Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30017
Y/sl
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
JOSEPH COVELLO, JJ.
|
2005-07042 Alayne Real Estate, et al., respondents, v Alan D. Lasher, et al., appellants. (Index No. 11134/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal |
Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 13, 2005, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Munz v La Guardia Hosp., 109 AD2d 731).
SCHMIDT, J.P., SANTUCCI, LUCIANO and COVELLO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29941
E/sl
SONDRA MILLER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
REINALDO E. RIVERA
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2005-05230 Milton Berlin, respondent, v Patricia Wojnarowski, appellant, et al., defendants. (Index No. 29153/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondent on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 15, 2005, to strike certain parts of the appendix on the ground that the material is dehors the record and, in effect, to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the issues raised on that appeal are precluded by the doctrine of Bray v Cox (38 NY2d 350).
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is held in abeyance and is referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.
S. MILLER, J.P., RITTER, RIVERA and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29934
CF/
|
2005-00259 Blue Moon of Freeport, Inc., respondent, v Arthur Fishbein, et al., appellants, et al., defendants. (Index No. 3342/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 30, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29950
CF/
|
2005-05385 Stephen Burke, et al., appellants, v Board of Managers of Greenridge Estates Condominium, et al., respondents. (Index No. 10956/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 29, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29986
J/sl
|
2005-01690
C.V. Longo Mechanical Service, Inc., appellant, v Donna Reis, et al., respondents. (Index No. 14404/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent Spectrum Construction Corporation, d/b/a Spectrum Skanska USA pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 19, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the time of the respondent Spectrum Construction Corporation, d/b/a Spectrum Skanska USA to serve and file a brief is enlarged until October 19, 2005, and that respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29987
S/sl
|
2005-07319
Sharon Chervin, etc., respondent, v Jerzy Macura, etc., et al., appellants. (Index No. 36659/04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 14, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until October 31, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30011
Y/sl
SONDRA MILLER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
REINALDO E. RIVERA
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2004-07539 Rachel Greenbaum, appellant, v Dwight L. Hershman, etc., respondent. (Index No. 5570/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 11, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until October 7, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
S. MILLER, J.P., RITTER, RIVERA and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29938
CF/
|
2005-06599 Yves Martine Lalanne, et al., respondents, v Nicholas Klein, etc., et al., appellants. (Index No. 6861/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated May 16, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30013
J/sl
|
2005-01253
Keitly Lavaud, a/a/o Don N. Nixon, a/k/a Donnon N. Nixon, appellant, v Country Wide Insurance Company, respondent. (Index No. 25595/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 18, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until October 12, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29935
CF/
|
2005-04393 Peter Lazares, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v Park Plaza Property, LLC, et al., defendants-respondents, Waldbaums Supermarket, appellant. (Index No. 6747/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 18, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29952
CF/
|
2005-04701 Felix Mack, respondent, v John Brennan, etc., appellant. (Index No. 5978/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 11, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30033
L/
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
STEPHEN G. CRANE
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2005-01354
Jon L. McCarthy, respondent, v Otis H. Miller, appellant. (Index No. 16278/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Withdraw Appeal on Stipulation |
Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 10, 2005.
Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties, dated August 25, 2005, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
H. MILLER, J.P., CRANE, KRAUSMAN, RIVERA and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29931
CF/
|
2005-06550 Francisco Melesio, et al., respondents, v Lawrence Oaks Limited Partnership, et al., appellants. (and a third-party action). (Index No. 997/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant Lawrence Oaks Limited Partnership to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 15, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by Lawrence Oaks Limited Partnership is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30029
L/
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
STEPHEN G. CRANE
DAVID S. RITTER
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2004-01861 New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens, a/a/o David McNeal, et al., appellants, v Clarendon National Insurance Company, respondent. (Index No. 8254/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Withdraw Appeal on Stipulation |
Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 10, 2004.
Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties, dated August 11, 2005, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
H. MILLER, J.P., SCHMIDT, CRANE, RITTER and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29997
S/sl
|
2005-02079 Maribel Araseli Ortiz, etc., et al., appellants, v Robert Ortiz, et al., defendants, Kirk M. Jensen, respondent (and a related action). (Index No. 3554/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 25, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until November 7, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30016
J/sl
|
2004-10753, 2005-02878 Scott Parkin, et al., appellants, v Louis S. Ederer, et al., respondents. (Index No. 25851/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 9, 2004, and February 1, 2005, respectively.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondents' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until October 21, 2005, and the respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29988
S/sl
|
2005-03972
Ronald Parr, appellant-respondent, v Ronkonkoma Realty Venture I, LP, et al., respondents-appellants.
(Index No. 11041/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 8, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant-respondent's reply brief shall be served and filed on or before October 19, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29989
S/sl
|
2005-01234
Dimitrios Psomostithis, appellant, v Transoceanic Cable Ship Co., respondent. (Index No. 34619/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 22, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until October 19, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30030
L/
SONDRA MILLER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
REINALDO E. RIVERA
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2004-11022 Jose Reyes, respondent, v Delerimar Realty Corp., et al., appellants. (Index No. 17582/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellants for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 17, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
S. MILLER, J.P., RITTER, RIVERA and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29981
S/sl
|
2004-09836
Rockland Transit Mix, Inc., appellant, v Rockland Enterprises, Inc., et al., respondents. (Index No. 8346/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 13, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before October 12, 2005.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29969
J/sl
|
2005-00470 Maguy C. Sica, appellant, v Aristede Manns, Jr., et al., respondents. (Index No. 50544/01)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 19, 2004.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until October 5, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29949
CF/
|
2005-02501 Madline Smith, appellant-respondent, v Ameriquest Mortgage Company, et al., respondents-appellants, Daniel Chan, et al., respondents. (Index No. 32879/02)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the respondents-appellants to withdraw a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 25, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29982
J/sl
|
2005-02322
Sheyna Streletskaya, appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, respondent. (Index No. 36764/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 14, 2005.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until October 4, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30035
L/
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
STEPHEN G. CRANE
ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.
|
2004-09982 Techcon Contracting, Inc., respondent, v Village of Lynbrook, appellant, Cameron Engineering & Associates, LLP, defendant. (Index No. 1557/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 14, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
FLORIO, J.P., RITTER, CRANE and LIFSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29946
CF/
|
2005-07742 281 Sutter Avenue Realty Corp., appellant, v 141-36 Rockaway Boulevard Realty Corp., et al., respondents. (Index No. 24775/03)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 20, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30032
L/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
|
2005-00776 Sherri L. Trunk, et al., respondents, v Michael D. Spross, appellant. (Index No. 6085/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Withdraw Appeal on Stipulation |
Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 20, 2004.
Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties, dated August 23, 2005, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30031
L/
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
MARK C. DILLON, JJ.
|
2004-10366, 2005-04474
Danielle Turner, appellant, v Cool Wind Ventilation Corp., et al., respondents. (Index No. 13205/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Withdraw Appeal on Stipulation |
Application to withdraw appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated October 12, 2004, and March 16, 2005, respectively.
Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties, dated July 13, 2005, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
H. MILLER, J.P., SANTUCCI, GOLDSTEIN and DILLON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29822
J/sl
|
2004-09369
Thomas Vincente, et al., respondents, v Roy Kay, Inc., appellant (and a third-party action). (Appeal No. 1) 2005-00447 Thomas Vincente, et al., appellants-respondents, v Roy Kay, Inc., defendant first and second third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant; RJR Mechanical, Inc., third-party defendant- respondent-appellant; Leewen Contracting Corp., second third-party defendant-respondent-appellant. (Appeal No. 2) 2005-02577 Thomas Vincente, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v Roy Kay, Inc., defendant first and second third-party plaintiff-respondent; RJR Mechanical, Inc., third-party defendant-appellant; Leewen Contracting Corp., second third-party defendant- appellant. (Appeal No. 3) (Index No. 13377/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the plaintiffs Thomas Vincente and Rosalie Vincente pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated January 4, 2002 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2004-09369), and February 1, 2005 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2005-02577), respectively, and an appeal and cross appeals from an order of the same court dated November 23, 2004 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2005-00447).
ORDERED that the application is granted and the plaintiffs' time to perfect the appeal from the order dated November 23, 2004 is enlarged until October 23, 2005, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and the plaintiffs' brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that on or before November 22, 2005, RJR Mechanical, Inc. and Leewen Contracting Corp. shall perfect the appeal from the order dated February 1, 2005, by serving and filing a brief on that appeal, which shall also include their arguments on the cross appeal from the order dated November 23, 2004; and it is further,
ORDERED that on or before December 22, 2005, Roy Kay, Inc., shall perfect the appeal from the order dated January 4, 2002, by serving and filing a brief on that appeal, which shall also include its arguments on the cross appeal from the order dated November 23, 2004, and in response on the appeal from the order dated February 1, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that on or before January 23, 2006, the plaintiffs shall serve and file their reply brief on all appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that on or before February 2, 2006, RJR Mechanical, Inc., Leewen Contracting Corp., and Roy Kay, Inc., shall serve and file their respective reply briefs on all appeals.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29995
Y/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.
|
2005-01962 In the Matter of Alan Blumen, et al., petitioners, v Robert C. McGann, etc., et al., respondents.
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the petitioners for leave to reargue a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, which was determined by decision and order of this court dated May 31, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied, without costs or disbursements.
COZIER, J.P., RITTER, SANTUCCI and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29940
CF/
|
2005-07237, 2005-07239 In the Matter of Symonee BB Cavallo, respondent, v Antonio Cavallo, appellant. (Docket No. O-6690-04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated June 3, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeals are marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29948
CF/
|
2005-07550 In the Matter of Richard L. Phillips, appellant, v Robin S. Pagano, respondent. (Docket No. F-8916-04)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated July 14, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30025
S/sl
SONDRA MILLER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
REINALDO E. RIVERA
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2005-01487
In the Matter of Jose Rivera, appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, etc., et al., respondents. (Index No. 5167/04)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 20, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondents' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until September 30, 2005, and the respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
S. MILLER, J.P., RITTER, RIVERA and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29929
C/sl
SONDRA MILLER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
REINALDO E. RIVERA
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2004-09004 In the Matter of Daniel P. Urban, etc., appellant, v Nicholas LaConti, Jr., respondent. (Index No. 16041/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 20, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until October 25, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
S. MILLER, J.P., RITTER, RIVERA and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29942
CF/
|
2005-04500 In the Matter of Ellyn Weisfelner, appellant, v Lawrence Schwartz, respondent. (Docket No. F-695-97)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION Application to Withdraw Appeal |
Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated April 12, 2005.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29871
C/sl
BARRY A. COZIER, J.P.
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2004-00222 In the Matter of Jomo Williams, petitioner, v Glen S. Goord, etc., et al., respondents.
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the petitioner, inter alia, to recall and vacate a decision and order on motion of this court dated June 15, 2004, which dismissed a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition for failure to comply with a decision and order on motion of this court dated February 9, 2004, which directed that the petitioner pay the filing fee within 120 days, or the proceeding would be dismissed, to reinstate the proceeding, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation or opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
COZIER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29657
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-03416
The People, etc., respondent, v Rafael Bordenave, appellant.
(Ind. No. 80-00309)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 10, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated March 10, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Mark Diamond, Esq.
Box 287356
Yorkville Station
New York, New York 10128
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated March 10, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30026
S/sl
SONDRA MILLER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
REINALDO E. RIVERA
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2003-06462
The People, etc., respondent, v Troy Brown, appellant.
(Ind. No. 713/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 16, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until October 18, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
S. MILLER, J.P., RITTER, RIVERA and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29755
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-03494
The People, etc., respondent, v Perry Crosby, appellant.
(Ind. No. 10396/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 25, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated February 25, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated February 25, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29702
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-05677
The People, etc., respondent, v Daniel Edell, appellant.
(Ind. No. 2612/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated May 3, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated May 3, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Steven A. Feldman, Esq.
626 EAB Plaza
West Tower - 6th Floor
Uniondale, New York 11556
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated May 3, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29656
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-03000
The People, etc., respondent, v William Elting III, appellant.
(Ind. No. 23/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated March 15, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated March 15, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Gary E. Eisenberg, Esq.
129 Brooks Avenue
Monroe, New York 10950
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated March 15, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29749
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-06746
The People, etc., respondent, v Carlos Fadul, appellant.
(Ind. No. 10718/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 22, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated April 22, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated April 22, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29665
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-03417
The People, etc., respondent, v Vincenzo Giambalvo, appellant.
(Ind. No. 1395-03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 7, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated March 7, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Steven A. Feldman, Esq.
626 EAB Plaza
West Tower - 6th Floor
Uniondale, New York 11556
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated March 7, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29753
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-04021
The People, etc., respondent, v Rene Hernandez, appellant.
(Ind. No. 10634/97)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 30, 2005, which determined that branch of his motion which was pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the portion of the order which determined that branch of the defendant's motion which was to reduce his sentence is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the portion order dated March 30, 2005, which determined that the branch of the defendant's motion which was to reduce his sentence; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming that portion of the order dated March 30, 2005, as determined that branch of the motion which was to reduce the defendant's sentence on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29706
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-02918
The People, etc., respondent, v Stacy King, a/k/a Edmond Coles, appellant.
(Ind. No. 02-00213)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Rockland County, dated February 17, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated February 17, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Del Atwell, Esq.
P.O. Box 2516
Montauk, New York 11954
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated February 17, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29305
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-06740
The People, etc., respondent, v Angel D. Lebron, appellant.
(Ind. No. 82/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated June 1, 2005, which, upon, in effect, granting reargument, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated February 23, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated June 1, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Gary E. Eisenberg, Esq.
129 Brooks Avenue
Monroe, New York 10950
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated June 1, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29758
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-05500
The People, etc., respondent, v Yaish Malka, appellant.
(Ind. No. 10357/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 10, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated May 10, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated May 10, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29752
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-04438
The People, etc., respondent, v Anthony Parker, a/k/a Alvin Walker, appellant.
(Ind. No. 3904/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 14, 2005,which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated April 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated April 14, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29704
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-05626
The People, etc., respondent, v Madison Purvey, appellant.
(Ind. No. 99-00763)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Orange County, dated April 21, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated April 21, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Del Atwell, Esq.
P.O. Box 2516
Montauk, New York 11954
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated April 21, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29652
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-03623
The People, etc., respondent, v Elvis Rodriguez, appellant.
(Ind. Nos. 127/99, 79/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated March 15, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated March 15, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Gary E. Eisenberg, Esq.
129 Brooks Avenue
Monroe, New York 10950
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated March 15, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M30027
S/sl
SONDRA MILLER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
REINALDO E. RIVERA
PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.
|
2004-04291 The People, etc., respondent, v Ralph Salierno, appellant. (Ind. No. 636-03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 26, 2004.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until October 17, 2005, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
S. MILLER, J.P., RITTER, RIVERA and SKELOS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29750
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-03500
The People, etc., respondent, v Sean Stephen, appellant.
(Ind. No. 4588/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 16, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated February 16, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated February 16, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29708
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-05538
The People, etc., respondent, v Kelvin Subgidio, appellant.
(Ind. No. 99-00095)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Rockland County, dated April 12, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated April 12, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Del Atwell, Esq.
P.O. Box 2516
Montauk, New York 11954
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated April 12, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29700
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-05378
The People, etc., respondent, v Thomas Taranto, appellant.
(Ind. No. 2908/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated April 18, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated April 18, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Steven A. Feldman, Esq.
626 EAB Plaza
West Tower - 6th Floor
Uniondale, New York 11556
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated April 18, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M29756
F/
THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
ROBERT A. LIFSON
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
|
2005-02471
The People, etc., respondent, v Felix Vazquez, appellant.
(Ind. No. 11133/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 23, 2005, which determined his motion pursuant to chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004, to reduce his sentence, and, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied as unnecessary as the order is appealable as of right (see L 204, Ch 238, § 23); and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant's moving papers are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from the order dated February 23, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the application which is, in effect, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel is granted, and the following attorney is assigned as counsel to represent the defendant on the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the parties are directed to show cause why an order should or should not be made and entered summarily affirming the order dated February 23, 2005, on the ground that pursuant to the defendant's certificate of conviction (see CPL 60.60), a copy of which is attached hereto, the defendant does not stand convicted of a class A-I felony, and therefore is not subject to the provisions of the statute (see L 204, Ch 738), by filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before November 14, 2005; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the defendant by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60(2), at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined, and by regular mail upon the attorney herein assigned to represent the defendant and upon the District Attorney.
ADAMS, J.P., MASTRO, LIFSON and LUNN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court