Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department MOTION DECISIONS FOR OCTOBER 27, 2004

TITLECase Number
Arcamona v Nussbaum2004-04026
Astoria Caterers v J&P 1870 Realty Corporatio2004-06177
Baker v Alamo-Ratliff2004-08857
Baranek v Baranek2004-03673
Barnes v Oceanus Navigation Corporation, Ltd.2003-03743 +1
Barnes v Oceanus Navigation Corporation, Ltd.2004-02687
Braun v Mikvah Israel of Boro Park2004-06178
Bretthauer v Frisco2004-04107
Cendant Mortgage Corporation v Packes2003-06808 +1
Chlap v 43rd Street-Second Avenue Corporation2004-04035
Delloro v Looking Glass Associates, LLP2004-03752
Dermigny v Dermigny2004-02032
Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh v Castro2004-04405
Dwyer v County of Nassau2004-04216
Edwards v Berland2004-05524
Engelmann v Worby, Groner & Edelman, LLP2004-04393
Ferlisi v Ditmars Real Estate Consultants, In2004-05515
4004, Inc., d/b/a Steve & Barry University Spo2004-04217
Fox Linen Service, Inc. v Great Rock Golf Cat2004-06577
Galandauer v Gabriel Management Corporation2004-03927
George v Kelly2004-01870
Goldberg v Trump Village Section 3, Inc.2004-06218
Ismailov v Walker2004-01159 +1
Lakoski v Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.2004-08062
Lynch v Maspeth Hall, Inc.2004-04403
Magarine v Bruckner Southern, LLC2004-02177
Malankara Archdiocese of Syrian Orthodox Church,2004-03914
McCormack v Town of Pawling2004-08526
National Organization of Industrial Trade Uni2004-07589
Navin v Navin2003-08775 +6
O'Connor v Enright Marble & Tile Corp.2004-04973
Rubin v Reyes2004-06512
Ryan v Ryan2004-02004
Santo v Santo2004-06580
Santos v Intown Associates2004-06802
Smithtown Galleria II, LLC v Gmytrasiewicz2004-03659
Unger v Unger2004-08651
Vague v Freidberg2004-04707
Ventresca Realty Corp. v Houlihan Parnes Corp2004-00505
Weber v Goss2004-02647
Yellow Book of New York, Inc., f/k/a Yellow B2004-05307
Zysk v Bley2004-06971
Mtr of Gallegos v Administration for Children2004-03132
Mtr of Higgs-Green v Higgs2004-07293
Mtr of Lee v Lee2003-04600
Mtr of McDuffie v Brock2004-07875
Mtr of Mendlowitz v Mendlowitz2004-07398
Mtr of Ramos v Andino2004-07694
Peo v Ackridge, Ronald2003-03926 +1
Peo v Ackridge, Ronald2004-06370
Peo v Alexander, Deshawn2002-09868
Peo v Allah, Shariff2003-05508
Peo v Barrett, Mark2004-08665
Peo v Branch, Ohlin2004-08137
Peo v Campbell, Howard2001-05692
Peo v Catts, Kentweal2004-02373
Peo v Clark, Richenel2003-02357
Peo v Dallas, Calvin L., Jr.2004-03840
Peo v Fiore, Thomas V.2004-06569
Peo v Friedman, Stuart2002-11478
Peo v Gonzalez, Jose2002-05530
Peo v Jackson, Kenroy2002-08679
Peo v Mays, Curtis2004-07490
Peo v Quinichett, Andrew, a/k/a Boo2004-08559
Peo v Rendon, Jairo2004-08177
Peo v Sokol, Mariusz2003-06369
Peo v Steward, Darren2004-08190
Peo v Subgidio, Kelvin2004-08363
Peo v Thomas, Darshaun2004-04292
Peo v Thompson, Rahmel2003-05153
Peo v Toellner, Robert2004-08446
Peo v Weinsheimer, Francis Jr.2004-08337
Peo v Wilson, Robert2004-07303







Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17490

PL/sl

2004-04026

Charles Arcamona, et al., respondents,

v Monte J. Nussbaum, appellant,

et al., defendant.

(Index No. 5171/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 31, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 27, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17497

CF/

2004-06177

Astoria Caterers, plaintiff-respondent,

v J & P 1870 Realty Corporation, et al.,

defendants-appellants; Peter Gangemi,

et al., defendants-respondents.

(Index No. 44717/99)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 7, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17498

C/sl

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.

2004-08857

Billie Jo Baker, et al., respondents,

v Alamo-Ratliff, et al., appellants.

(Index No. 21965/00)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 2, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17496

CF/

2004-03673

Mark Baranek, appellant, v

Karin Baranek, respondent.

(Index No. 27691/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 9, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17538

S/sl

2003-03743, 2003-07411

Richard Barnes, et al., respondents,

v Oceanus Navigation Corporation, Ltd.,

appellant.

(Index No. 9300/00)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 10, 2003, and a judgment of the same court, dated July 15, 2003.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondents' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until November 29, 2004, and the respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17539

S/sl

2004-02687

Richard E. Barnes, et al., appellants,

v Oceanus Navigation Corporation, Ltd.,

respondent.

(Index No. 9300/00)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 27, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until November 29, 2004, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17482

CF/

2004-06178

Chaim Braun, et al., respondents, v

Mikvah Israel of Boro Park, defendant,

United States Underwriters Insurance

Company, et al., appellants.

(Index No. 690/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 24, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17531

CF/

2004-04107

Joan A. Bretthauer, respondent, v

Nick M. Frisco, appellant.

(Index No. 1015/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated April 15, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17457

C/sl

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

THOMAS A. ADAMS

STEPHEN G. CRANE

ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.

2003-06808, 2003-06809

Cendant Mortgage Corporation, respondent,

v James Packes, Jr., appellant.

(Index No. 392/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the respondent to dismiss appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, both dated May 28, 2004, on the ground that the appeals have been rendered academic.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is referred to the Justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

H. MILLER, J.P., ADAMS, CRANE and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17516

S/sl

2004-04035

Leonardo Chlap, et al., appellants,

v 43rd Street-Second Avenue Corporation,

et al., respondents.

(Index No. 43270/01)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 5, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 27, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17517

S/sl

2004-03752

Arlene R. Delloro, appellant,

v Looking Glass Associates, LLP.,

etc., et al., respondents.

(Index No. 4647/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated March 17, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 13, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17554

CF/

2004-02032

Ellen Dermigny, appellant,

v Nicholas Dermigny, respondent.

(Index No. 13078/99)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 2, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17501

C/sl

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.

2004-04405

Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh, etc.,

respondent, v Maria Castro, a/k/a Maria A. Castro,

appellant, et al., defendants.

(Index No. 8958/03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 13, 2004, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see CPLR 5511; Marino v Termini, 4 AD3d 342).

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17481

CF/

2004-04216

John J. Dwyer, plaintiff-respondent, v County

of Nassau, defendant-respondent, Nassau

County University Medical Center, appellant.

(Index No. 17789/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 16, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17500

CF/

2004-05524

Tracey Edwards, appellant, v Susan

Berland, et al., respondents.

(Index No. 25482/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 24, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17537

CF/

2004-04393

Anton Engelmann, et al., appellants, v Worby,

Groner & Edelman, LLP, et al., respondents.

(Index No. 1073/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 6, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17530

CF/

2004-05515

Michael J. Ferlisi, appellant, v Ditmars Real

Estate Consultants, Inc., et al., respondents.

(Index No. 26376/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 28, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17532

CF/

2004-04217

4004, Inc., d/b/a Steve & Barry University

Sportsware, appellant, v Pacific Insurance

Company Limited, et al., respondents.

(Index No. 14575/00)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 26, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17527

CF/

2004-06577

Fox Linen Service, Inc., respondent,

v Great Rock Golf Caterers, LLC,

d/b/a Blackwells, appellant.

(Index No. 11675/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 8, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17536

CF/

2004-03927

Barbara Galandauer, appellant, v Gabriel

Management Corporation, et al., respondents.

(Index No. 15001/01)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 12, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17489

CF/

2004-01870

Suresh D. George, et al., respondents, v

Frances Kelly, et al., defendants, North

Shore University Hospital at Glen Cove,

appellant.

(Index No. 14025/99)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 11, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17488

CF/

2004-06218

Mollie Goldberg, respondent, v Trump Village

Section 3, Inc., et al., defendants, Plaza Construction

Corp., appellant.

(Index No. 36942/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 14, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17546

E/sl

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.

2004-01159, 2004-01160

Ariel Ismailov, et al., respondents,

v Floyd S. Walker, appellant.

(Index No. 02-31538)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the respondents on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 28, 2003, and a judgment of the same court, dated December 16, 2003, to dismiss the appeal from the order on the ground that it was untimely taken, and cross motion by the appellant to direct the respondents to provide him with copies of all of the documents marked as exhibits at the inquest on December 2, 2003. Application by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the cross motion, and the application, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements as the order dated November 28, 2003 was superseded by the judgment dated December 16, 2003 (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248); and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic; and it is further,

ORDERED that the cross motion is granted, and on or before November 12, 2004, the respondents shall provide the appellant with copies of all of the documents in their possession marked as exhibits at the inquest on December 2, 2003; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the application which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the judgment is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeal from the judgment is enlarged until December 13, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal from the judgment and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,

ORDERED that the application is otherwise denied as academic.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17483

CF/

2004-08062

Theodore J. Lakoski, etc., respondent,

v Stop & Shop Companies, Inc., appellant.

(Index No. 901/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 24, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17480

CF/

2004-04403

Thomas Lynch, et al., appellants,

v Maspeth Hall, Inc., et al., respondents.

(Index No. 8354/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 24, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17542

CF/

2004-02177

Stephen Magarine, appellant-respondent,

v Bruckner Southern, LLC, et al., respondents,

Eller Media, Co., respondent-appellant

(and a third-party action).

(Index No. 1583/99)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the respondent-appellant to withdraw a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 14, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the cross appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17512

PL/sl

2004-03914

Malankara Archdiocese of the Syrian Orthodox

Church, N.A., et al., appellants, v Malankara

Jacobite Center, et al., respondents.

(Index No. 13610/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 29, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 29, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17534

CF/

2004-08526

Christina McCormack, et al., respondents,

v Town of Pawling, et al., appellants.

(Index No. 793/00)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant Town of Pawling to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated September 15, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal by Town of Pawling is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17555

CF/

2004-07589

National Organization of Industrial Trade

Unions, respondent, v Kate Bronfenbrenner,

et al., appellants.

(Index No. 1309/04)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellants to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 15, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17540

S/sl

2003-08775, 2003-08776, 2003-08777,

2003-08778, 2003-08779, 2003-10443,

2003-11119

Nancy E. Navin, respondent,

v Richard Navin, appellant.

(Index No. 2890/99)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 21, 2003, an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court, entered September 3, 2003, three orders of the same court, all dated August 21, 2003, an order of the same court dated October 27, 2003, and a judgment of the same court dated November 5, 2003.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's brief that was submitted to the Clerk of this court on or about October 21, 2004, is accepted for filing; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant's reply brief, if any, shall be served and filed on or before November 8, 2004.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17503

E/sl

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.

2004-04973

Richard O'Connor, et al., respondents,

v Enright Marble & Tile Corp., et al.,

appellants.

(Index No. 6856/03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellants on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 16, 2004, to stay the trial on damages in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17499

C/sl

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.

2004-06512

Lance Rubin, respondent,

v Salud Reyes, appellant.

(Index No. 202131/01)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending the hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 14, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17398

C/sl

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

STEVEN W. FISHER

ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.

2004-02004

John Ryan, respondent,

v Marylou Ryan, appellant.

(Index No. 5015/97)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated November 12, 2003, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements as no appeal lies from a judgment entered upon the default of the appellant (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic.

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FISHER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17550

E/sl

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

STEVEN W. FISHER

ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.

2004-06580

Stephanie Santo, appellant, v

Lee Santo, respondent.

(Index No. 6431/04)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant, in effect, for summary reversal of stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 30, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FISHER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17541

O/sl

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

THOMAS A. ADAMS

STEPHEN G. CRANE

ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.

2004-06802

Silvio Santos, et al., respondents,

v Intown Associates, et al., appellants.

(Index No. 14206/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 28, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondents' time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until November 1, 2004, and the respondents' brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,

ORDERED that no further enlargements of time shall be granted.

H. MILLER, J.P., ADAMS, CRANE and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17514

PL/sl

2004-03659

Smithtown Galleria II, LLC, respondent,

v George Gmytrasiewicz, et al., appellants

(Index No. 20362/02)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 16, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 20, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17494

Y/sl

ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.

BARRY A. COZIER

REINALDO E. RIVERA

STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.

2004-08651

Arthur Unger, appellant,

v Jeanne Unger, respondent.

(Index No. 201418/04)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 13, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and all proceedings in the above-entitled action are stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before November 29, 2004; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before November 29, 2004, the court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.

SCHMIDT, J.P., COZIER, RIVERA and FISHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17511

PL/sl

2004-04707

Clotilde Vague, et al., respondents,

v Daniel Friedberg, etc., et al., appellants.

(Index No. 30180/00)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 11, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellants' time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 24, 2005, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17543

S/sl

2004-00505

Ventresca Realty Corp., respondent,

v Houlihan Parnes Corp., n/k/a 455 Central

Corp., appellant.

(Index No. 8051/01)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 12, 2003.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until November 12, 2004, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17506

PL/sl

2004-02647

Linda Weber, respondent,

v Brooks Goss, et al., appellants.

(Index No. 17607/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 11, 2004.

ORDERED that the application is granted and the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until November 22, 2004, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17491

CF/

2004-05307

Yellow Book of New York, Inc., f/k/a

Yellow Book of New York, LP, respondent,

v Eli Shitrit, appellant.

(Index No. 16497/03)

ORDER ON APPLICATION
Application to Withdraw Appeal

Application by the appellant to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 26, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is marked withdrawn.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17458

C/sl

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

THOMAS A. ADAMS

STEPHEN G. CRANE

ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.

2004-06971

Irena Zysk, appellant, v Leonard M. Bley, defendant,

Brooklyn Eye Surgery Center, LLC, respondent.

(Index No. 19715/01)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the respondent, inter alia, in effect, to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 16, 2004.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order which is not the result of a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701[a][2], [3]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal, without prejudice to the appellant taking an appeal from any judgment entered on the order.

H. MILLER, J.P., ADAMS, CRANE and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17437

M/nal

2004-03132

In the Matter of David Gallegos, appellant,

v Administration for Children's Services, et al.,

respondents.

(Docket No. V-36564-03)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Appeal by David Gallegos from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 25, 2004. By scheduling order dated September 13, 2004, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or

(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or

(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or

(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or

(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.

The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is

ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated September 13, 2004, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before November 15, 2004; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17464

C/sl

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.

ROBERT W. SCHMIDT

BARRY A. COZIER

REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.

2004-07293

In the Matter of Esther M. Higgs-Green,

etc., respondent, v James Higgs, appellant.

(Docket No. O-00151-03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, entered May 18, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied, with leave to the appellant to renew, on or before November 29, 2004, upon the submission of proper papers establishing that he is entitled to poor person relief, including the appellant's affidavit setting forth the appellant's full financial situation including all assets, both real and personal, as well as any and all sources of income, and itemized expenses.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SCHMIDT, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17547

S/sl

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

STEVEN W. FISHER

ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.

2003-04600

In the Matter of Patricia Lee, appellant,

v Gregory Lee, respondent.

(Docket No. F-2375/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

On the court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that its decision and order on motion dated October 25, 2004, in the above-entitled matter is amended by deleting from the first line of the first decretal paragraph the word "respondent's" and substituting therefor the word "appellant's".

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FISHER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17441

M/nal

2004-07875

In the Matter of Tarneka McDuffie, appellant,

v Camille Brock, respondent.

(Docket No. V-19963-03)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Appeal by Tarneka McDuffie from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 2, 2004. By scheduling order dated September 16, 2004, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or

(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or

(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or

(4) if the appellant was indigent and could not afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this court for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101; or

(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.

The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is

ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated September 16, 2004, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before November 15, 2004; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17442

M/nal

2004-07398

In the Matter of Elizabeth Mendlowitz, respondent,

v Joshua Mendlowitz, appellant.

(Docket No. O-00402-03)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Appeal by Joshua Mendlowitz from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated July 22, 2004. By scheduling order dated September 16, 2004, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or

(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or

(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or

(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.

The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is

ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated September 16, 2004, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before November 15, 2004; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17443

M/nal

2004-07694

In the Matter of Madeline Ramos, appellant,

v James Andino, respondent.

(Docket No. V-3581/99)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Appeal by Madeline Ramos from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated July 30, 2004. By scheduling order dated September 16, 2004, the appellant was directed to file one of the following in the office of the Clerk of the court, within 30 days after the date of the scheduling order:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there were no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or

(2) if there were such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript was received, and indicating the date that it was received; or

(3) if the transcript was not received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it was ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript was expected; or

(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal.

The appellant has failed to comply with the scheduling order. Pursuant to § 670.4(a)(5) of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][5]), it is

ORDERED that the parties or their attorneys are directed to show cause before this court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated September 16, 2004, by each filing an affirmation or affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before November 15, 2004; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this decision and order upon the parties or their attorneys.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17356

S/sl

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.

2003-03926, 2004-06370

The People, etc., respondent,

v Ronald Ackridge, appellant.

(Ind. No. 02-6168)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Motion for Poor Person Relief
and to Assign Counsel - Appeal
From Order Denying Motion to
Vacate Judgment

Motion by the defendant for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 27, 2004, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of conviction against him, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel, and to consolidate this appeal with an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered April 17, 2003.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition or relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,

ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any hearing on the motion, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of the proceeding set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

Lisa H. Blitman, Esq.

20 West 87th Street - #6D

New York, New York, 10024

and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,

ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.

H. MILLER, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellant's Address

03 A 5497

Riverview Corr. Fac.

Box 247

Ogdensburg, New York 13669




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17353

S/sl

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.

2004-06370

The People, etc., respondent,

v Ronald Ackridge, appellant.

(Ind. No. 02-6168)

DECISION, ORDER AND CERTIFICATE
GRANTING LEAVE TO APPEAL
ON MOTION

Application by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 27, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is granted; the defendant is granted leave to appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 27, 2004, made in this case; and it is further,

CERTIFIED that said order involves questions of law or fact which ought to be reviewed by the Appellate Division, Second Department; and it is further,

ORDERED that the papers which accompanied this application are deemed to be a timely notice of appeal from said order.

ANITA R. FLORIO

Associate Justice



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17392

F/

A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.

DAVID S. RITTER

FRED T. SANTUCCI

ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.

2002-09868

The People, etc., respondent,

v Deshawn Alexander, appellant.

(Ind. No. 9286/01)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant's assigned counsel for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 1, 2002.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17418

F/

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

STEVEN W. FISHER

ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.

2003-05508

The People, etc., respondent,

v Shariff Allah, appellant.

(Ind. No. 4773/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant's assigned counsel for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief on an

appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 10, 2003.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FISHER, and LIFSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17519

F/

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.

2004-08665

The People, etc., plaintiff,

v Mark Barrett, defendant.

(Ind. No. 7349/99)

DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 2, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is denied.

FRED T. SANTUCCI

Associate Justice



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17303

F/

ROBERT A. LIFSON, J.

2004-08137

The People, etc., plaintiff,

v Ohlin Branch, defendant.

(Ind. No. 4070/96)

DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 17, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is denied.

ROBERT A. LIFSON

Associate Justice



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17470

C/sl

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.

ROBERT W. SCHMIDT

BARRY A. COZIER

REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.

2001-05692

The People, etc., respondent,

v Howard Campbell, appellant.

(Ind. No. 6218/00)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Motion for an Enlargement of Time
to File a Supplemental Brief

Motion by the appellant pro se for an enlargement of time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 18, 2001.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appellant's supplemental pro se brief shall be served and filed on or before December 30, 2004; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SCHMIDT, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17424

F/

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

BARRY A. COZIER

ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.

2004-02373

The People, etc., respondent,

v Kentweal Catts, appellant.

(Ind. No. 118/03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Motion for Poor Person Relief
and to Assign Counsel
Appeal from Judgment

Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 9, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,

ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,

ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

Salvatore Adamo, Esq.

PMB 185

414 West Sunrise Highway

Patchogue, New York 11772-2254

and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,

ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.

H. MILLER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, COZIER, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellant's address:

120 Franklin Street

Poughkeepsie, New York 12601




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17422

F/

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

THOMAS A. ADAMS

STEPHEN G. CRANE

ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.

2003-02357

The People, etc., respondent,

v Richenel Clark, appellant.

(Ind. No. 3675/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant's assigned counsel for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 27, 2003.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

H. MILLER, J.P., ADAMS, CRANE, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17429

F/

DAVID S. RITTER, P.J.

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

THOMAS A. ADAMS

STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.

2004-03840

The People, etc., respondent,

v Calvin L. Dallas Jr., appellant.

(Ind. No. 116/03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Motion by Counsel to be Relieved

Motion by assigned counsel to be relieved of an assignment to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered April 23, 2004. The appellant's motion for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel was granted on June 8, 2004, and the following named attorney was assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

David Goodman, Esq.

Public Defender

22 Market Street

Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the former assigned counsel is directed to turn over all papers in the action to new counsel herein assigned; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

Ethel P. Ross, Esq.

P.O. Box 347 - Route 35

Cross River, New York 10518

and it is further,

ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy if the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.), and written directions.

RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, ADAMS, and CRANE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellant's address:

04 A 2525

Downstate Corr. Fac.

Red Schoolhouse Road

P. O. Box 445

Fishkill, New York 12524




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17426

F/

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

BARRY A. COZIER

REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.

2004-06569

The People, etc., respondent,

v Thomas V. Fiore, appellant.

(Ind. No. 78/04)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Motion for Poor Person Relief
and to Assign Counsel
Appeal from Judgment

Motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered July 15, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,

ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,

ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

Kevin Gilleece, Esq.

399 Knollwood Road - Suite 206

White Plains, New York 10603

and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,

ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, COZIER, and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellant's address:

04 A 4306

Downstate Corr. Fac.

Red Schoolhouse Road

P.O. Box 445

Fishkill, New York 12524




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17372

F/

A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.

DAVID S. RITTER

FRED T. SANTUCCI

ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.

2002-11478

The People, etc., respondent,

v Stuart Friedman, appellant.

(Ind. No. 264/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant's assigned counsel for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 3, 2002.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17474

C/sl

NANCY E. SMITH, J.P.

THOMAS A. ADAMS

STEPHEN G. CRANE

PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.

2002-05530

The People, etc., respondent,

v Jose Gonzalez, appellant.

(Ind. No. 01-00669)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to serve and file a pro se supplemental reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered April 25, 2002.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

SMITH, J.P., ADAMS, CRANE and SKELOS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17416

F/

ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN

STEVEN W. FISHER

ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.

2002-08679

The People, etc., respondent,

v Kenroy Jackson, appellant.

(Ind. No. 8484/01)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the assigned counsel for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief on an

appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 10, 2002.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FISHER, and LIFSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17373

F/

A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.

DAVID S. RITTER

FRED T. SANTUCCI

MYRIAM J. ALTMAN

ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.

2004-07490

The People, etc., respondent,

v Curtis Mays, appellant.

(Ind. No. 642/03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Motion for Poor Person Relief
and to Assign Counsel
Appeal from Judgment

Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered August 25, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,

ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,

ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

Leslie Rubin, Esq.

1 East Cherry Street

Floral Park, New York 11001

and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,

ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellant's address:

04 A 4883

Downstate Corr. Fac.

Box F

Fishkill, New York 12524




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17520

F/

HOWARD MILLER, J.

2004-08559

The People, etc., plaintiff,

v Andrew Quinichett, a/k/a Boo, defendant.

(Ind. No. 36-91)

DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated August 18, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is denied.

HOWARD MILLER

Associate Justice



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17521

F/

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.

2004-08177

The People, etc., plaintiff,

v Jairo Rendon, defendant.

(Ind. No. 1060/00)

DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 21, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is denied.

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

Associate Justice



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17423

F/

HOWARD MILLER, J.P.

THOMAS A. ADAMS

STEPHEN G. CRANE

ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.

2003-06369

The People, etc., respondent,

v Mariusz Sokol, appellant.

(Ind. No. 205-94)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Motion to Dismiss Appeal

Motion by the respondent to dismiss as abandoned an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered June 13, 2003.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[f]; CPL 470.60[1]).

H. MILLER, J.P., ADAMS, CRANE, and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17507

C/sl

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P.

SONDRA MILLER

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.

2004-08190

The People, etc., respondent,

v Darren Steward, appellant.

(Ind. No. 8371/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the defendant for a change of venue of the trial of Kings County Indictment No. 8371/02 from the Supreme Court, Kings County, to another county.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the defendant may renew his application for a change of venue, if necessary, after the completion of voir dire, and the motion is otherwise denied as premature (see People v Boudin, 95 AD2d 463).

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17518

F/

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.

2004-08363

The People, etc., plaintiff,

v Kelvin Subgidio, defendant.

(Ind. No. 99-00095)

DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Rockland County, dated September 2, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is denied.

FRED T. SANTUCCI

Associate Justice



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17375

F/

A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.

DAVID S. RITTER

FRED T. SANTUCCI

MYRIAM J. ALTMAN

ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.

2004-04292

The People, etc., respondent,

v Darshaun Thomas, appellant.

(Ind. No. 785-03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Motion for Poor Person Relief
and to Assign Counsel
Appeal from Judgment

Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 7, 2004, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,

ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,

ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order and upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

Robert C. Mitchell, Esq.

Legal Aid Society of Suffolk County - Appeals Bureau

Post Office Box 1697

Riverhead, New York 11901-3398

and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,

ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellant's address:

04 A 2126

Gouverneur Corr. Fac.

Box 480

Gouverneur, New York 13642




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17421

F/

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.

ROBERT W. SCHMIDT

BARRY A. COZIER

REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.

2003-05153

The People, etc., respondent,

v Rahmel Thompson, appellant.

(Ind. No. 328/02)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 22, 2003, and to be furnished with a copy of the typewritten transcript of the proceedings, if any.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the District Attorney shall file the transcript of the proceedings, if any, and the Clerk of this court shall deliver those minutes to the person in charge of the institution wherein the appellant is incarcerated for examination by the appellant; the transcript shall be returned to this court when the appellant files the supplemental brief or informs this court that no supplemental brief will be filed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant shall file nine copies of the supplemental brief and serve one copy on the District Attorney.

Upon delivering the minutes to the institution, the Clerk of this court shall adv ise the appellant of the date by which the minutes are to be returned and the brief filed.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SCHMIDT, COZIER, and RIVERA, JJ.,

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Appellant's Address:

03 A 3043

Upstate Corr. Fac.

Box 2001

Malone, New York 12953




Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17304

F/

ROBERT A. LIFSON, J.

2004-08446

The People, etc., plaintiff,

v Robert Toellner, defendant.

(Ind. No. 97-01403)

DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated August 26, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is denied.

ROBERT A. LIFSON

Associate Justice



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17351

K/sl

ROBERT A. LIFSON, J.

2004-08337

The People, etc., plaintiff,

v Francis Weinsheimer, Jr., defendant.

(Ind. No. 2080/03)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the defendant pursuant to CPL 530.45 to be released on his own recognizance, or in the alternative, to fix bail after his conviction in the County Court, Suffolk County, on July 21, 2004, of burglary in the first degree and sexual abuse in the third degree. The trial court remanded the defendant pending the imposition of sentence.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic. The defendant was sentenced on October 4, 2004.

ROBERT A. LIFSON

Associate Justice



Go to Top. Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M17114

F/

NANCY E. SMITH, J.

2004-07303

The People, etc., plaintiff,

v Robert Wilson, defendant.

(Ind. No. 417/94)

DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION

Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 6, 2004, which has been referred to me for determination.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the application is denied.

NANCY E. SMITH

Associate Justice