APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4462
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-03738
Albany Insurance Company, etc., respondent, v National Experts Assistance, Inc., et al., defendants, Jackson Heights Shopping Center, appellant.
(Index No. 25290/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated May 20, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 19, 2003, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to July 22, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4455
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-11362, 2002-11364, 2002-11365
David Barkley, appellant, v Maura Barkley, respondent. (Index No. 18934/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated August 14, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, all dated October 8, 2002, on or before September 15, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeals have not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4472
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00824
Anna Berezny, et al., appellants, v New Sans Souci Nursing Home, respondent. (Index No. 11384/99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated July 31, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 5, 2002, on or before September 15, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4463
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00570
Clifford Fred Bould, Jr., appellant, v Ann Marie Bould, a/k/a Ann Marie Saulnier, et al., respondents.
(Index No. 4175/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated July 7, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 23, 2002, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to September 12, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4527
L/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCE E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00084 Michael Chisholm, respondent, v American Asset Recovery, et al., defendants, W.J. Northridge Construction Corp., appellant (and a third-party action).
(Index No. 17635/99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION Withdraw Appeal on Stipulation |
Application to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 9, 2002.
Upon the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties, dated October 24, 2003, it is
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs or disbursements.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4464
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00300
Geraldine Cole, respondent, v James Makowski, appellant.
(Index No. 9307/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated July 8, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 25, 2002, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to September 2, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4452
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-11300
Damianos Realty Group, LLC, respondent, v Port Jefferson Orthopaedics, P.C., appellant.
(Index No. 11747/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 17, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 1, 2002, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to August 11, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4466
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00563
Jane Doe, respondent-appellant, v Merck & Company, Inc., et al., appellants- respondents, et al., defendants. (Index No. 10786/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated July 7, 2003, the appellants-respondents and respondent-appellant were directed to perfect an appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 14, 2002, on or before September 8, 2003, and October 8, 2003, respectively. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal and cross appeal have not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants-respondents and respondent-appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal and cross appeal are dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4435
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-09977
Jasmine Laila Doha, et al., appellants, v Radha Persaud, respondent.
(Index No. 8007/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated July 1, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 1, 2002, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to July 30, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4474
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00733
Anam Duke, et al., appellants, v City of New York, et al., respondents. (Index No. 29288/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated August 1, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 5, 2002, on or before September 15, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4441
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-10590
Robert Edelstein, respondent, v Lynn C. Edelstein, appellant. (Index No. 08656/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated May 15, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 10, 2002, on or before August 8, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4458
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00452
Hanie Eng, et al., respondents, v Lisa Sichenzia, et al., appellants, et al., defendants. (Index No. 818/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 16, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated November 25, 2002, on or before August 25, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4461
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00614
Alfred Farrell, appellant, v SFDS Development Corporation, a/k/a St. Francis De Sales Development Corp., et al., respondents (and a third-party action). (Index No. 4101/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 9, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 12, 2002, on or before September 11, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4406
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-08459 Federal National Mortgage Association, respondent, v Bonnee Linden, appellant. (Index No. 8282/95)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated August 14, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 28, 2002, on or before September 19, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4444
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-10678
First Trust National Association, respondent, v Daniel David, et al., appellants, et al., defendant. (Index No. 4222/99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated August 5, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 7, 2002, on or before September 15, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4446
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-10755
Fleet Mortgage Corporation, respondent, v Richard P. Sullivan, et al., appellants, et al., defendants. (Index No. 98-7986)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated April 25, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated September 6, 2002, on or before June 13, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4413
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-09375
Diane Gibb, appellant, v James D. Gibb, et al., respondents. (Index No. 10777/97)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 11, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 28, 2002, on or before July 21, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4459
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00461
Eric Goldfine, et al., respondents, v Lisa Sichenzia, et al., appellants, et al., defendants. (Index No. 817/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 16, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated November 25, 2002, on or before September 4, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4400
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-06161
Robert Goldstein, et al., appellants, v Charles Miller, etc., respondent (and related actions). (Index No. 6429/96)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated May 13, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 5, 2002, on or before June 27, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4447
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-11020
Sylvia Greenberg, appellant, v William Dinkes, et al., respondents. (Index No. 23103/99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated May 30, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 17, 2002, on or before August 25, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4410
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-09168, 2002-09175
James J. Houlihan, respondent, v Great Hunger Foundation, Inc., et al., appellants. (Index No. 02-10965)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated March 31, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, both entered August 30, 2002, on or before May 21, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeals have not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4467
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00863
Elgie Hughes, respondent, v John Hughes, appellant.
(Index No. 12371/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated July 15, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 20, 2002, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to September 15, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4475
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00486
Paul O. Hynard, appellant, v Daniel A. Conti, respondent. (Index No. 5753/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated August 1, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 11, 2002, on or before September 2, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4453
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-11361
Independence Community Bank, respondent, v Health Care Concept, Inc., et al., appellants. (Index No. 31011/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 19, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 10, 2002, on or before July 24, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4422
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-09662
J. I. Kislak Mortgage Corp., respondent, v Linda M. Lindsay, et al., defendants; Queene E. Cavette, nonparty-appellant. (Index No. 327/94)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 23, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 4, 2002, on or before July 29, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4470
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-00405
Mohamed Jebrane, appellant, et al., plaintiff, v Magnolia Giraldo, et al., respondents. (Index No. 13763/99)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated July 25, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 24, 2002, on or before September 8, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4498
T/sl
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.
|
2003-09652 Robert Justice, et al., appellants, v City of New York, defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent, et al., defendants; Welsbach Electric Corp., third-party defendant-respondent. (Index No. 32507/92)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 9, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before December 15, 2003; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before December 15, 2003, the court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, or the respondents may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.
ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4502
M/sl
|
2003-05225
Michael Katz, appellant, et al., plaintiffs, v Jules Roberts, respondent. (Index No. 17793/00)
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated may 12, 2003.
ORDERED that the application is granted and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 4, 2004, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4438
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-10402
Kensington Village, Inc., appellant, v Town of New Hyde Park, respondent. (Index No. 2997/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated May 19, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 30, 2002, on or before September 4, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4418
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-09443
Jacek Kepski, respondent-appellant, v M.G. Huntington, LLC, appellant-respondent.
(Index No. 44921/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated April 4, 2003, the appellant-respondent was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 2002, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to June 16, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant-respondent failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4505
C/sl
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.
|
2003-09464 Jean Kushman, respondent, v Kenneth Kushman, appellant. (Index No. 9250/97)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 6, 2003.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4456
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-11505
Edward Lanoce, respondent, v Maurice Kempton, et al., appellants.
(Index No. 18337/94)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 11, 2003, the appellants were directed to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 7, 2002, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to August 15, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellants failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4425
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-09714
Linda Lee, appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, et al., respondents. (Index No. 30850/96)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated April 25, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 12, 2002, on or before June 17, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4420
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-09482
Craig S. Lynn, appellant, v Jennifer B. Lynn, respondent. (Index No. 28497/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated April 18, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 2, 2002, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to June 9, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4476
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2003-01676
Thomas Mercado, plaintiff-respondent, v Brause Plaza, Inc., defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent, Staegate Electrical Contractors, Inc., appellant.
(Index No. 10741/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated August 25, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 16, 2003, by a date certain, and by so ordered stipulation that date was extended to September 11, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since the latter date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h) it is,
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4437
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-10140
Maryanne F. Nicastro, appellant, v Michael J. Nicastro, respondent. (Index No. 18134/98)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated April 14, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 8, 2002, on or before June 30, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4402
V/A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-07994 Anthony Palmer, appellant, v State of New York, respondent. (Claim No. 103724)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 12, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dated August 9, 2002, on or before July 25, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4457
V/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
ANITA R. FLORIO
NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
|
2002-11557
Denise Ramos, respondent, v Ferron Samuels, et al., defendants, Diana Santana, appellant. (Index No. 41865/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
By order of this court dated June 12, 2003, the appellant was directed to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 14, 2002, on or before August 12, 2003. More than 30 days have elapsed since that date and the appeal has not been perfected. The title of the matter appeared on a dismissal calendar published in the New York Law Journal, and the appellant failed to make an application to cure the default within 10 days after the last date of publication.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(h), it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, FLORIO and SMITH, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4180
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-04515
The People, etc., respondent, v Carl Madison, appellant.
(Ind. No. 1213/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 8, 2003, a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
03 A 4318
Downstate Corr. Fac.
Box F
Fishkill, New York 12524
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4150
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-01266
The People, etc., respondent, v Dana Middleton, appellant.
(Ind. No. 7194/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 22, 2002, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
03 A 0820
Sing Sing Corr. Fac.
354 Hunter Street
Ossining, New York 10562
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4178
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-07092
The People, etc., respondent, v Barry Mitchell, appellant.
(Ind. No. 3731/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 1, 2003, a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
03 A 4319
Downstate Corr. Fac.
Box F
Fishkill, New York 12524
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4525
E/sl
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P.
SONDRA MILLER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.
|
2001-02768 The People, etc., respondent, v William Noel, a/k/a Edward Noel, appellant. (Ind. No. 00-00025)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se to enlarge the time to serve and file a supplemental brief on an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered February 2, 2001.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied as academic as the supplemental pro se brief was filed November 6, 2003; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the respondent's time to serve and file a brief in response to the supplemental pro se brief is enlarged until January 16, 2004, and the respondent's brief must be served and filed on or before that date.
ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
01 A 1337
Oneida Corr. Fac.
Box 4580
Rome, New York 12458
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4179
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-07558
The People, etc., respondent, v Luis Perez, appellant.
(Ind. No. 262/01)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 24, 2003, a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
03 A 4177
Clinton Corr. Fac.
Box 2000
Dannemora, New York 12929
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4172
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-07324
The People, etc., respondent, v Comfort Pinckney, appellant.
(Ind. No. 1497/00)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 29, 2003, a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
03 A 4262
Downstate Corr. Fac.
Box F.
Fishkill, New York 12524
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4181
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-07094
The People, etc., respondent, v Rmell Rogers, appellant.
(Ind. No. 2134/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 6, 2003, a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
03 A 4434
Sing Sing Corr. Fac.
354 Hunter Street
Ossining, New York 10562
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4288
F/
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P.
ANITA R. FLORIO
WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN
HOWARD MILLER, JJ.
|
2003-07240
The People, etc., respondent, v Joanne Taylor, appellant.
(Ind. No. 585/03)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered July 18, 2003, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Martin Goldberg, Esq.
P.O. Box 326
Franklin Square, New York 11010
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
ALTMAN, J.P., FLORIO, FRIEDMANN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's address:
Please make inquiry to the State Inmate Locator
New York State Department of Correctional Services
Telephone: (518) 457-0043
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4182
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-05992
The People, etc., respondent, v Larry Thomas, appellant.
(Ind. No. 547/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 26, 2003, a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
03 A 3827
Watertown Corr. Fac.
23147 Swan Road
Watertown, New York 13601
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4153
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-06112
The People, etc., respondent, v Sylvester Vallee, appellant.
(Ind. No. 2634/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 30, 2003, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
03 R 3834
Gowanda Corr. Fac.
Box 350, South Road
Gowanda, New York 14070
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4167
F/
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.
|
2003-07067
The People, etc., plaintiff, v Mervyn Walden, defendant. (Ind. No. 1830/90)
| DECISION & ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Application by the defendant, pursuant to CPL 450.15 and 460.15 for a certificate granting leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 4, 2003, which has been referred to me for determination.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the application is denied.
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
Associate Justice
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4345
F/
NANCY E. SMITH, J.P.
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.
|
1997-05343
The People, etc., respondent, v JabbarWashington , appellant.
(Ind. No. 2585/96)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Renewed motion by the appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 14, 1997, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
SMITH, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO and TOWNES, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
97 A 2934
Shawangunk Corr. Fac.
Box 700
Wallkill, New York 12589
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4183
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-07095
The People, etc., respondent, v Dennis Williams, appellant.
(Ind. No. 3825/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 6, 2003, a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
385 Bayview Avenue
Inwood, New York 11096
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
M4154
F/
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
FRED T. SANTUCCI
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
|
2003-07507
The People, etc., respondent, v Michael Williams, appellant.
(Ind. No. 7552/02)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion for Poor Person Relief and to Assign Counsel - Appeal from Judgment |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 30, 2003, as a poor person, and for the assignment of counsel.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the appellant's and the respondent's briefs; the parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the stenographer of the trial court is directed promptly to make, certify, and file two transcripts of the proceedings of any pretrial hearings, of the plea of guilty or of the trial, and of the imposition of sentence in this action, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (see 22 NYCRR 671.9); and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event that the case was tried to a conclusion before a jury, the stenographer shall also make, certify, and file two transcripts of the minutes of proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the trial court shall furnish one certified transcript of each of the proceedings set forth above to the appellant's counsel, without charge (see CPL 460.70); assigned counsel is directed to turn over those transcripts to the respondent when counsel serves the appellant's brief on the respondent; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the stenographer has already prepared a copy of any of the minutes for a codefendant, then the Clerk of the trial court is directed to reproduce a copy thereof for assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that upon service of a copy of this decision and order upon it, the Department of Probation is hereby authorized and directed to provide assigned counsel with a copy of the presentence report prepared in connection with the defendant's sentencing, including the recommendation sheet and any prior reports on the defendant which are incorporated in or referred to in the report; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event an issue as to the legality, propriety, or excessiveness of the sentence is raised on appeal, or if assigned counsel cites or relies upon the probation report in a brief or motion in any other way, counsel shall provide a complete copy of such report and any attachments to the court and the District Attorney's office prior to the filing of such brief or motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Esq.
Appellate Advocates
2 Rector Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006
and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged; assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1, et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the file has been sealed, it is hereby unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing assigned counsel or his or her representative access to the record for the purpose of preparing the appeal; such access shall include permission to copy the papers insofar as they pertain to the appellant; and it is further,
ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the Clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk
Appellant's Address:
03 A 4495
Sing Sing Corr. Fac.
354 Hunter Street
Ossining, New York 10562