004-10729Singh v New York City Fire Department

2004-10731Matter of Allstate Insurance Company v Montanez

2004-10733Matter of Government Employees Insurance Company v Raymond

2004-10734Pena v City of New York

2004-10743Burgin v Mid-Hudson Associates, LLC

2004-10746Dorsch v Goldman

2004-10754Thruway Center Associates, L.P. v AM Associates

2004-10788Matter of Government Employees Insurance Company v Thomas

2004-10801Strain v Westhampton Beach Teachers' Association

2004-10827Rowland v City of New York

2004-10834United Realty Corp. v C.G.R. Store Contractors, Inc.

2004-10836Alhamoud v Wells

2004-10842Walls v Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

2004-10876Nextel of New York, Inc. v Zarb

2004-10882Unger v Leviton

2004-10883Hector v Leejay Associates, LLC

2004-10888Sullivan v Boccia Bros., Inc.

2004-10889Moncayo v Moncayo

2004-10890Moncayo v Moncayo

2004-10894Kalaba v Caballero

2004-10901Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v Laub

2004-10905Most v Mott

2004-10949Leventer v New Life Builders & Carpenters, Inc.

2004-11032Skoboleva v Crecco

2004-11197Starrett Seafood Market, Inc. v Starrett City, Inc.

2004-11219Matter of Steel v New York State Division of Parole

2004-11243Fleet National Bank v Malone

2005-00225Rina v Tahay

2005-00348Matter of Rabbi Yehuda Krinsky; Merkos L'Inyonei Church, Inc.

2005-01374Matter of Estate of Margitte Denman, Deceased; Denman v Denman

2005-01875Benak v General Star Indemnity Company

2005-02313Matter of Moore v Kelly

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27020

A/sl

ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

STEPHEN G. CRANE

STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.

2005-00783 In the Matter of Robert Mackey, petitioner, v Warden, Suffolk County Correctional Facility, respondent.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the petitioner pro se for leave to reargue a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition and mandamus, which was determined by decision, order and judgment of this court dated March 28, 2005.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

SCHMIDT, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, CRANE and FISHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M26995

A/sl

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

BARRY A. COZIER

DAVID S. RITTER

STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.

2005-05163 In the Matter of Candita A. Rawlins, respondent, v Arthur Kevin Williams, appellant. (Docket No. F-1599-04)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated May 20, 2005, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a stay of enforcement of the order is denied; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel are granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the Law Guardian, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,

 ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant's counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the Law Guardian, if any, when counsel serves the appellant's brief upon those parties; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act § 1120 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

Kent V. Moston, Esq.

Legal Aid Society of Nassau County

One Helen Keller Way

Hempstead, New York 11550

(516) 560-6400

and it is further,

ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any scheduling order or orders issued pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,

ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.

H. MILLER, J.P., COZIER, RITTER and FISHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27201

A/sl

ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

WILLIAM F. MASTRO

REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.

2003-09491 The People, etc., respondent, v John Douglas, appellant. (Ind. No. 10540/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 24, 2003, to expand the judgment roll to include, inter alia, the minutes of the Grand Jury proceedings in this case, and to release those minutes to the appellant.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to expand the judgment roll to include the minutes of the Grand Jury proceedings is granted, and the People shall file the Grand Jury minutes in question with the Clerk of this court, and those minutes shall remain sealed upon delivery; and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.

SCHMIDT, J.P., S. MILLER, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27013

E/sl

A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.

ROBERT W. SCHMIDT

FRED T. SANTUCCI

DANIEL F. LUCIANO

ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.

2002-00671, 2005-03060 The People, etc., respondent, v Carmine Picciano, appellant. (S.C.I. Nos. 01-484, 01-1006)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

On the court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that the decisions and orders on motion of this court dated April 4, 2002, and November 26, 2003, respectively, in the above-entitled matter, are amended by (1) deleting from the captions thereof the words "Ind. No. 01-01006" and substituting therefor the words "S.C.I. Nos. 01-484, 01-1006"; (2) deleting from the introductory paragraphs thereof the words "a judgment" and substituting therfor the words "two judgments"; and (3) deleting from the decretal paragraphs thereof the word "appeal" and substituting therefor the word "appeals."

PRUDENTI, P.J., SCHMIDT, SANTUCCI, LUCIANO and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27192

Y/sl

A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.

ANITA R. FLORIO

HOWARD MILLER

STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.

2001-06961, 2004-02799 The People, etc., respondent, v Earl Williams, appellant. (Ind. No. 855/00)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from (1) a decision and order of this court, dated March 14, 2005, which denied his application for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this court dated April 7, 2003 (see People v Williams, 304 AD2d 595), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 3, 2001, and (2) a decision and order on application of this court dated April 28, 2004, which denied his application for leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 3, 2003.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M27194

Y/sl

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.

THOMAS A. ADAMS

DANIEL F. LUCIANO

PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.

2005-02581 The People, etc., ex rel. Walter J. Roache, petitioner, v S.A. Connell, etc., respondent.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the petitioner, a State inmate under sentence for conviction of a crime, for leave to reargue a prior motion, pursuant to CPLR 1101 for permission to prosecute the above-entitled proceeding as a poor person, which was determined by decision and order on morion dated April 18, 2005.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, LUCIANO and SKELOS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court