|
| |
| In the
Matter of Classic Realty LLC, &c., Appellant, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent. |
Order reversed, with costs, and
matter remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, with directions to remand to the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion herein. Opinion by Judge Ciparick. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and Smith concur. |
| The People &c., Respondent, v. Dexter Hemmings, Appellant. |
Order affirmed. Opinion by Judge Graffeo. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Read and Smith concur. |
| In the Matter of
Hertz Corporation, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent. |
Order reversed, with costs, and
matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Third Department, with directions to remand to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Read and Smith concur. Judge Graffeo took no part. |
| New York State Association
of Nurse Anesthetists, Respondent, v. Antonia C. Novello, as Commissioner of Health, et al., Appellants. |
Order reversed, with costs, and
complaint dismissed. Opinion by Chief Judge Kaye. Judges George Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur. Judge Robert Smith dissents in an opinion. |
| New York Telephone
Company, Appellant, v. Nassau County, et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1) --------------------------------- In the Matter of New York Water Service Corporation, Appellant, v. Nassau County, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1) --------------------------------- In the Matter of Long Island Water Corporation, Appellant, v. Nassau County, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2) |
Order, insofar as appealed from,
reversed, with costs, and cases remitted to Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion herein. Opinion by Judge George Smith. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and Robert Smith concur. |
The People &c., Appellant, v. Dana W. Tyler, Respondent. |
Order affirmed. Opinion by Judge Read. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Smith concur. |
| Andrew Greenberg, Inc., Appellant, v. Sir-Tech Software, Inc. et al., Defendants, Sir-Tech Canada, Ltd. et al., Respondents. |
Motion for leave to appeal granted. |
| In the Matter of Ashley
B., et al. --------------------------------- Oneida County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Laney K. et al., Appellants. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Edward Bradshaw, Appellant, v. National Structures, Inc., Respondent. --------------------------------- (And Two Third-Party Actions). |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Michael Brady, Appellant, v. Benenson Capital Co., et al., Respondents. (And A Third-Party Action) |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| Kenneth Browne et al., Respondents, v. Prime Contracting Design Corp., Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| In the Matter of John
P. Callanan, Respondent, v. Police Commission for Town of Clarkstown, Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Isabel Canela, &c., Respondent, v. Audubon Gardens Realty Corp., Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. |
| The People &c., Respondent, v. John C. Delmarle, Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Dime Savings Bank of New
York, Respondent, v. Anne M. Glavey, Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Dorothy Fitch, &c., et
al., Plaintiffs, v. Turner Construction Company, et al., Defendants. --------------------------------- (And Other Actions) --------------------------------- Turner Construction Company, et al., Third Third-Party Respondents, v. Owen Steel Company, Inc., et al., Third Third-Party Respondents, American Steel Erectors, Inc., Third Third-Party Appellant, Reliance National, Third Third-Party Defendant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| In the Matter of Irene
Fleischer, Respondent, v. McKenica Corporation et al., Appellants. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| In the Matter of Jason G. et
al., Children Under the Age of 18 Years Alleged to be Neglected. Pamela G., Appellant, Commissioner of the Administra- tion for Children's Services, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. |
| The People &c. ex rel.
Terrice Harvey, Appellant, v. Michael Parrott, &c., Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. |
| Industron Associates,
Inc., Respondent, v. United Innovations, Inc., Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| Joan Hansen & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corp., Respondent, Everlast Worldwide Inc., &c., et al., Defendants. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| In the Matter of Elvin
Lebron, Appellant, v. Hon. Barbara Kapnick, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. |
| In the Matter of John
Lodge et al., Appellants, v. Louis S. D'Aliso, &c. et al., Respondents. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| In the Matter of Teresa E.
Myers, Appellant, v. H. Carl McCall, &c., Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| New York Telephone
Company, Appellant, v. Nassau County, et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1) --------------------------------- In the Matter of New York Water Service Corporation, Appellant, v. Nassau County, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1) --------------------------------- In the Matter of Long Island Water Corporation, Appellant, v. Nassau County, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2) |
Motion to strike portions of
respondents' brief denied. |
| In the Matter of Edward
A. O'Brien, III, Appellant, v. Teresa Readling O'Brien, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Primagency, Inc., Respondent, v. V-Formation, Inc., Appellant. |
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court's denial of the motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. |
| Meghan Robertson, &c., et
al., Respondents, v. Stuart Greenstein, M.D., et al., Appellants. |
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. |
| Rondout Electric, Inc., Appellant, v. Monroe-Woodbury Central School District, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. |
| In the Matter of
Antoinette Savidis, Appellant, v. Board of Education Retirement System for City of New York et al., Respondents. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Marietta Small, &c., Appellant, v. Joseph Gutleber, Jr., et al., Respondents. (And A Third-Party Action) |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| Paula S. Sparaco, Respondent, v. John R. Sparaco, Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| In the Matter of Steuben
County Support Collection Unit, &c., Respondent, v. Robin G. Bartholomew, Appellant. --------------------------------- In the Matter of Robin G. Bartholomew, Appellant, v. Steuben County Support Collection Unit, &c., Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| In the Matter of Martin
H. Tankleff, Appellant, v. Daniel A. Senkowski, &c., Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. |
| In the Matter of Gary
Thompson, Appellant, v. Saucke Brothers Construction Company, Inc., Respondent. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| United Water New Rochelle,
Inc., Respondent, v. Planning Board of Town of Eastchester, et al., Appellants. (Matter No. 1) --------------------------------- In the Matter of United Water New Rochelle, Inc., Respondent, v. Planning Board of Town of Eastchester, et al., Appellants. (Matter No. 2) |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
In the Matter of Lashawn Winthrop, Appellant, v. Glenn S. Goord, &c., Respondent. |
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying summary relief, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance, dismissed as untimely (see, CPLR 5513[b]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. |