Court of Appeals Decision List
Decided November 24, 2003
Cases
Domen Holding Co., &c., Appellant, v. Irene S. Aranovich, Respondent, Jorge Aranovich, et al., Defendants.	Order, insofar as appealed from, modified, without costs, by denying defendant's cross motion for summary judgment and, as so modified, affirmed. Opinion by Judge Ciparick. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.
The People &c., Respondent, v. Jian Jing Huang, Appellant.	Order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, with directions to dismiss the appeal taken to that court, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.
Todd B. Marsh, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. Prudential Securities Incorporated, Respondent.	Following certification of a question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and acceptance of the question by this Court pursuant to section 500.17 of the Rules of Practice of the New York State Court of Appeals, and after hearing argument by counsel for the parties and consideration of the briefs and the record submitted, certified question answered in the affirmative. Opinion by Judge Graffeo. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt and Read concur.
The People &c., Respondent, v. Bruce McDonald, Appellant.	Order affirmed. Opinion by Judge Ciparick. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.
County of Nassau, Appellant, v. Michaele K. Canavan, Respondent.	Order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Chief Judge Kaye. Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.
In the Matter of Edward A. Zelinsky et al., Appellants, v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New York et al., Respondents.	Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Chief Judge Kaye. Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.
Motions
Alexander Avenue Kosher Restaurant Corp., Appellant, v. Ronald Dragoon, Respondent; et al., Defendant; 933 Atlantic Avenue Kosher Restaurant Corp., et al., Counterclaim Plaintiffs- Respondents.	Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
In the Matter of Donald Mack Bennett, Appellant, v. New Rochelle Police Department, Respondent.	On the Court's own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. Judge Read took no part.
In the Matter of James Edwards, Appellant, v. James Edward Pelzer, &c., Respondent.	Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Jennifer Guss, Appellant, v. Oheka Management, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And a third-party action.)	Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
In the Matter of Sinclair Haberman, Appellant, v. City of Long Beach, et al., Respondents.	Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with four hundred dollars costs and one hundred dollars costs of motion, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
Gabriel F. Haughton, Appellant, v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, et al., Respondents, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York et al., Defendants.	Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied.
Gail Lowe Haymes, Appellant, v. Stephen Denis Haymes, Respondent.	Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied.
Ronald Jackson, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.	Motion for reconsideration of this Court's September 18, 2003 dismissal order denied.
In the Matter of Juron & Minzner, P.C. Edward S. Minzner, Respondent; Albert A. Juron, &c., Appellant.	Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied.
Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp., et al., Appellants, v. MG Refining and Marketing, Inc., Defendant, MG Holdings North America, Inc., &c., Respondent.	Motion for leave to appeal granted.
In the Matter of Bruce F. Murry, Appellant. --------------------------------- Onondaga County District Attorney, Respondent.	Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
The State of New York, et al., Respondents, v. Philip Morris Incorporated, et al., Respondents, Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., et al., Intervenors-Respondents, Jack S. Hoffinger, Esq., et al., Non-Party-Appellants.	Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
Walter Olsen, &c., et al., Appellants, v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation et al., Respondents.	Motion for leave to appeal denied.
Charleen Palumbo, Respondent, v. Robert Palumbo, Appellant.	Motion for reargument &c. denied.
In the Matter of Donald G. Pedro, Respondent, v. Village of Endicott et al., Appellants. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.	Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
In the Matter of Garret Robertson, Appellant, v. Bernard Kerik, &c., Respondent.	Motion for leave to appeal denied.
Agueda Santana, &c., et al., Appellants, v. Seagrave Fire Apparatus Corp., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1). --------------------------------- Agueda Santana, &c., et al., Appellants, v. Campbell Supply Co., Inc., Respondent. (Action No. 2).	Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
Raphael A. Solomon, Respondent, v. Myrah A. Solomon, Appellant.	Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Malcolm C. Souness, Appellant, v. Rita Randall, Respondent.	Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Marie Washington, &c., Appellant, v. Stephen G. Gorray, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.	Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.