| IN THE MATTER OF TOURE HENDERSON JOHNSON V FLOR FORTY, (ALSO KNOWN AS FLOR FORTY CRUZ AND FLOR EASTON), AND GLORIA D. |
| Motion No: CAF 21-01326 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2022 NY Slip Op 71738(U) |
| Decided on September 9, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ.
CAF 21-01326
Docket No. V-625-20/21C
Docket No. V-625-20/20B
Docket No. V-3096-14/21C
Docket No: V-3096-14/21B
| IN THE MATTER OF TOURE HENDERSON JOHNSON,
PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V FLOR FORTY, (ALSO KNOWN AS FLOR FORTY CRUZ AND FLOR EASTON), AND GLORIA D.
HENDERSON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. IN THE MATTER OF FLOR FORTY, (ALSO KNOWN AS FLOR FORTY CRUZ AND
FLOR EASTON), PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V TOURE HENDERSON JOHNSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND GLORIA D. HENDERSON,
RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. ———————————————&mda
sh;——————- IN THE MATTER OF FLOR FORTY (ALSO KNOWN AS FLOR FORTY CRUZ AND FLOR EASTON,
PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V TOURE HENDERSON JOHNSON,
RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ———————————————&mdash
;——————— IN THE MATTER OF TOURE HENDERSON JOHNSON,
PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V FLOR FORTY (ALSO KNOWN AS FLOR FORTY CRUZ AND FLOR EASTON),
RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. |
Counsel for appellant having moved to be relieved of assignment on the appeal taken herein from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County, entered August 27, 2021, and for other relief,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied (see Matter of Fowler v Rothman, 198 AD3d 1374, 1374 [4th Dept 2021], lv dismissed 38 NY3d 995 [2022]; Matter of Blagg v Downey, 132 AD3d 1078, 1079 [3d Dept 2015]).
Entered: September 9, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court