| In the Matter of Hamilcar Barca, Appellant, v. Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. |
| The People &c., Respondent, v. Frank Baylor, Jr., Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Pamela M. Bickford, &c., Appellant, v. St. Francis Hospital, et al., Respondents. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. |
| In the Matter of Alan J. Brisson, Respondent, v. County of Onondaga, Appellant, et al., Respondent. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. |
Motion to strike exhibits denied. Cross motion denied as unnecessary. |
| Broadway Associates, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Ernesto Carballo, Plaintiff, v. 444 East 87th Street Owners Corp. et al., Appellants, Big Z Builders, Inc., &c., et al., Respondents. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| Xiao Yang Chen, Appellant, v. Ian Ira Fischer, Respondent. |
Motion to strike part of the reply brief denied. |
| The People &c., Respondent, v. Dwayne Douglas, Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| The People &c. ex rel. Ellis Eiland, Appellant, Thomas Poole, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility, Respondent. |
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. |
| The People &c., Respondent, v. Ellis Eiland, Appellant. |
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie (see, NY Const, art VI, § 3[b]; CPLR 5601; CPL 450.90). |
| Selma Farrago, et al., Appellants, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. et al., Defendants, Village of Bronxville, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| Raul Garcia et al., Appellants, v. Peter Pepe, Jr., et al., Defendants, JWS Technologies, Respondent. |
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellants' motion for renewal, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. |
| Albert Goetz-Haddad, Appellant, v. Pathmark Supermarkets, et al., Respondents. |
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601). |
| Debra Guzov, &c., Appellant, v. Manor Lodge Holding Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants. |
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing the complaint against Manor Lodge Holding Corp., dismissed as untimely (see, CPLR 5513[b]; Eaton v State of New York, 76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument and renewal, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. |
| Hanover Square Antiques, Ltd., &c., Appellant, v. Dennis R. Insalaco et al., Respondents. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| In the Matter of Jose Howithi, Appellant, v. Brion D. Travis, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the issues presented have become moot. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. |
| In the Matter of John A., Appellant, v. Bridget M., Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| In the Matter of Richard E. Kaplan, Appellant, v. Timothy Julian, as Mayor of the City of Utica, &c., et al., Respondents. |
Appeal transferred without costs, by the Court sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitu- tional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3[b][2], 5[b]; CPLR 5601[b][2]). |
| In the Matter of Madison Square Garden, L.P., Appellant, v. New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- In the Matter of Walter Mankoff, et al., Appellants, Assemblyman Richard N. Gottfried, &c., et al., Petitioners, v. New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal granted. Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Read took no part. |
| In the Matter of Clarence McGann, Appellant, v. Howard Holanchock, &c., Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Candy Medina, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| Michael Melnitzky, Appellant, v. Ronald Hollander, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Richard Miller, Respondent, v. Weyerhaeuser Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. |
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right, pursuant to CPLR 5601(d), from the final judgment of Supreme Court to bring up for review the prior nonfinal order of the Appellate Division, where the Appellate Division order was unanimous and did not directly involve a substantial constitutional question. Judge Read took no part. |
| In the Matter of Monroe County Support Collection Unit, on behalf of Patricia Wills, Respondent, v. David Wills, Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| In the Matter of Jennifer Novara, on Behalf of Victoria Jones, an Infant, Appellant, v. Cantor Fitzgerald, LP et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. (And Another Related Claim.) |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Judge R.S. Smith took no part. |
| NYCTL 1997-1 Trust &c., Respondent, v. Gerard T. Goonan, Appellant, et al., Defendants. |
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. |
| In the Matter of Town of Orangetown, et al., Respondents, v. Orangetown Policemen's Benevolent Association, et al., Appellants. |
Motion for leave to appeal granted. |
| In the Matter of William Pabon, Appellant, v. William E. Phillips, &c. Respondent. |
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. |
| Raymond Corporation et al., Respondents, v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Appellant. |
Motion for reargument denied. |
| The People &c., ex rel. Willis Redd, Appellant, v. Larry Davis, &c., Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. |
| In the Matter of Thomas J. Regan, Appellant, v. New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System et al., Respondents. |
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. |
| Michael J. Ruffino, Appellant, v. Joseph B. Neiman, M.D. and Joseph B. Neiman, M.D., P.C., Respondents. |
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. |
| In the Matter of Katarzyna Sacharczuk, Respondent, v. Brendon Holder, Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Jose Santiago, Appellant, v. City of Rochester, et al., Respondents. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| Michael Sawczyn et al., Appellants, v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| In the Matter of Daggana Sillah, et al., Respondents, v. Shahid Tanvir, Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| In the Matter of Patrick M. Snyder, Appellant, v. Third Department Judicial Screening Committee, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| St. Charles Hospital and Rehabilitation Center, Appellant, v. Royal Globe Insurance Company, et al., Respondents, Joseph Mulholland, &c., et al., Defendants. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. |
| State of New York, Respondent, v. Margaret E. Dennin et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. |
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. |
| State of New York, Respondent, v. Roger W. Neill, Appellant. |
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. |
| In the Matter of John A. Tartaglia, &c., a suspended attorney. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Respondent; John A. Tartaglia, Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| In the Matter of the Claim of Sarah Taylor, on Behalf of Donnie Taylor Jr. et al., Infants, Appellant, v. Aon Corporation, et al., Respondents. Workers Compensation Board, Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Judge R.S. Smith took no part. |
| In the Matter of Aaron Tyk, Appellant, v. New York State Education Department, Respondent. |
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. |
| In the Matter of United Water New Rochelle, Inc., Respondent, v. James R. King, &c., Appellant. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
| In the Matter of Dean Wright, Appellant, v. Glenn Goord, &c., Respondent. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. |
In the Matter of Martin Wynyard, et al., &c., Appellants, v. Rotraut L.U. Beiny, et al., Respondents, The Antique Company of New York, Inc., Intervening Petitioner. |
Motion for leave to appeal denied. In the Matter of Martin Wynyard, et al., &c., Appellants, v. Rotraut L.U. Beiny, et al., Respondents, The Antique Company of New York, Inc., Intervening Petitioner. |