Matter of Applications for Extensions of Time
Motion No:
Slip Opinion No: 2022 NY Slip Op 66282(U)
Decided on May 23, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M283166

E/

In the Matter of Applications for Extensions

of Time

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.9(b),(g)(1) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it is

ORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:

Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended Deadline
1934 Bedford, LLC v Gutman Weiss, P.C. 2022-02580 Gutman Weiss, P.C.
Arthur Gutman
July 13, 2022
4 Colonial Drive, LLC v Suburban Consultants, Ltd. 2021-06306 Suburban Consultants, Ltd.
Steven Mazziotti
Susan Laviano
Thomas Laviano
July 8, 2022
Babakhanov v Diaz Austin Assoc., L.P. 2021-08886 VYG Group 1, Inc.
Yakov Vaynshteyn
August 1, 2022
Bank of New York Mellon v Waheed 2021-06987 Bank of New York Mellon June 22, 2022
Cabibbo v Sergio General Contracting Corp. 2021-08360 Elvira Cabibbo
Giuseppe Cabibbo
June 24, 2022
Ditech Financial, LLC v Roldan 2021-08672 Ditech Financial, LLC July 25, 2022
Domanski v Sun Moon NY, LLC 2021-02064 Sun Moon NY, LLC
Cava Construction & Development, Inc.
June 21, 2022
Fasciano v Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 2021-07307 William Specialty Services, LLC June 6, 2022
Gunnells v Town of Brookhaven 2021-07205 Town of Brookhaven June 2, 2022
IPA Asset Management, LLC v HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 2021-08668 IPA Asset Management, LLC July 22, 2022
J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. v Tamaklo 2021-06966 J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. June 23, 2022
JL White Management, Inc. v Hillcrest Point Apartment Owners Corp. 2021-07697 Sasha Brewer-Mews June 22, 2022
Lluilema v Site 6, DSA Owner, LLC 2021-00803 +1 Site 6, DSA Owner, LLC
Delancey Builders, LLC
May 31, 2022
Matter of Gur-Arie v Zucker 2022-01137 David Gur-Arie June 30, 2022
Matter of Hilco Brands, LLC v Kirschenbaum 2021-05410 Hilco Brands, LLC June 24, 2022
Matter of In Rem Tax Foreclosure Action No. 53 2021-03481 City of New York June 10, 2022
Matter of State of New York v R. (Anonymous) 2021-07335 State of New York June 30, 2022
McPhoy v New York City Transit Authority 2021-08802 New York City Transit Authority
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
MV Transportation, Inc.
John R. Ostrowski
July 25, 2022
Min Zhang v Park Avenue & 35th Street Corp. 2021-08621 Seven Park Avenue Corporation
Lovett Company
July 25, 2022
People v Casiano, Anthony 2020-08193 People of State of New York June 30, 2022
People v Weng, Yayun 2017-01857 People of State of New York June 28, 2022
People v Zephir, Patrick 2019-02527 People of State of New York June 27, 2022
Santander Bank, N.A. v Frankel 2021-09045 Santander Bank, N.A. August 1, 2022
Skeldon v Faessler 2021-06508 Ronald F. Faessler July 8, 2022
Stout v Consolidated Edison Company of New York 2021-07231 William Specialty Services, LLC June 6, 2022
Suburban Restoration Co., Inc. v State of New York Department of Labor 2021-04462 State of New York Department of Labor July 20, 2022
Vazquez v J. Mullen & Sons, Inc. 2021-07951 Raymond Vazquez June 30, 2022
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v Tobing 2021-08554 Wells Fargo Bank, NA July 22, 2022

For causes in which efiling is not mandatory, all briefs shall be served in accordance with section 1250.1(c) of the Rules of Practice of the Appellate Division (22 NYCRR §1250.1[c]) and via e-mail, and a digital copy with proof of service shall be deemed filed by being uploaded through the digital portal on this Court's website https://www.nycourts.gov/courts/AD2/Digital_Submission.shtml, on or before those deadlines.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court

1. Extension granted only to the extent indicated.

2. Opposition to this application was received.