| Goldman v Rose Castle Redevelopment II, LLC |
| Motion No: 2021-07924 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2022 NY Slip Op 62559(U) |
| Decided on March 4, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M281729
E/sl
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
LARA J. GENOVESI
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
|
2021-07924 Yoel Goldman, appellant-respondent, v Rose Castle Redevelopment II, LLC, et al., respondents-appellants, Fedor Itskovitch, et al., respondents. (Index No. 510224/2021)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 30, 2021. Motion by the respondent-appellant Rose Castle Redevelopment II, LLC and the respondents Lotus Residences LLC, Franklin Realty Owners LLC, Flushing & Little Nassau LLC, and Wythe Berry LLC, inter alia, to vacate a stay which was granted by a decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 17, 2021, and, in effect, to correct the record.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is, in effect, to correct the record is granted to the extent that on or before April 4, 2022, the appellant-respondent shall serve and file, via NYSCEF, a digital replacement joint record with a cover containing an appearance for Jerome Goldman, counsel for the respondent Fedor Itskovitch, in addition to the other appearances; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
IANNACCI, J.P., ROMAN, GENOVESI and FORD, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court