| Faye T. Madigan, etc. v Berkeley Capital LLC |
| Motion No: |
| Slip Opinion No: 2022 NY Slip Op 73230 |
| Decided on October 20, 2022 |
| Court of Appeals Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Faye T. Madigan, etc.,
Appellant,
v
Berkeley Capital LLC, et al.,
Defendants,
Rosa Bronstein, et al.,
Respondents,
Oceana Holding Corp.,
Respondent.
Appeal, insofar as taken by Faye T. Madigan from so much of the Appellate Division order as granted that branch of the motion to hold plaintiff's counsel in criminal contempt, dismissed without costs, by the Courtsua sponte, upon the ground that she is not a party aggrieved (see CPLR 5511); appeal otherwise dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that the remaining portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.